Applies to those that TUSCL on their phones.
I find it almost impossible to type on some threads on my ph with the new look where the thread-title is static and statically takes a good portion of the screen - then once the ph keyboard opens up there's barely any room for the textbox to type in - not an issue if not on phone - happens even if the title is not that long.
Poll:
Would you prefer the old look where the title of the thread scrolls out of the way so it's not in the way when typing a post?


Replies (11)Latest
It doesn’t happen on my I phone try logging out and log in again
Just noticed this and yes, would like to see if founder could remove this feature
It's worse with threads with longer titles - I also have my ph display zoomed-in a bit which makes it worse - the issue is the title of the thread now stays static on the screen as you scroll or writing a post and takes up too much of the screen especially with longer thread titles
I like having the thread title static at the top. The better solution (I think) is to limit the length of thread titles.
I don't think limiting legit thread titles is the way to go - user should be allowed to write the thread title that best suits the thread - this is not to say some on here write unnecessarily long thread titles seemingly as troll-behavior
The old way, please. I have the exact same problem as Papi with the new format.
Legit thread titles don't need to be longer than the first three chapters of "War & Peace", in my opinion.
Most forums put a reasonable character limit on topic titles for exactly this reason. I open different topics in different tabs and having a static title is useful and reduces the likelihood that I'll post a comment to the wrong topic.
A useful feature shouldn't be scrapped because a minority of users don't know how to internet, or are intentionally trolling.
It's hard enough to type on a phone - the new format makes it even harder - perhaps those with exrra-large phones/screens are not as adversely affected
I like it like this.
^ would you rate it a 6?
LOL
Join the conversation
Sign in to reply to this discussion.