I believe this man is very mentally unstable and I don't know what he is capable of if his persona is in-fact real. He is now posting about having some god given mission to judge "whores" and put them in their place in addition to talking about intentionally infecting strippers with HIV. He even posted a topic once about "shooting up a strip club." I think there are more than enough red flags here to be seriously concerned about what he may be capable of.
Except that "works of fiction" are actively removed from the site so that's not going to hold up very well.
Either SCPandit is for real, which is a terrifying idea, or he is a troll who has posted 25 fake reviews. Either way, the fact that we will ban harmless prank accounts and not a malicious account which could literally be a danger to public safety is unbelievable.
Jezzaloo DC, you are as lame as fuck your another one of those, what aboutist assholes, shut the fuck up already and go take a girl out, stop acting like such an attention whore
Report what? That there's this anonymous guy on the internet who sounds like a fucked-up vile lunatic? Apparently, it's your first time on the internet, because the when it comes to fucked-up vile lunatics on the internet, there's more out there than grains of sand on the beach.
Even in the DC/Baltimore area it's not realistic to think that LEO will assign any manpower to look for a guy based on strip club forum posts. But, as JimmyMcNulty pointed out, it would give law enforcement an opportunity to pay closer attention to TUSCL. That's not a good idea...
Here's the thing, though. I do believe that there's a possibility that he's actually doing the things he claims and I'd be thrilled if the cops could be pointed in his direction. Because fuck that guy.
But there's nothing here that will give the cops anything worth chasing down. Not in relation to SCPandit.
But I do continue to believe that his profile and all his content should be wiped. And there should be zero tolerance for that type of content here.
"Except that "works of fiction" are actively removed from the site so that's not going to hold up very well."
Shut the fuck up.... It does not have anything to do with that. DC you were getting into founders pocket and when you mess with someones money then you get slapped. I know you do not understand this because you have been and probably will always live off OPM. You are too fucking stupid to make anything yourself and would rather spend your time destroying what others build, you are the worst of society and should be aborted.
To clarify my point about alerting LEO, whether you believe LEO cares at all about the board, that the “works of fiction” defense protects members or that a SWAT team is going to bust in on your next trip to VIP to stop you from LDK, notifying them is stupid. Very little upside if any. If anything at all comes of it, the range of probabilities is almost exclusively bad. No reason to take that risk. Same reason to not mention dancers’ names in connection with extras.
Oh please daddillac. Calm down. So a few fake reviews got published. Was the site shutdown because of it? Was the data scrambled? No. Everything's fine and now we all have a funny story to tell. How would a few funny and obviously fake reviews mess with anybody's money. They weren't even reviews it was a play by play story. Anybody would've just read it and chuckled or gone "WTF is this crap" and moved on.
DC imagine someone new to the site and wanting to see the newest review of Sapphire in Las Vegas and reading that crap. He could have possibly had the reaction you described. OR, he could have looked at that review and took this entire site for a joke and went on to the next Google listing for a strip club review site, losing Founder a customer. Maybe that situation played out more than once.
Founder has already said that the review section brings the most web traffic. Needless to say, that's the section that has to be most presentable. So your little stunt wasn't just some 'funny story' to him, as his actions proved.
CC99 said "Was the site shutdown because of it? Was the data scrambled?"
Nope. But it gives founder one more thing to fix while you're getting your personal chuckles. It goes back to founder mentioning that the forum creates 90% of the headaches and none of the revenue. You became part of that problem, and (appropriately) got wiped as a result.
"Everything's fine and now we all have a funny story to tell."
Really, man... not funny so much as dumb.
"How would a few funny and obviously fake reviews mess with anybody's money?"
If you own your own business, you quickly learn that anything that wastes time impacts revenue negatively. If everyone had your sense of "humor", then this site would become an exhibition of sunk costs.
It wasn't the worst possible thing or the end of the world. But it was sort of a shitty thing to do to someone else's property.
Let's be clear. I absolutely believe that SCPandit's profile and content should be deleted. But I also think it was the appropriate response to your "prank".
I don’t get why you guys keep trying to explain the facts of life to a whiney 12 year old brat, go to your room DC- CC and stay there before you get the whipping you deserve.
You guys are really overestimating the impact that a few silly reviews would have. Every review is of dubious quality. You don't base anything off of one review you check out ten others to see if they say the same thing, thus separating the bullshit from the real.
Well yes if you play pranks all the time on people it's not that funny anymore. You don't want to get pranked every day. But one every now and then isn't gonna hurt anybody.
From what I’ve gathered, nearly every individual who has gotten into having multiple profiles has had at least one deleted at some point. It’s almost like the certificate of being juice crew approved or something. Whether it’s troll accounts making fun of Nina, Trucidos revivals, copy/pastes of juice reviews, club reviews about having a big dick swinging, etc
Ah hell, even shadowcat got deleted once upon a time. Idk why exactly, but it happened.
