College Football Playoffs
flagooner
Everything written by this member is a fact.
What I have learned so far from the Cotton Bowl
1. Clemson has a terrible kicking game.
2. Notre Dame's defense is full off pussies.
1. Clemson has a terrible kicking game.
2. Notre Dame's defense is full off pussies.
80 comments
Totally agree.
Having spanked Auburn last year showed the ridiculousness of the whole process. They should go back to having conference tie-ins to Bowl games and have the coaches and AP polls decide it.
At least that way there are more meaningful Bowl games, and the controversy just ensures that the sport gets an extra month of passionate coverage arguing over it.
On second thought, why not just give everyone participation trophies?
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/s…
Bama would still fuck up UCF but it would be fun to get some new blood in there.
One belongs in a bowl
Facts
But if you want to claim that victory as a natty then no bitching about a loss without your injured qb... no fucking crying about that shit.
Football is a game won in the trenches.... UCF is out weighed by 50 pounds per man on both sides of the ball by Vanderbilt. There is no way they could play a legitimate schedule and go undefeated.
They are a great team for what they are, but they are fucking delusional enough that IF they beat LSU they will try to claim a super bowl victory
I agree their schedule is weak. But you can only play who is put in front of you. It's a product of the conferences. Every team only gets a few out of conference games.
There isn't anything to gain for the big boys to risk the loss against a good team from one of the lower conferences. And the schedules are typically built 5-10 years in advance. If the schools in the big conferences didn't pad their non-conference schedule maybe UCF wouldn't be undefeated. We'll never know.
Do I think they're as good as Alabama? I'm not stupid. But they weren't as good as Auburn either. Any given day... It's why they play the games (when they can't run away from them).
The schedules were made 5 years ago.... nobody was afraid of UCF then, they have 4 non conference opponents..... should have been easy to schedule FSU, Florida, Miami, or any of the SEC teams. But they didnt. And you are right you can only play those on your schedule and UCF will not schedule a loss.
I hate awwbern and I'm glad UCF beat them but in reality UCF has won one game in 2 years
That's kinda one of my my points.
And just like Boise State, there is a good likelihood they won't be good 5 years from now. So any team that schedules to play them probably won't get much out of it when they beat a down UCF team. Big Conference teams don't like to schedule the next tier schools because they have no idea what they are bargaining for. They'd rather schedule a sure cupcake or a sure marquee game. It's those 2nd tier conference teams that get lost in the shuffle.
And they do try to get the other state schools to play them, but they don't want to give UCF more recruiting exposure.
As for the Nat. Championship claim...
Yeah, it was facetious, but it did bring attention to the school. And it is funny that SEC fans, and especially Paul Finebaum, get their panties all twisted because of it.
And the claim never would have happened if SEC powerhouse Auburn didn't get stomped by them. That did at least provide a little support to the claim.
I think I'll go out and mow the lawn now. This game will be a snoozer.
SEC = Overrated
I really am going out now. I can't stand to watch a coach cry after his player gets blocked.
Pussies.
Lol, right!
Hell they booed the announcer of the Sugar Bowl last night for nearly ten minutes because he played QB for Penn State and beat them there how many decades ago......
People need to wake up and realize 1) the control the SEC has over the bowl game process and the National Championship 2) that even in secondary ways they will do anything and everything to make sure their teams have every edge possible in any game played and the perception of other good teams around the country.
Lol
Take boxing for instance--it's subjective. There is always going to be some level of disagreement and favoritism but when the level reaches were someone looks at a round/punch and declares " that Bulldog just hit that Longhorn so hard with his "eye" he nearly tore the knuckles out of his left hand you know it's time to give up.
Somewhere on here I had commented once it became apparent OSU was not going to make it to the Championship round that I wanted OSU to play Georgia on a neutral field....5 vs 6--logical sense because I felt pretty damn comfortable it would have been a good match.
I'll end it on this note but I'm pretty sure no one ( including me) expected Texas to grow a defense in the last 30 days when they hadn't shown one in the prior four months.
We are also the youngest team in the SEC so hopefully we will be back
Lol, You can add train tracks to that list.
AS for UCF, didn't they get beat by an SEC school
"Within seconds of losing to Alabama the SEC talking heads were demanding Georgia was a clear choice for the 4th slot in the playoffs.......it was so obvious to them and thus it should be to the world. How could it be an inept offense Flagooner? (with such impartial experts (eyeroll) ) telling us so ?"
Do you remember the 2007 BCS national championship? the one where it was a travesty to not have OSU play Michigan again for the title and the talking heads thought putting Florida in was laughable. How did that turn out for OSU, I think Ginn ran back the kickoff and osu did not see the endzone for a long time after that.
Talking heads are what they are, UGA had no business in the playoff, we lost to LSU and Bama.
As for the Sugar Bowl, we played like shit, we have not played that poorly all year however
- 70 yard difference on that first punt because of a low snap
- fumble on our end of the field
- interception on Texas 10 yard line
- an 11 yard punt
We should have lost by 35 points with all those mistakes but we lost by 7
https://www.instagram.com/marissamowry21…
Good to see Alabama finally get their ass kicked too.
Kind of creepy to me that someone "Old" would comment on a teenager as being "hot".
The fact is that on that one day UCF played their sloppiest game of the year and LSU beat them by 8 pts.
I could point to having the Heisman trophy caliber QB hurt.
I could mention that the back up quarterback played like a back up QB.
I could blame the wide receivers for dropping soooo many passes, two of which were sure TDs that my Mom could have caught.
But I won't do that because it would just be sour grapes.
Clubber, I think she's 19. I'm under 50. Most guys on this site talk about hot strippers her age all the time.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-footba…
That could be because a lot of younger people have forgotten the art of politeness. Still creepy and grude, to me.
Also, your avatar of clubbing a baby seal is creepy as fuck to me. Even if it's a joke, it's not funny. Pretty fucking creepy.
And Flagooner is just as creepy. He posted about getting a boner looking at one of the stripper's pictures on here and she removed her pictures right after that. Nothing like a creepy old man talking about his boner to scare away a young beauty.
Here's the thread where Flagooner talks about getting a boner and the woman gets creeped out and removes her photos right after.
Okay, I'm out of here. Tired of all the arguing on message boards. Waste of time. Enjoy!
As for this being TUSCL, I wouldn't conflate members with the site. There are all type of individuals everywhere! I still find it creepy. Perhaps it might be because I still go with the age of consent being 21.
Avatar a joke? Who told you that. A very normal occupation here.
Take care!