Going Metric
reverendhornibastard
Depraved Deacon of Degeneracy
I’ve always regarded rating women on a scale of one to ten to be a pathetic and sophomoric practice. It is both demeaning to women and appallingly imprecise.
I prefer the Helen of Troy beauty scale. Using the vastly more precise Helen of Troy beauty scale allows a woman’s beauty to be rated on a scale between 1 and 1,000.
It works like this:
If one Helen is the amount of beauty it takes to launch 1,000 ships, then one millihelen (abbreviated as “mh”) is the amount of beauty it takes to launch one ship. This system affords greater precision in rating women in millihelens, anywhere between 1 mh to 1,000 mh (1,000 mh being the equivalent of 1 Helen.)
Most of Europe uses the more precise Helen of Troy beauty scale.
I prefer the Helen of Troy beauty scale. Using the vastly more precise Helen of Troy beauty scale allows a woman’s beauty to be rated on a scale between 1 and 1,000.
It works like this:
If one Helen is the amount of beauty it takes to launch 1,000 ships, then one millihelen (abbreviated as “mh”) is the amount of beauty it takes to launch one ship. This system affords greater precision in rating women in millihelens, anywhere between 1 mh to 1,000 mh (1,000 mh being the equivalent of 1 Helen.)
Most of Europe uses the more precise Helen of Troy beauty scale.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
23 comments
https://www.pornhub.com/pornstar/lana-rh…
Anything can be made to sound less sophomoric by embracing precision. pistola would have been a moron if he rated the porn girl an 8. But 812.3782? That some aces girl rating! ;)
Eat shit.
No, really. I know you enjoy that.
Just sayin'.
For example, instead of two girls hearing they are both a seven and thinking themselves equal, now one is a 730 and the other is a 760. And that’s a bigger deal now.
But the way I see it with numerical ratings in general, is that at the end of the day, it’s too subjective. And getting more precise would make things more fuzzy instead of less.
Unless possibly, it’s just for oneself, and a man has taken the time to set the standards of what aspects weighs in higher and lower for his own scale.
I think most men would rate me a 7 (I’m not too sure) but then there is a small group of men who may rate me 9-10 because my look fits their *specific* preferences.
For TUSCL specifically, since there are a few haters who I’m sure would lower my ratings, my Helen of Troy scale is a 666. xD
“But the way I see it with numerical ratings in general, is that at the end of the day, it’s too subjective.”
That’s what road tests are for!
I'd give you a good 6
Only a 6 for Nicespice? Are you serious? I think you’re being too hard on Nicespice.
I’d give Nicepice 820 mh. I’d love to give her a “hard time.”
As far as this rating system, I like it. If a gals sat score is lower than her hotness rating and hotness rating is above 600, she’s worth a lap dance.