Blue Checkmark Verification?

avatar for founder
founder
slip a dollar in her g-string for me
Is there any reason at all tuscl needs a verification process like twitter or IG? I can't think of one, but someone suggested it, so I'll throw it out there for discussion.

22 comments

Jump to latest
avatar for Call.Me.Ishmael
Call.Me.Ishmael
7 years ago
No. Those verification marks are to guarantee that a person's identity is known. That's really the exact opposite of what a lot of people here want.
avatar for founder
founder
7 years ago
Exactly my thoughts
avatar for Call.Me.Ishmael
Call.Me.Ishmael
7 years ago
I suspect that someone is looking for a "not a troll" verification mark.

Good luck with that...
avatar for ppwh
ppwh
7 years ago
Twitter's checkmark is more "adheres to the authorized groupthink"

I have heard that IG doesn't allow nudity, so I don't know much of anything about that site.

Either way, I like the vouched-for idea (whether displayed publicly or not) better than a "founder's pet" checkmark.
avatar for shadowcat
shadowcat
7 years ago
NO need.
avatar for GACA
GACA
7 years ago
I still like the ignored count idea
avatar for jackslash
jackslash
7 years ago
No.
avatar for twentyfive
twentyfive
7 years ago
Sounds like a millennial idea, so no
avatar for san_jose_guy
san_jose_guy
7 years ago
Needs to stay open and anonymous, those are its strengths and those are its essentials.

SJG
avatar for Papi_Chulo
Papi_Chulo
7 years ago
Sounds gay - not that there's anything wrong with that
avatar for Cashman1234
Cashman1234
7 years ago
I think it’s useless for us pl’s. The less verification for us - the better.

However, it might be useful to have verification for the dancers. Since the dancer directory seems a bit loose - it wouldn’t hurt to have a process to verify the dancer identities. Maybe a green check - or a dollar bill...
avatar for ppwh
ppwh
7 years ago
> Since the dancer directory seems a bit loose - it wouldn’t hurt to have a process to verify the dancer identities. Maybe a green check - or a dollar bill...

✓ Tits verified on Skype!

avatar for Cashman1234
Cashman1234
7 years ago
Nice ppwh!
avatar for s275ironman
s275ironman
7 years ago
I vote no. If the purpose is to tell the difference between legit users and trolls, I don’t think verification is necessary. Those of use who read and post regularly are able to make our own judgment who is legit and who is a troll.
avatar for math14
math14
7 years ago
I agree, “NO” thank you please. Thanks for asking.
avatar for san_jose_guy
san_jose_guy
7 years ago
Login problem does seem to be solved. After you login, you are taken to exactly where you were.

Thank you Founder,
SJG
avatar for BurlingtonHoFactory
BurlingtonHoFactory
7 years ago
I don't use Twitter or IG, so I'm not even sure how their verification process works. How would it work on TUSCL? Would we have to voice-verify one time over the phone or something?
avatar for rh48hr
rh48hr
7 years ago
No
avatar for Trucidos
Trucidos
7 years ago
Wow there are some butthurt lonely old men with to much time on their hands. We have actively maybe 100 users. Are you fucking kidding me?
avatar for PrimetimeSchein
PrimetimeSchein
7 years ago
Real TUSCL mongers know who are the trolls versus the sources of Expertise
avatar for ime
ime
7 years ago
TUSCL should maybe have blue waffle verification...google it
avatar for Lord_Cthulhu
Lord_Cthulhu
7 years ago
Yes, definitely, Founding One. All members should be required to post their real name, photo, and bio info, just as I have done. In addition, for dancers, posting club, schedule, and menu with prices should be mandatory.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now