Obviously a dancer's mission is to create a illusion of attraction designed to make a PL hand over all their cash to them.
They all have some type of hustle to accomplish this. It is their job. That is how they pay their bills.
But, is there a line when they go too far? Is all hustle (within the law) free game or is there a line that even dancers should not cross?
For example, would it be wrong for a dancer to make a slightly retarded guy think she's loves him and have him fork over every last dime? How about some dude with dementia? Of course these sound black and white but there are dozens of scenario's that are pretty grey.
When do you think a hustle is just part of the biz or when does it cross some undefined line? Anything against the law would be over the line but how about lying about needed car repairs to some love struck kid?


Surely you're not implying that ANYTHING against the law is over the line, 'cos that would disappoint most of the pervs on this site.
But seriously, I would say that taking advantage of anybody with dementia or a severe mental defect is despicable. But telling a weirdo apart from a mental defective. Was tux dude in Chili Palmer's story losing it or just a weird dude having fun in his own way?
I would also think that the stripper wouldn't want to cross that line out of self preservation. From a stripper's standpoint, a dude that REALLY thinks she's in love with him could get scary. One thing to lead a PL along and think you might give him more (or cheaper) fun...another thing to convince a dude with a tenuous grasp on reality that you really love him. The latter could go south real fast ...