Is there a Statute of Limitations for how long after you visit you can post a re

6 years? Damn, I'd say that's passed the expiration date.

And I'd say its past the expiration date

I'd say more than 30 days is too late. Did anyone flag this review? (I'm only a standard member at the moment, so I can't flag it.) The club could have even changed names, and had three turnovers of dancers in six years.

Maybe the first sentence was meant to read, "I first went to this club six years ago . . ." followed by details that bring it up to date.

Hell, I think a week or two is too late personally. I wanted to do one for a visit to one of my regular clubs I made two weeks ago, and I still haven't done it, and now I forgot most of what I wanted to write. Maybe I'll have to go back.

How the hell did this review get accepted?

Slick - Reviews are NOT screened before being published as a general rule ex length is monitored automatically. Founder is a one man show and does not have time to read the 100+ reviews that he gets most days. He relies on the flag feature to alert him to bad reviews.

Understandable.

I'm good within a 30 day window. After that it becomes hard to remember the who what where why how.

If six years is ok, I could write tons of reviews from over 15 years ago. I'm sure it will be realistic, lol.

I remember visiting club, zxcvvbb, 17 years ago. I'm sure it hasn't changed. It's a small club, saw maybe 15 dancers working on. a Saturday night. Lots of 6's, 7's, and 8's. Dances were good. I got a lot of them. Tipped a few dollars on their main stage and the dancers came right over. Had fun. Went back several times when I lived there.

Looks like the review has been removed.

I read this thread a day after it was posted and when I clicked on the link; nothing came up – thus I assume review was removed.