Articles can be published again

Thank you, dearest Founder.

VIP members can vote on unpublished articles here

tuscl.net

Thanks

Hmm, link didn't work for me. (Android phone)

Sorry, link should work now

And it does.

Sorry guys, there was a bug that reset all the votes. Please continue to vote again on article publishing.

Thanks!

Wow this is interesting. I hope people don't get too stringent like with reviews, articles should be more wide open. I definitely lost a couple articles in there that I put a lot of creative energy into but it what it is, it can be seen as trolling I guess so I understand.

And did y'all see some of the crap that people submit, like a two sentence question submitted as an article? lol they just must be confused or something but I rejected that stuff in a nanosecond.

Thanks muddy

You have a few articles in the queue, you just don't see them.

" The Process; A System for the next decade " . Do you really think this process won't change for 10 years ?

Let's see if these vote stick. Comment from one of the votes I just put in there:

"I'm generally with recap stories are for the boards and articles are for helpful sharing with the community. This is a close one."

Yeah. I put actual comments no matter which way I vote.

And whoever ripped off the BBC article at bbc.com. Not cool.

There are two that are plagarism. The BBC article wallanon just mentioned and the one with the five tips for strip clubs.

I almost approved something even though it got a little weird halfway through, then I saw those three letters at the bottom...

sinclair called it on the five tips for strips. rumorscabaret.net. And of course it's attached to a strip club, because this is shillery at its most blatant and spectacular.

That's a good candidate for certain rager's trademarked anti-shill greeting.

Wow. I thought you threw my submission away a long time ago. First to be approved. I'm so honored. Thanks to all the judges and of course the little people who made this all possible. Of course there is now the follow on with the "rest of the story" since the original submission date. lol

Oh yeah right that makes sense just like reviews can’t view/vote your own stuff. I think it’s a cool improvement, just another way for users to be more interactive with the site.

@warrior lol I’ll it’s hard to even remember. I wrote that last year sometime.

Finally an upside to the CoronaVirus as it has given our beloved founder the free time to reintroduce this feature.

Thanks, founder. I've noticed a few strange nuances. The article that got published today didn't have a list of publishers, or how they voted. Do articles still need 7 looks with 4 up votes to be published.

Also , coming back to list, still see unpublished articles that I already voted on. When I click to vote (thinking it might have been duplicate submission, I get a pop up "article no longer unpublished". (Didn't see it in articles, unless it's someone I have on ignore.

Articles need 5 looks with 3 upvotes

You may see articles again because I had a bug earlier that wiped out all the votes, or you may need to refresh the page.

Submitted article "30 quotes for investment i found on the net...... good luck to all.........happy memorial day 2020.... may we make money in 2020 for our hobby"

One throwaway line doesn't make a list of money investing quotes relevant to strip clubs. Plus this is copied from multiple websites. One of them is ruleoneinvesting.com

^ yeah - IDK why that article was published - it's a strip-club website not an investing website -at most it should have been a discussion-board thread - probably a cheap attempt at getting VIP

It took a few seconds to look it up. When I rejected it I flagged it as not original. Idea...