Barrage of poor reviews

Agree @Papi, been quite a few, lately, and the weird thing about the poorly written reviews that I often notice, is that several usually appear at the same time.

Papi, I agree. They're so short and don't give you a good feel for what the place is like. Reviewers put in the bare minimum to get approved - cover fee, drink prices, dance prices, and then maybe a blurb about what they did with a girl without much details. Many of them don't even do that. Maybe Founder needs to put in like a minimum character length for reviews to be able to submit. But sometimes a short review has good info, like if the place closed, so a minimum length would keep that sort of info from being posted since there's not much to say other than...this place is closed.

Agree. Many of them are leaving our restroom intel. As I learned at Chicas Locas Dallas, this is critical info.

I've seen them, too, and been rejecting them for too few details. There have also been a lot of reviews for trips that were supposedly weeks or months ago, and those get rejected as well.

@jacej

There is a character minimum and it gets auto-rejected by the TUSCL SW and doesn't make it to the Unpublished list - IDK what the character min is but it's not too big a # apparently (I guess mainly to avoid reviews with just 2 or 3 sentences)

Ahh...good to know, Papi. Wasn't aware of that as I tend to be verbose.

Agreed. Been hitting the big red button more often.

Agree. I have rejected a lot more lately.

I hereby propose appointing Papi as master grader. His assignment is to grade all published reviews on F through A scale. By each members profile would be the "Papi Grade" average for their submitted reviews. How about that, Papi ?

I've noticed them but from what I've seen they haven't been really getting through.