Blue Checkmark Verification?

22 comments

• Call.Me.Ishmael

  •

  6 years ago

  No. Those verification marks are to guarantee that a person's identity is known. That's really the exact opposite of what a lot of people here want.
• founder

  •

  6 years ago

  Exactly my thoughts
• Call.Me.Ishmael

  •

  6 years ago

  I suspect that someone is looking for a "not a troll" verification mark. Good luck with that...
• ppwh

  •

  6 years ago

  Twitter's checkmark is more "adheres to the authorized groupthink" I have heard that IG doesn't allow nudity, so I don't know much of anything about that site. Either way, I like the vouched-for idea (whether displayed publicly or not) better than a "founder's pet" checkmark.
• shadowcat

  •

  6 years ago

  NO need.
• GACA

  •

  6 years ago

  I still like the ignored count idea
• jackslash

  •

  6 years ago

  No.
• twentyfive

  •

  6 years ago

  Sounds like a millennial idea, so no
• san_jose_guy

  •

  6 years ago

  Needs to stay open and anonymous, those are its strengths and those are its essentials. SJG
• Papi_Chulo

  •

  6 years ago

  Sounds gay - not that there's anything wrong with that
• Cashman1234

  •

  6 years ago

  I think it’s useless for us pl’s. The less verification for us - the better. However, it might be useful to have verification for the dancers. Since the dancer directory seems a bit loose - it wouldn’t hurt to have a process to verify the dancer identities. Maybe a green check - or a dollar bill...
• ppwh

  •

  6 years ago

  > Since the dancer directory seems a bit loose - it wouldn’t hurt to have a process to verify the dancer identities. Maybe a green check - or a dollar bill... ✓ Tits verified on Skype!
• Cashman1234

  •

  6 years ago

  Nice ppwh!
• s275ironman

  •

  6 years ago

  I vote no. If the purpose is to tell the difference between legit users and trolls, I don’t think verification is necessary. Those of use who read and post regularly are able to make our own judgment who is legit and who is a troll.
• math14

  •

  6 years ago

  I agree, “NO” thank you please. Thanks for asking.
• san_jose_guy

  •

  6 years ago

  Login problem does seem to be solved. After you login, you are taken to exactly where you were. Thank you Founder, SJG
• BurlingtonHoFactory

  •

  6 years ago

  I don't use Twitter or IG, so I'm not even sure how their verification process works. How would it work on TUSCL? Would we have to voice-verify one time over the phone or something?
• rh48hr

  •

  6 years ago

  No
• Trucidos

  •

  6 years ago

  Wow there are some butthurt lonely old men with to much time on their hands. We have actively maybe 100 users. Are you fucking kidding me?
• PrimetimeSchein

  •

  6 years ago

  Real TUSCL mongers know who are the trolls versus the sources of Expertise
• ime

  •

  6 years ago

  TUSCL should maybe have blue waffle verification...google it
• Lord_Cthulhu

  •

  6 years ago

  Yes, definitely, Founding One. All members should be required to post their real name, photo, and bio info, just as I have done. In addition, for dancers, posting club, schedule, and menu with prices should be mandatory.