United States Supreme Court acknowledges prophet Muhammad as one of the greatest

Retired Queen Troll of TUSCL...who will succeed my reign?

6/21/2019 5:28:35 AM

https://stepfeed.com/the-us-supreme-cour…

Why is this relevant ? 2 reasons I guess.

- I have seen a lot of islamophobic rhetoric on here. Disregard for "islamophobia" as a legitimate term is proof in itself of some of your islamophobic beliefs.

- I have also seen content on here regarding judicial statements and decisions.

41 comments

Jump to latest

skibum609

•

6 years ago

Islamaphobia is a fake, hate speech phrase used as a weapon by bigots. Hating islam means you hate it, not that you are afraid of it. Mohammed had a nine year old wife. The Supreme Court also said at one time that slavery was a -o.k.. Just another fuck up.

future POTUS and Senator in training

•

6 years ago

Hating islam means you hate it, not that you are afraid of it.

Hatinf and fearing do not have to be mutually exclusive .they can be mutually inclusive properties.

Islamophobia is a term that pertains to those who fear Islam, because there are people who fear it

The Supreme Court also said at one time that slavery was a -o.k.

Yeah but that same court also struck down segregation..so a prevuous fuck up does not automatically imply that every subsequent judicial decision thereafter will be a fuck up.after all, it's nice to gain recognition .

prevert

•

6 years ago

What a load of bullshit. The SC didn’t make any ruling to that effect, they just acknowledged that the specific piece of art in question doesn’t violate any of the First Amendment provisions.

That’s not an endorsement by any means.

future POTUS and Senator in training

•

6 years ago

piece of art in question doesn’t violate any of the First Amendment provisions.

No, they acknowledged more than that.

future POTUS and Senator in training

•

6 years ago

Placement of secular figures such as Caesar Augustus, William Blackstone, Napoleon Bonaparte and John Mar-hall alongside these three religious leaders, however, signals respect not for great proselytizers but for great lawgivers," he wrote.

They did not state that the placement of the political figures in particular signals respect for great lawgivers, but rather that the placement of the political figures alongside the religious figures (I.g a combination of people like Caesar being placed next to ppl like Muhammad) is what signals respect for great law givers..

Mate27

•

6 years ago

Islamic/Muslims are the only group of people that are openly hateful towards gay people, oppressive to women, and chant death to Christians yet we still find so called liberals tolerant of their Islamic views. What gives??!!

The liberals are the most tolerant of these types of intolerants. Completely wrong, and one of many reasons why you should not defend the Islamic faith as you claim.

skibum609

•

6 years ago

Liberals aren't tolerant at all. Find me a video of some right wing "legitimate" group shouting down speakers. The assholes on the left cannot even hear a diffwering opinion without shouting it down or seeking counselling because in their stupidity and mental illness they don't feel "safe" if they have to hear anything their pea brains cannot agree with. The only reason the Court included a guy who married a nine year old girl was to show that the inclusion of nothings means it was not a Govbernment endorsement of a particular religion. Napoleon Bonaparte was a mass murderer.

Mate27

•

6 years ago

^ Skibum, the liberals are tolerant of the intolerant Islamic.

twentyfive

•

6 years ago

Debating a child about intolerance isn’t a great look

skibum609

•

6 years ago

How I "look" is irrelevant' and since the intent of the post was to cause animus, I felt obligated to provide same. Have a great weekend to one and all.