Naming names in reviews?

14 comments

• Alucard

  •

  11 years ago

  NO! Yes! Yes! Read the fine print below.
• Club_Goer_Seattle

  •

  11 years ago

  New members frequently ask this question. Founder frowns upon it. See his "Review Submission Guide," posted 1/1/2008: [view link] In particular, see the third paragraph, last sentence: "Just be careful not to mention names if it may get your ATF in trouble." Generally, reviwers abide by this. However, when it comes to outting a ROB, then it is customary to name her in a review.
• dallas702

  •

  11 years ago

  ROB = yes, if she is mean. Dream girl, DFK, all the good extras = are you kidding? Not only is it bad form, who wants to let others in on a good thing and risk her raising prices?
• lopaw

  •

  11 years ago

  Extras girls? Never. ROBs? Always. I figure that often dancers will give different customers different mileage, so it's very subjective. OTOH, ROB's aren't as discriminate and tend to rip off everyone equally.
• gawker

  •

  11 years ago

  If there's a compelling reason to name a dancer I use a PM.
• SuperDude

  •

  11 years ago

  Depending on your locoation, you might, by giving a name, expose the dancer or the club to LE activity.
• SlickSpic

  •

  11 years ago

  Never say what she did. If she's a ROB, let us know. Otherwise, just say she's good, you had a good time, etc. no details. Don't fuck up a good thing.
• jerikson40

  •

  11 years ago

  The CORRECT way to provide PL's with useful information on specific dancers, while making it virtually impossible for LE to understand what is being described is to use the "asterisk code". For example, let's say the name of the dancer who gave you bareback blow job, cum in mouth, and swallow, then full service bareback, was named Carol. The correct way to identify her, while keeping LE clueless about who you are referring to, is to call her "C*arol". Or if her name is Princess, you identify her as "Pr*ncess". That's who the smart and savvy reviewers do it.
• StripReviewer

  •

  11 years ago

  Yeah, wasn't talking about extras, just a bad dance. Not gonna bother after all since she had technical proficiency, just didn't like the dead silence.
• deogol

  •

  11 years ago

  <i> The CORRECT way to provide PL's with useful information on specific dancers, while making it virtually impossible for LE to understand what is being described is to use the "asterisk code". For example, let's say the name of the dancer who gave you bareback blow job, cum in mouth, and swallow, then full service bareback, was named Carol. The correct way to identify her, while keeping LE clueless about who you are referring to, is to call her "C*arol". Or if her name is Princess, you identify her as "Pr*ncess". That's who the smart and savvy reviewers do it. </i> LOL
• scatterbrain

  •

  11 years ago

  Everything written on this site should be considered a work of fiction.
• Alucard

  •

  11 years ago

  You should use more than 1 asterisk deogol. Guess you AREN'T smart and savvy.
• Lack4Oars

  •

  11 years ago

  Lol I can see the police now: "damn, this guy wrote the girls name out as c*arol. We'll never crack this case now!"
• Tiredtraveler

  •

  11 years ago

  The only time you should use a specific name is for a ROB.