Why do some clubs tolerate extras, while other clubs discourage/prohibit extras?
Electronman
Too much of a good thing is never enough
Sunday, July 26, 2020 1:17 AM
Why do some clubs tolerate extras, while other clubs discourage/prohibit extras?
I suspect that the answer is more complex than "it depends on enforcement practices of local LEO." While that might be correct, that answer then leads to the follow up question-- why do some cities/municipalities tolerate strip club extras while other cities devote extensive resources to regulate/suppress extras?
Do "extras tolerant" clubs attract more customers and generate higher profits for the owners and more tax revenue for the local municipality? Thus, there might be some balancing between risk and benefits by the owners and by the municipality.
Why do some municipalities tolerate extras clubs (they generate tax revenue?) while others do their best to regulate or close down strip clubs? Does it depend on active citizens groups (concerned about property values, religious ideals) who pressure local politicians?
What are the key factors that influence your local clubs to tolerate or suppress ITC extras?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
29 comments