Forget about SJG vs. Alucard that someone posted about awhile back. For better or worse Alucard [Dracula] is dead.
The new battle of loquaciousness [wits?] is between Book Man & SJG with each bumping the other's threads -- who's gonna win the battle of bullshit?
Sorry, SJG but repeating boilerplate -- 'chumps game'; 'f2f' and the same urls doesn't count. And a post that approaches true wit or wisdom puts either of you in the '24hr penalty box' -- out of the game.
"Imagine what it would be like to be able to spend time regularly"[1] on TUSCL reading entertaining posts and busting balls without stumbling over their verbose commentaries. What if they confined their epic posts only to each other's discussion topics.
[1. SJG] A Beautiful World Within Our Reach? [2. Book Man] Bed Bugs? not necessarily OT: So, tell me about how to get rid of bed-bug bites, bed bugs, and all you know about them.
Nah, just a nightmare.
Oy!, just another example of.......... Man plans; God laughs
With humorous sarcasm, AK


Replies (9)Latest
"verbal diarrhea contest"
That's funny as hell and 100% correct.
Your auto correct must be acting up again. It's Book Guy...not Man. :)
SC, got me! I meant Book Guy not to be confused with Book_Guy or Bookman, the type font.
No, can't blame it on 'autocorrect'; it's 100% brain fart late at night by an old fart.
AK
Have to agree, the title is brilliant!
Maybe he was talking about Bookman the janitor from "Good Times"
48, thanks for trying to make it sound like an 'intelligent mistake'.
In fact, I was writing this while trying to do other tasks.
Can't multi-task at my age :-(
One more auto correct.
You wrote "battle of wits."
It should have been "battle of twits."
Yeah Hawk, but I didn't want to sound "too negative" :-P
SJG has reached the level of "fag" and is working very hard on becoming a "total faggot" but it is work for him. BookGuy isn't nearly as bad. Is merely "gay".
After_Knocker96, so what's your angle here, just didn't make it to the toilet in time?
SJG
Join the conversation
Sign in to reply to this discussion.