review process = few comments?

9 comments

• TFP

  •

  6 years ago

  I don't think so. It does seem like there are fewer comments though. Not sure why.
• Warrior15

  •

  6 years ago

  Maybe the comments you put on the Publishment should be posted as a comment on the Review .
• abqspencer

  •

  6 years ago

  There ya go, Warrior, that would make them more meaningful (to me at least).
• twentyfive

  •

  6 years ago

  @founder @warrior made a good suggestion maybe the comments you are collecting with the published reviews should be published along with the reviews.
• TFP

  •

  6 years ago

  If they did that I'd have a whole lot of 'Sufficient', 'Good info', and 'Great review' comments. That's all I ever write. Unless the review is phenomenal, which I've only seen about 3 of those. I like those pending reviews I read where I can tell exactly who wrote it due to the writing style. For example, I reviewed one of a club in CT and just a paragraph in and I knew it was my buddy Orangepicture. Didn't even need to read the rest, just scrolled down and clicked yes.
• Warrior15

  •

  6 years ago

  Maybe have a box to check if you want the comment to be public.
• TheeOSU

  •

  6 years ago

  ^ I like that idea.
• chessmaster

  •

  6 years ago

  Definitely DO NOT put the comments from the unpublished reviews in the review. Like tfp i have been filling that in with canned responses. The site is constantly changing and founder is always doing something new. Who knows what founder has in mind.
• Huntsman

  •

  6 years ago

  My stock comment is “useful” if I vote yes. That’s both how I look to approve and it’s my way of saving time. If a review is actually one that I think is very good, I say something different. So the comment on screening unpublished reviews is different than when I want to comment about a published review. At least that’s true for me.