And yes, others pass through unscathed. Some reviews aren’t just silly reviews, but merely worthless. So it’s a tough call sometimes to be 100% consistent, especially given how many reviews get passed in a day.
At the end of the day, it’s not a big deal. There is always SJG’s forum to post in if you’re annoyed and would like a break.
SCPandit I have on ignore. In his case, I do believe he is real enough. From what I’ve heard, he may have also been active on an escort site discussion board at some point too.
And since I believe he is real, I see no problem with keeping his content around. It’s good intel for dancers to have to remember creeps in fact *do* exist. And that while 99% of customers are not psychopaths, to remember it just takes one to make you an example of the sex worker raped/murdered that people love hearing about.
This site has so much incriminating info on it....
As far as disclaimers go, they don't really protect anyone. What they do is attempt to lessen the site's liability. Legally, a disclaimer is just a notice. In this case TUSCL is simply not claiming responsibility for "real" reviews. As far as TUSCL knows, everyone's lying, no way to verify what they're saying is true. Does that hold up with the DAs office? Nope...
Daddillac leave your gay fantasies for your diary or post them on a fan fiction site. Telling your crush how badly you want to see him pounded though is just poor taste.
Rather than report SCPandit to LE, it's probably more effective that the DMV clubs know about him. I'm sure that those that lurk on this site already do. Kind of like a neighborhood watch/BOLO.
31 comments
Latest
the internet writing are thoughts and not necessarily reality.
Either SCPandit is for real, which is a terrifying idea, or he is a troll who has posted 25 fake reviews. Either way, the fact that we will ban harmless prank accounts and not a malicious account which could literally be a danger to public safety is unbelievable.
Even in the DC/Baltimore area it's not realistic to think that LEO will assign any manpower to look for a guy based on strip club forum posts. But, as JimmyMcNulty pointed out, it would give law enforcement an opportunity to pay closer attention to TUSCL. That's not a good idea...
Here's the thing, though. I do believe that there's a possibility that he's actually doing the things he claims and I'd be thrilled if the cops could be pointed in his direction. Because fuck that guy.
But there's nothing here that will give the cops anything worth chasing down. Not in relation to SCPandit.
But I do continue to believe that his profile and all his content should be wiped. And there should be zero tolerance for that type of content here.
But, apparently, I'm in the minority...
Shut the fuck up.... It does not have anything to do with that. DC you were getting into founders pocket and when you mess with someones money then you get slapped. I know you do not understand this because you have been and probably will always live off OPM. You are too fucking stupid to make anything yourself and would rather spend your time destroying what others build, you are the worst of society and should be aborted.
Founder has already said that the review section brings the most web traffic. Needless to say, that's the section that has to be most presentable. So your little stunt wasn't just some 'funny story' to him, as his actions proved.
Nope. But it gives founder one more thing to fix while you're getting your personal chuckles. It goes back to founder mentioning that the forum creates 90% of the headaches and none of the revenue. You became part of that problem, and (appropriately) got wiped as a result.
"Everything's fine and now we all have a funny story to tell."
Really, man... not funny so much as dumb.
"How would a few funny and obviously fake reviews mess with anybody's money?"
If you own your own business, you quickly learn that anything that wastes time impacts revenue negatively. If everyone had your sense of "humor", then this site would become an exhibition of sunk costs.
It wasn't the worst possible thing or the end of the world. But it was sort of a shitty thing to do to someone else's property.
Let's be clear. I absolutely believe that SCPandit's profile and content should be deleted. But I also think it was the appropriate response to your "prank".
Well yes if you play pranks all the time on people it's not that funny anymore. You don't want to get pranked every day. But one every now and then isn't gonna hurt anybody.
Don't be a dick.
Ah hell, even shadowcat got deleted once upon a time. Idk why exactly, but it happened.
And yes, others pass through unscathed. Some reviews aren’t just silly reviews, but merely worthless. So it’s a tough call sometimes to be 100% consistent, especially given how many reviews get passed in a day.
At the end of the day, it’s not a big deal. There is always SJG’s forum to post in if you’re annoyed and would like a break.
SCPandit I have on ignore. In his case, I do believe he is real enough. From what I’ve heard, he may have also been active on an escort site discussion board at some point too.
As far as disclaimers go, they don't really protect anyone. What they do is attempt to lessen the site's liability. Legally, a disclaimer is just a notice. In this case TUSCL is simply not claiming responsibility for "real" reviews. As far as TUSCL knows, everyone's lying, no way to verify what they're saying is true. Does that hold up with the DAs office? Nope...