OT: Mobius Says China’s Bull Market Is Just Getting Started
Dougster
"Mark Mobius, executive chairman of Templeton Emerging Markets Group, said he’s been buying Chinese stocks “across the board,” including oil-related companies, on expectations that crude prices will recover from five-year lows"
But stevie-girl said China would lead the way down with its "mere" 6-7% growth lately. So what's up with this guy saying the bull market is just getting started? I guess he needs to read stevie-girl's posts here to realize he doesn't know WTF he is talking about. The reality is that China is absolutely DOOMED! Because stevie-girl said so.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
14 comments
Latest
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=039Zh9KB…
SJG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKO5eIdj…
SJG
I'm actually going to set aside the 1:20 to watch that video, just because I want to learn more and see if she could be the next president.
This cannot be the way our country should be going. Our Democracy depends on working people being able to support themselves.
It is hard to stop busts, but we can decline to boost for the booms.
SJG
Stones, 1998
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aykU1j2…
I also wonder what kind of a start I would have got just as a worker bee if I hadn't walked into a couple of booms.
Yes, lots of people do benefit from booms, but far more get nothing, and many end up worse off than before. I am glad that some of them helped you along. But the simple fact is that far more people are working in absolutely intolerable employment situations than there have ever been since the Gilded Age. Our democracy does not work when it is just rich versus a poor who can barely survive. Working people need to be able to support themselves, or democracy collapses. These booms, really Ponzi schemes, do not help this.
SJG
Well that's a good argument of why we need busts as well. But those entrepreneurs and those funding them are look like ahead to the boom for the pay off. So we need booms as well.
Also even if a steady climb was more desirable than boom/bust cycles what practical way is there to get to that?
Things get funded which should not. Money is even drawn away from things which are very worthwhile.
Then once they see that the king had no clothes, then all the money dries up and people who are doing good things get hurt a second time.
As the bust continues, good things start to happen again.
But what we need is less speculators, less people trying to get a claim on the future productivity of our nation by using gimmicks. Both the booms and the busts are themselves gimmicks.
This is about Kliener Perkins, a very unflattering portrayal, but one I can fully endorse by personal experience with them.
http://www.amazon.com/Money-No-Object-Ve…
Most of the money which these guys represent is Gilded Age money too.
Doug Henwood, online book, How Wall Street Works and for Whom
http://ebookscentral.com/book/62446/wall…
SJG
The Cure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYafISYc…
2013