Bad news for Kansas clubbers.

shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
Kansas lawmakers weighed adopting tougher restrictions on strip clubs and adult book stores, including a ban on full nudity at strip clubs and a ban against building a “sexually oriented business” within 1,000 feet of schools and houses of worship.

The bill, which was reviewed Tuesday by the Senate Committee on Corrections and Juvenile Justice, is identical to a Missouri law, which was upheld by the Missouri Supreme Court in 2011.

Senate Bill 147 would prevent strip clubs from being open between midnight and 6 a.m. or to serve alcoholic beverages.

Phillip Cosby, executive director of the American Family Association of Kansas & Missouri, argued that the bill’s provisions were reasonable regulations to place on an industry he called toxic to communities.










"These are flesh peddlers. These are merchants of misery,” he said.

Philip Bradley, lobbyist for the Equal Entertainment Group, which represents strip clubs, called the bill “overreach regulation searching for a problem the doesn’t exist.”

He said that many communities in the state, including Sedgwick County, have adopted their own laws to regulate the industry. “Local regulation works,” he said.

He said that taking away alcohol sales and closing clubs by midnight, their most profitable hours, would put many clubs out of business. He argued this was the intent of the bill and that it would cost the state of Kansas more than $1 million in tax revenue and about 1,000 jobs.

Christine McDonald, a program director at Restoration House of Greater Kansas City, an organization that helps survivors of sex trafficking, testified that she was recruited to work in a strip club as a minor in the 1980s.




She argued that legal sex industry often intertwines with the illegal sex trade and that eliminating alcohol would make clubs safer for the women who work there.

Sen. Tom Arpke, R-Salina, the bill’s main proponent in the Legislature, said that as a Republican he supports limited government, but that he considers this industry an area that should be regulated. He noted that Kansas Republican Party’s platform opposes pornography in all forms.

8 comments

Latest

deogol
10 years ago
Prohibition.

They can make programs that interact with strip clubs or strippers - such as the licensing requirement. That aids in removing sex slaves from the picture. (Though it is a nuisance for dancers and makes starting up that more expensive and a slew of other shit...)

The government cannot make programs that interact with underground sex clubs.
rockstar666
10 years ago
It's up to the people of Kansas. They elected these guys. If they don't like what they're doing they should vote for someone else.
Papi_Chulo
10 years ago
It seems more and more like we’re going backwards w.r.t. SCs and sex attitudes in general.
JamesSD
10 years ago
How the fuck can the anti porn party be in power anywhere? Jesus christ. Republicans are "awesome".
deogol
10 years ago
Well, the same happened in Afghanistan and Egypt. Western dressed women were the majority years ago. Now they all wear burkas. It's nice to know where we are going.
looneylarry
10 years ago
With Missouri clamping down, it was only a matter of time before Kansas followed suit. Shadowcat, more bad news on top of more bad news. Just about ready to turn in my clubber card.
dw.buck
10 years ago
Funny republicans are all about de-regulation and smaller government except when it conflicts with what they want, and how to control people. fukking with repubs we will all be under sharia law and the rule of ISIS
DandyDan
10 years ago
This is why I don't like Republicans. They claim to be for limited government, but then they act like strip clubs are a life or death problem to the community. Of all the bars in a state, I suspect the percentage which are strip clubs account for approximately .0001% of all the bars, so how much of a nuisance can strip clubs really be?
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion