The original problem was of not moderating the site adequately enough and fear of lawsuits and criminal charges. I guess they got that taken care of.
But I still think they never intended to shut down. The free publicity was their goal
^ OnlyFans holds no appeal for me, but if the payment processors can strongarm PornHub, they can certainly strongarm OnlyFans. Like someone on the thread said, they're "suspending" the change, not "canceling" it.
Yep, 2ICEE, The article I read it seemed like moderation was a problem. They need to do a better job of CYA if that was true.
For me I have not made the jump past making an account. So far the $20.00 a month then plus whatever to subscribe to the content creator. Isn't worth it to me, also knowing OF gets a cut of that also. I could waste money on udemy or a book club for that price.
===> "wish they would shut it down to porn. This way dancers would have to come back to work and get on their knees"
I'm not convinced that OF is bleeding clubs of dancers. From all reports only a tiny % of girls who go on that thing earn any real money. I know a few girls who tried it when the clubs were closed and it never did much for them. I recently read somewhere that a tiny fraction of all the girls on OF are responsible for the bulk of OF's revenues.
^ It’s the same with any of these get rich quick schemes, the first few do well or get promoted by the scheme, but the rest get the crumbs.
My philosophy about business is once everyone is trying to get in, that’s my cue to take profits and get out leaving the herd to fight for whatever remains are left behind
On the sugaring forum this was discussed the other day and the consensus was it is just a click bait headline and that only fans is ONLY banning some extreme forms of porn like beastiality and incest for example.
8 comments