TUSCL March Challenge

Recommended number of dances from the winner is: Two. After that call it a day. Best use of $50 and established goodwill for next visit.

I"m thinking that after the two of them do their dances for each other, then take them both to VIP. That might be one glorious threesome.

Warrior - what a thought! Both are primed with that foreplay and some honest customer feedback. Agree with ya

I don't think that I want to mess with telling one dancer that she is better than another. Especially if the other is standing right there. You never know how good each would be with you alone. You might lose out.

This sounds like way too much work for too little return. Why wouldn’t I just invite them to my room after work, or before their shift the next day?

Did LDK82 pass the “challenge” torch on to you? I want to know if this is an official TUSCL sanctioned challenge first before I participate.

I like that these challenges are LDK style money. So it fit a variety of budgets (ie mine). :) @Rogertex, this sounds like a fun challenge. Lots of goodwill and sexy fun for roughly $50 all-in.

PS: from Feb challenge. Now that you mentioned it maybe one of the brazen wanna dance dancers could have tried that. I can almost hear it in one of their voices. I was probably too busy LOLing from her wanna dance that I don’t even remember it. I was sort of a huge dick back then. I was thinking more in the context of a dancer whom I was interesting in buying or tipping asking for a tip (like the girls on stripper web say to do). Also I wasn’t counting the original stage shows where prior to LDs being common a dancer might do a 5 song stage show. Many of then before they would start stripping would prod the audience to tip. She’d have a crystal glass or a crystal bowl on stage to hold the tips. She would some minimum in mind —$10 or $20 total from all the guys — before she take clothes off. Then part of the show would be her performing to increase tips and audience participation. That seems quaint now that a live stripping female would be a big deal to generate anything like tipping in the old days. These days it’s hard enough to separate guys with a $1 for a tip.

Dominic - I'm glad those quaint days are behind us. I even heard some strip clubs had a 2 feet rule - so not only an air dance - but a minimum two feet away. Anyways, I have stopped tipping for service that is standard in my hoods. Dancer has to earn every buck.

shailynn - LDK will always be the king of ... er, LDKs and yes, challenges. Lately, he seems to be off to bigger projects if you check his recent posts.

But yes this challenge is officially approved, endorsed, sanctioned by the great TUSCL board of regents - the supreme authority on naked women. In fact the regents only rule is - if it's good for you, it's approved, go for it.

So get yourself a couple of butt flappin damsels next time you visit your club and have them dance off. But be fair when judging!

GMD - why not - invite them - but that would be a bigger challenge. And more power to you. If a TUSCLer follows the March challenge recipe, there a 75% or better chance of good times and fun. (yeah - a club could have an asshole for a manager that does not allow two dancers showing off on an unused side stage, etc etc)

But having the dancers agree to continue the party OTC - well we've got GMD to take it from there.

SC - go ahead tell em who is better, you will be fine! Unless dancers do view SC as the supreme authority on good and bad dancers. And each takes it to heart and the loser is devastated.

In my case - I tell the dancers I have a PhD in "naked women dancing" and I'm the best judge. Dancers go - whatever, as long as this guy is throwing money and appreciating us.

I like this challenge. It provides the customer with a very good benefit. The view could be mind-blowing! If the dancers are actually worked up - they might be wild in vip.

This is a useful challenge. It’s not like a strip club version of impractical jokers.

Roger, we have a 2 feet rule here for topless and nude.

I sort of miss the ole quaint days because it felt like dancers were performers and entertainers instead of just extras girls or otc girls. It seems kind of sad to be that the invisible hand of the market forces the hand of prostitution. Kind of sad. But it’s what the guys want.

But as they say, when in Rome ... ;)

I’ll jump off my noble pervert soapbox now. I do recognize the fallacy that I’m really no better than you guys.

Dominic - all I'll say is sex is noble and good - with or without money involved. The only requirements should be (a) consenting (b) adults

If our society focused on the above two and only the above two - they would really be enforced resulting in much lower rapes, assaults and child trafficking.

By labeling sex for money (prostitution) a vice and making it illegal - most of LE resources, time and energy goes towards busting lonely John's and their amorous interests - while the real crimes continue - Rapes and Child Trafficking.