"Norkum argued that Fletcher was guilty of the tort of deceit by expressing love for him when she actually considered the relationship nothing more than an exchange of money for sex, companionship and availability. He claimed that the deceit included a secret affair with another man, her business dealing with the other man and the other man’s active parenting of her twins."
Maybe it’s just luck on that guy’s/pl’s part? When I say luck - I mean that the pl got lucky to have a judge who got misled by a stripper too - answhonstill harbors some anger towards strippers in general?
It’s difficult to recuse yourself from the proceedings - when your reasons are - you were a regular customer of Dusty Busty at the Landing Strip until she decided to cut you off!
Finally - a ROB gets held accountable - yeah he was stupid but most un-knowledgeable SCers are easy-targets for experienced strippers and many strippers take advantage of this
Seems fair. He gets back the real estate and she gets to keep the gifts and cash given to her. When it comes to pussy, all common sense goes out the window.
It’s so fucked up - as the house was bought with money the pl paid the dancer (when working for his company) - then the renovations were paid for by the pl too. It must be a very nice house - after $1.1 million in renovations!
10 comments
It’s difficult to recuse yourself from the proceedings - when your reasons are - you were a regular customer of Dusty Busty at the Landing Strip until she decided to cut you off!
It’s so fucked up - as the house was bought with money the pl paid the dancer (when working for his company) - then the renovations were paid for by the pl too. It must be a very nice house - after $1.1 million in renovations!