Going Metric

avatar for reverendhornibastard
reverendhornibastard
Depraved Deacon of Degeneracy
I’ve always regarded rating women on a scale of one to ten to be a pathetic and sophomoric practice. It is both demeaning to women and appallingly imprecise.

I prefer the Helen of Troy beauty scale. Using the vastly more precise Helen of Troy beauty scale allows a woman’s beauty to be rated on a scale between 1 and 1,000.

It works like this:

If one Helen is the amount of beauty it takes to launch 1,000 ships, then one millihelen (abbreviated as “mh”) is the amount of beauty it takes to launch one ship. This system affords greater precision in rating women in millihelens, anywhere between 1 mh to 1,000 mh (1,000 mh being the equivalent of 1 Helen.)

Most of Europe uses the more precise Helen of Troy beauty scale.

23 comments

Jump to latest
avatar for reverendhornibastard
reverendhornibastard
6 years ago
I forgot to mention, going metric in measuring the size of your pecker also yields considerable benefits because it puts most of us easily into double digits.
avatar for Warrior15
Warrior15
6 years ago
OK. Then based on the Helen of Troy scale, what would you rate this one :

https://www.pornhub.com/pornstar/lana-rh…
avatar for flagooner
flagooner
6 years ago
Yes, much less pathetic and sophomoric. And not at all demeaning to women.
avatar for pistola
pistola
6 years ago
@Warrior that’s a hottie. Good taste. I give her a 812.3782
avatar for Uprightcitizen
Uprightcitizen
6 years ago
What is your baseline for ship tonnage? Technically 1 large aircraft carrier could count as multiple baseline "ships".
avatar for 4got2wipe
4got2wipe
6 years ago
Brilliant fact for flagooner:

Anything can be made to sound less sophomoric by embracing precision. pistola would have been a moron if he rated the porn girl an 8. But 812.3782? That some aces girl rating! ;)
avatar for flagooner
flagooner
6 years ago
Brilliant advice for 4got2wipe

Eat shit.

No, really. I know you enjoy that.
avatar for Jascoi
Jascoi
6 years ago
imho she is only a 756.2387459925481.
avatar for Nidan111
Nidan111
6 years ago
I’d dine on her 3.14159265359.
avatar for reverendhornibastard
reverendhornibastard
6 years ago
Nidan, it would certainly be some fabulous eating! You’d NEVER run out of decimals to lick!
avatar for future POTUS and Senator in training
Aww she's pretty
avatar for SirLapdancealot
SirLapdancealot
6 years ago
No rating system of women is complete without irrational numbers.

Just sayin'.
avatar for nicespice
nicespice
6 years ago
As far as concerns about being demeaning to women(yes I know you were joking), I’d assume a 1-10 scale is less dicey than 1-1000.

For example, instead of two girls hearing they are both a seven and thinking themselves equal, now one is a 730 and the other is a 760. And that’s a bigger deal now.

But the way I see it with numerical ratings in general, is that at the end of the day, it’s too subjective. And getting more precise would make things more fuzzy instead of less.

Unless possibly, it’s just for oneself, and a man has taken the time to set the standards of what aspects weighs in higher and lower for his own scale.

I think most men would rate me a 7 (I’m not too sure) but then there is a small group of men who may rate me 9-10 because my look fits their *specific* preferences.

For TUSCL specifically, since there are a few haters who I’m sure would lower my ratings, my Helen of Troy scale is a 666. xD
avatar for Warrior15
Warrior15
6 years ago
^^ You are a little devil, aren't you ?
avatar for nicespice
nicespice
6 years ago
^^ mwahahaha
avatar for Nidan111
Nidan111
6 years ago
^^^ I would rate you an 8 based on what I have seen. Need to see the motion to go higher. Lol. Some day, hopefully.
avatar for SirLapdancealot
SirLapdancealot
6 years ago
nicespice is a secret succubus
avatar for reverendhornibastard
reverendhornibastard
6 years ago
@Nicespice

“But the way I see it with numerical ratings in general, is that at the end of the day, it’s too subjective.”

That’s what road tests are for!
avatar for flagooner
flagooner
6 years ago
@nice
I'd give you a good 6
avatar for flagooner
flagooner
6 years ago
But I'd rate you higher than that.
avatar for reverendhornibastard
reverendhornibastard
6 years ago
@Flagooner -

Only a 6 for Nicespice? Are you serious? I think you’re being too hard on Nicespice.

I’d give Nicepice 820 mh. I’d love to give her a “hard time.”
avatar for flagooner
flagooner
6 years ago
Saying I would give her a good 6 was optimistic.
avatar for pistola
pistola
6 years ago
Flag meant 2.5 lmao.

As far as this rating system, I like it. If a gals sat score is lower than her hotness rating and hotness rating is above 600, she’s worth a lap dance.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now