Does flagging reviews make a difference?
Mistoff
Washington
I flag about a review every three weeks. Liars who obviously haven't been to the club. Claiming a shower dance, claiming they went to the VIP room in a club that doesn't have one. Always first-time reviewers.
Do the mods take any action on these? Does it matter? Or should we all lie together?
Do the mods take any action on these? Does it matter? Or should we all lie together?
12 comments
TUSCL is a one-man operation (Founder) – and I think TUSCL is side-thing for him?
I recall PMing Founder a few weeks back w.r.t. flagged reviews and he said he was running behind on them.
I was wondering about a recent review for platinum plus in Greenville. A $25 cover is higher than I ever heard and I only paid $10 on Saturday night. Inaccurate information makes me wonder if they even visited.
Now there are 100+ reviews submitted every day. There is no way 1 person could read all of those reviews and know if they were factual or not. So Founder came up with the flag system to alert him to bull shit reviews.
I doubt that he makes enough off of the site to hire anyone to help out. So improvements are on hold until he has the time to deal with them.
Like others, I mostly only flag for reviews that contain factual misrepresentations of the club or that were clearly copied. Things like cover/parking charges, CR/Dance price errors, inaccurate club descriptions, etc. I really don't care about someone else getting credit, I just don't like the idea of people going to a club with misguided expectations. It's happened to me a few times and I find it quite annoying.
ONLY if the reviews get DELETED.