Reviews that are too old

12 comments

• s275ironman

  •

  6 years ago

  IMO, if the visit happened more than a week ago, then a review should not be written.
• doctorevil

  •

  6 years ago

  7 days.
• doctorevil

  •

  6 years ago

  7 days.
• Jascoi

  •

  6 years ago

  if it didn't happen yesterday it's old.
• whodey

  •

  6 years ago

  A week if the club has other reviews recently. If it's a club that hasn't been reviewed more than a handful of times a year I can see accepting a review that was a month old just to add to the sparce info available. Anything over a month shouldn't bother being written.
• shadowcat

  •

  6 years ago

  That depends on how often the club gets reviewed. For Hong Kong 7 days is plenty. For a club on Guam, I'd say six months unless there is newer reviews.
• Jascoi

  •

  6 years ago

  I still stick to yesterday.
• Papi_Chulo

  •

  6 years ago

  On avg one month, the club's vibe is not gonna change that drastically in a month
• JuiceBox69

  •

  6 years ago

  A think a month is the biggest gap that should be allowed
  
  One could do like I do at some local clubs
  
  You could club all year then write one big review for that year.. that's acceptable because it's a summary of the club and how it was for that year
  
  But if the guy made one visit last year then write the review today lol what did it take a year to get inspired LMFAO.... reject that shit
  
  It's probably just a shit excuse to write a fake review and get that VIP passes to read reviews... trust me I know about passing fake reviews LMFAO
• shailynn

  •

  6 years ago

  oh conundrum, how I love that wine. both the white and the red.
• rockie

  •

  6 years ago

  Conundrom: There are clubs on this forum that are open and functioning that haven't received a review in 16 months or more. A decent review posted a month after a visit could certainly be relevant and enlightening.
• Jascoi

  •

  6 years ago

  I'll give you that.
  somethings better than nothing.