I know that, in the past, we've had threads about who TUSCL'ers think are most similar to them. How about the other way around? Who on TUSCL do your regard as closest to your diametric opposite?
I don't know you guys that well yet but I'm going to say georgemicrodong because he has an unfortunate handle like mine but we clearly have different senses of humor!
I figured he was a troll because who would call themselves microdong? Of course I impulsively picked 4got2wipe! Maybe that wasn't brilliant!
Anyway, I realized he was ignoring me because I tried to PM to ask what I had done to offend him! Then I he said he was ignoring 70 or 80 people on another thread! I didn't even know there were 70 people posting! Who isn't he ignoring? ;)
Meyers-Briggs is extremely interesting, most of all I say this because to me it just feels right.
But as far as a diametric opposite on TUSCL, it depends on what you select as the axis of opposition. MB gives four potential axes. But as far as the things talked about on TUSCL, there could be many more mirrors that we each are being reflected in. The longer I am on, the more I am finding aspects of affinity with people where I had before thought there was none.
12 comments
Latest
I figured he was a troll because who would call themselves microdong? Of course I impulsively picked 4got2wipe! Maybe that wasn't brilliant!
Anyway, I realized he was ignoring me because I tried to PM to ask what I had done to offend him! Then I he said he was ignoring 70 or 80 people on another thread! I didn't even know there were 70 people posting! Who isn't he ignoring? ;)
But as far as a diametric opposite on TUSCL, it depends on what you select as the axis of opposition. MB gives four potential axes. But as far as the things talked about on TUSCL, there could be many more mirrors that we each are being reflected in. The longer I am on, the more I am finding aspects of affinity with people where I had before thought there was none.
SJG
Would you care to elaborate?
SJG