Mileage and cleavage

Haven't noticed any correlation, had acr. the spectrum mlg.

Strip club related, non-troll and non-troll feeding thread, so BUMP!

Good points all, Chandler. I will be the first to admit that when I see a really good looking stripper I'm usually on guard looking for signs of attitude. And maybe I prefer the young ones because I feel more at ease with them, I expect the older ones to be phony.

The fake boobs I've run into have too often been cold to the touch and sometimes rock hard. Not fun. I've also found that the mileage will change in direct relation to who actually owns the boobs - the girl or the bank. I got a dance once from a girl who would only let me play with one boob, coz it was the only one that she technically owned.

have found no correlation between fake boobs and mileage. not a big fan of fake boobs.

have found that older girls and more plain looking girls are often more willing to go for the extras in my experience. Younger, more beautiful girls seem to think they don't have to give extras to make their money.

The strongest correlations w/ extras are single-motherhood and age. Nearly all extras girls are single mothers. A couple of possibilities why this is: loose morals to begin with which explains why they got pregnant so young; can rationalize what they do as for their children.

T-BoneHead: "The only mileage correlation I've seen is with looks.

Looks go down - mileage goes up.

Not always true, but pretty consistent in what i've seen."

Which explains T-BoneHead's alleged ability to pickup so many strippers. Lower your standards to lifer/loser/married day girls and you are in there! puke

I think the correlation exists but is pretty weak.

Anyway, there is a way to play the best looking strippers to get their mileage up. I wrote about this a long time ago.

The best mileage I've ever gotten ITC is from a small pretty girl with all-natural, Brazilian made 34B's. The second best is from a girl with 38DD's that she bought about five years ago. There is no correlation.

FONDL: I don't like fake tits either. However, I've learned to overlook them on a few girls who had other things going for them. And sometimes I can enjoy them on a cartoonish bimbo-type, as AbbieNormal and I agreed the last time we went over this.

"Looks go down - mileage goes up."

I've found the exact opposite to be the true. I always go with the best looking girl in the place I can get, and I'm not often disappointed. I'm only willing to go so far down the food chain, but I don't find that mileage gets better as i descend.

As I said the last time this came up, if you're choosing up sides for basketball, do you pass up the taller players figuring they won't try to jump as high? Hotter looking women are better because they're made for pleasing, they have more assets to work with and more practice at putting their assets to work.

T-bone, my overall experience, but certainly that is true at the extremes... The best-looking girls I have seen seem to hold back the most, and the ugliest girls seem to go the most to make you forget their faces. However, the correlation seems to become looser toward the middle of the scale.

Mr. T. once said that he always dated ugly girls because pretty girls can only get uglier when they take off their clothes, but ugly girls can only get prettier.

You have the soul of a poet, Mr. Tureaud, the soul of a poet....

The only mileage correlation I've seen is with looks.

Looks go down - mileage goes up.

Not always true, but pretty consistent in what i've seen.

Actually I don't have much interest in fondling fake boobs, if they aren't real what's the point? I don't think I've ever knowingly bought a dance from a girl with fake boobs.

Some girls are like, "Don't touch them, just admire them", while other girls are all, "Go on and feel them all you want. That's what I got them for!"

I remember once a girl telling me that her friend felt more at ease with guys touching her boobs after her boob job, because they weren't really hers anyway.

I bet most strippers with boob jobs would tell you they got them, not for their jobs, but "to feel better about themselves". I haven't noticed a strong mileage correlation one way or the other.

FONDL: But, dude, paying for friendship is not everybody's MO.

I think a lot of the correlations people draw are self-fulfilling prejudices. If you approach strippers with boob jobs openly assuming they're sluts, you might not get far. If you tiptoe around a gorgeous girl, always on guard for signs that she's stuck-up, you'll probably find them. I bet a big reason some get better mileage with lesser beauties is that guys are more at ease with them.

I don't deny that my bias towards beautiful strippers colors the mileage I credit them with. Sucking on a nipple means a lot more to me when her face is jammin' and her body's slammin'. A plain looking girl might get down and nasty on me and I might think yeah, that's nice; a stone fox doing the same filthy deed, and I'm more like, "Oh my god, I don't believe this good girl is doing that!"

I must admit that I've never found anything that correlates with mileage - not looks, not age, not intelligence, not personality type, nor sobriety or lack thereof. Some girls are comfortable with high mileage and some aren't, and I have no idea why or how to tell in advance. Which is why I try to find a girl a like and spend time with her, whatever the mileage level.