Should SCPandit's info be given to the police?
CC99
Say yes to the sex industry!
Sunday, March 17, 2019 3:35 AM
I believe this man is very mentally unstable and I don't know what he is capable of if his persona is in-fact real. He is now posting about having some god given mission to judge "whores" and put them in their place in addition to talking about intentionally infecting strippers with HIV. He even posted a topic once about "shooting up a strip club." I think there are more than enough red flags here to be seriously concerned about what he may be capable of.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
31 comments
the internet writing are thoughts and not necessarily reality.
Either SCPandit is for real, which is a terrifying idea, or he is a troll who has posted 25 fake reviews. Either way, the fact that we will ban harmless prank accounts and not a malicious account which could literally be a danger to public safety is unbelievable.
Even in the DC/Baltimore area it's not realistic to think that LEO will assign any manpower to look for a guy based on strip club forum posts. But, as JimmyMcNulty pointed out, it would give law enforcement an opportunity to pay closer attention to TUSCL. That's not a good idea...
Here's the thing, though. I do believe that there's a possibility that he's actually doing the things he claims and I'd be thrilled if the cops could be pointed in his direction. Because fuck that guy.
But there's nothing here that will give the cops anything worth chasing down. Not in relation to SCPandit.
But I do continue to believe that his profile and all his content should be wiped. And there should be zero tolerance for that type of content here.
But, apparently, I'm in the minority...
Shut the fuck up.... It does not have anything to do with that. DC you were getting into founders pocket and when you mess with someones money then you get slapped. I know you do not understand this because you have been and probably will always live off OPM. You are too fucking stupid to make anything yourself and would rather spend your time destroying what others build, you are the worst of society and should be aborted.
Founder has already said that the review section brings the most web traffic. Needless to say, that's the section that has to be most presentable. So your little stunt wasn't just some 'funny story' to him, as his actions proved.
Nope. But it gives founder one more thing to fix while you're getting your personal chuckles. It goes back to founder mentioning that the forum creates 90% of the headaches and none of the revenue. You became part of that problem, and (appropriately) got wiped as a result.
"Everything's fine and now we all have a funny story to tell."
Really, man... not funny so much as dumb.
"How would a few funny and obviously fake reviews mess with anybody's money?"
If you own your own business, you quickly learn that anything that wastes time impacts revenue negatively. If everyone had your sense of "humor", then this site would become an exhibition of sunk costs.
It wasn't the worst possible thing or the end of the world. But it was sort of a shitty thing to do to someone else's property.
Let's be clear. I absolutely believe that SCPandit's profile and content should be deleted. But I also think it was the appropriate response to your "prank".
Well yes if you play pranks all the time on people it's not that funny anymore. You don't want to get pranked every day. But one every now and then isn't gonna hurt anybody.
Don't be a dick.
Ah hell, even shadowcat got deleted once upon a time. Idk why exactly, but it happened.
And yes, others pass through unscathed. Some reviews aren’t just silly reviews, but merely worthless. So it’s a tough call sometimes to be 100% consistent, especially given how many reviews get passed in a day.
At the end of the day, it’s not a big deal. There is always SJG’s forum to post in if you’re annoyed and would like a break.
SCPandit I have on ignore. In his case, I do believe he is real enough. From what I’ve heard, he may have also been active on an escort site discussion board at some point too.
As far as disclaimers go, they don't really protect anyone. What they do is attempt to lessen the site's liability. Legally, a disclaimer is just a notice. In this case TUSCL is simply not claiming responsibility for "real" reviews. As far as TUSCL knows, everyone's lying, no way to verify what they're saying is true. Does that hold up with the DAs office? Nope...