No such thing as beta males, but rather only dumbasses
future POTUS and Senator in training
Given what i have seen discussed on this site as well as in other places, there is no such thing as a beta male.
Yes, there are unconfident men, but they are not beta, they are solely not confident.
Similarly, there are very respectful gentlemen who are very able to "get" many girls (being generous/respectful does not inherently delegitimze a man's flirting ability) . However, despite the latter category of men that are able to have strong "pull game" , this group is ignorantly misconstrued as "beta". This is a beautiful contradiction. While many men frequently define alpha/beta on the basis of eligibility to attract many women, the same men call other men who are respectful to women as beta, despite the fact that "beta " males do have the ability to "pull" more women (extent to whether or not that ability is actualized is a different story, but it can be and has been done many times).
Moral of the story: no such thing as beta males, but rather uneducated men who misconstrue gentlemen for "beta" merely because they attract the attention of women in a way that is not misogynistic. Such a tactic is not beta, but rather the way it is supposed to be done.
Side note: hitting/speaking on women assertively is not to be confused to aggressiveness, which is disgusting as fuck and the kind of men i love pushing far the fuck away from me.
-this post has been pretty clear, so dont think ill need 2 repsond 2 any comments.
Yes, there are unconfident men, but they are not beta, they are solely not confident.
Similarly, there are very respectful gentlemen who are very able to "get" many girls (being generous/respectful does not inherently delegitimze a man's flirting ability) . However, despite the latter category of men that are able to have strong "pull game" , this group is ignorantly misconstrued as "beta". This is a beautiful contradiction. While many men frequently define alpha/beta on the basis of eligibility to attract many women, the same men call other men who are respectful to women as beta, despite the fact that "beta " males do have the ability to "pull" more women (extent to whether or not that ability is actualized is a different story, but it can be and has been done many times).
Moral of the story: no such thing as beta males, but rather uneducated men who misconstrue gentlemen for "beta" merely because they attract the attention of women in a way that is not misogynistic. Such a tactic is not beta, but rather the way it is supposed to be done.
Side note: hitting/speaking on women assertively is not to be confused to aggressiveness, which is disgusting as fuck and the kind of men i love pushing far the fuck away from me.
-this post has been pretty clear, so dont think ill need 2 repsond 2 any comments.
Comments
last commentAnd @ ppwh, I love soyboys! They are the only men who you can send to the grocery store! ❤️❤️
There *are* beta males, just as there are beta females. They’re followers, seldom taking the lead, and then only temporarily and with their alpha’s permission, tacit or explicit. They don’t usually assert themselves, and not always because they cannot, but because they’re just more comfortable doing what the alpha wants them to do.
http://en.wikimannia.org/Gamma…
His posts about his law journal - and beta males - while fantasizing about being ass fucked by a Serena Williams tranny - are quite lengthy and dull!
If Bj adds a no punctuation up charge - Nick won’t be able to afford those new pumps he’s been eyeing at Marshall’s!
SJG
Maybe SJG doesn’t mind dropping the soap in the shower...
SJG
SJG