Reviews that are too old

IMO, if the visit happened more than a week ago, then a review should not be written.

7 days.

7 days.

if it didn't happen yesterday it's old.

A week if the club has other reviews recently. If it's a club that hasn't been reviewed more than a handful of times a year I can see accepting a review that was a month old just to add to the sparce info available. Anything over a month shouldn't bother being written.

That depends on how often the club gets reviewed. For Hong Kong 7 days is plenty. For a club on Guam, I'd say six months unless there is newer reviews.

I still stick to yesterday.

On avg one month, the club's vibe is not gonna change that drastically in a month

A think a month is the biggest gap that should be allowed

One could do like I do at some local clubs

You could club all year then write one big review for that year.. that's acceptable because it's a summary of the club and how it was for that year

But if the guy made one visit last year then write the review today lol what did it take a year to get inspired LMFAO.... reject that shit

It's probably just a shit excuse to write a fake review and get that VIP passes to read reviews... trust me I know about passing fake reviews LMFAO

oh conundrum, how I love that wine. both the white and the red.

Conundrom: There are clubs on this forum that are open and functioning that haven't received a review in 16 months or more. A decent review posted a month after a visit could certainly be relevant and enlightening.

I'll give you that.
somethings better than nothing.