Nepals. Another failure of the ranking system.
shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
Nepals now ranked #2 on the top ten. I have been watching it climb over the last few weeks. I consider it to be just another failure of the rating system by numbers. It shouldn't even be in the top 40 rated clubs. I have always been a firm believer in knowing your reviewers. If one of my TUSCL brothers posts a review, I believe it because I know him.
Casualguy: I know that you know this club. Does it rate this ranking?
Casualguy: I know that you know this club. Does it rate this ranking?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
45 comments
I agree 99.873%. The thing I find especially ludicrous is providing averages to 3 significnat digits when the original data hasa only one significant digit. But then wasn't baseball doing that long before computers came along and screwed up our lives?
I have to look it up on the FAQ every single time I am checking a set of clubs' overall ranks ... erm, I mean, ratings ... erm, I mean, umm, levels of relative quality. One of them is more recent, one of them is longer term.
Why not call them, "Shorter-term ranking" and "Longer-term ranking" instead? Or "Rating: recently" and "Rating: overall"? Anything to alleviate the confusion.
In Founder's defense, the answer to the question, "Which is which?" is readily found right there on the FAQ. Umm. I think ...
That's how I scored it, and within a half point of how it has averaged with others. Whoop De Fucking Doo! Some controversy we have here.
If so, then the solution is easy: Stop comparing. The only problem with rankings is people expecting them to mean anything. Everywhere you look nowadays - newspapers, TV, websites - you see statisical reports in the form of Top 10 or Top 100 lists simply because computers can spit them out easily. At best, they can make for diverting junk reading.
TUSCL displays club rankings as a numbered list because it can. Period. Who cares whether one set of reviewers in South Carolina rate a club a fraction of a point higher than a different set of reviewers in Texas or Ontario rate their clubs? You know the people working there couldn't give a shit.
Chandler, what I described took place in one of their VIP rooms maybe 7-8 years ago, where a bouncer peeked in once in awhile, which was just about the only thing I didn't like about Nepals. It was my first visit and I didn't know the rules, which sometimes can be a good thing. It was one of those times where I asked the girl what the rules were and she said she didn't care what I did as long as no one was watching, at least I think that's what she said. She had a very strong accent so it was hard to understand her, which may have helped. I usually try to obey the rules but when you don't know what they are it can add to the fun.
A glance at the Top 10 shows that the #1 club is topless and the #3 club is non alcohol. I'm sure there are many people who think there's no way those should be in the Top 10. I happen to think the #9 club doesn't belong because of their fuglies, but so be it.
I don't believe anybody can judge a club very well without going there. Based on reviews I had read, I was doubting that I would enjoy the dances at Nepals, but they were very good. The contact before and after the dances wasn't bad, either. I'm glad I went, and so are some other people.
I would really like more nude clubs with several good looking dancers.
I don't really think the rating system is that bad. It's more like the people visiting haven't had a really bad experience yet and must be getting what they expected. There are some hot looking girls working there as well. At least one comes to mind to me right now. I think I've seen several hot looking girls in the summertime at the beach clubs though. Nepals isn't the 2nd best club in the nation but it's nice to know I'm so powerful in the rating system. lol, :) just joking.
BTW, Book Guy, what club are you talking about?
Those criteria should just be ... standard fare. They don't merit rating the club a 10 on the basis of them alone. But dudes who haven't been around, get all excited.
As for Alicia, this is about the third time you've told me this, and each time I've replied that you must have me confused with somebody else. All I ever said about Alicia is how much I liked her dances. I never said she was a lesbian, or whether she was married. I don't remember whether she told me one way or another.
I like Nepals as a decent local club but I never claimed it was one of the best in the nation. I've rated it this past year from 6 to 8 which averages to 7. Just love this controversy. I usually rate Platinum Plus clubs higher in case no one noticed.
I first visited PP in Columbia about 10 years ago and was a regular there for a while. It got crowded on the weekends just like it does now. There was also a nude club in Columbia I liked to visit but I stopped visiting and less than a year later after that they closed. The nude club got crowded as well. Not sure why they closed but something happened to tick me off and make me stop visiting. Probably stopped visiting Columbia clubs at the same time.