discrepancies in the goals of the customer and the seller

When you are chased after for having a commodity your perceived value increases. Due to the increased value you have access to more resources. In a market the commodity can be an effective piece of armor and the resources a form of currency.

Stripclubs create the illusion that sex is a high value commodity and collect a tax from attractive women to let them dance there, as well as a percentage of her earnings.

From the strippers perspective her job is a means to an end;some chicks like to think they're doing it because they like the power they wield, while others do it to gather a means to support that which is most precious to them (be it their family or a hobby). Regardless of the emotional shield she uses to protect herself from feeling like a slut the facts are that resources are exchanged for a false commodity.

Now some men are willing to engage in this unfair trade,and this is their choice. For those who want more, which I assume would be the large majority of strip club purveyors, the venue provides for a fair ground to discuss a fair trade for both parties.

Given that attraction in the real world requires displays of value (which are acquired through wealth) and a real expenditure of wealth (for dates,gifts,etc.) as well as considerable investments of time, it is easy to see why the typical chump would end up Leaving the club several hundred bucks poorer without achieving The goal he left home with.

My question is how can entertainers complain about having to entertain chumps when there is so much profit with such little investment on their part?

Of course this is a rhetorical question, and if you're an "entertainer" feeling bristly

after reading this, consider changing your outlook instead of trying to find faults in my argument.

,respectfully

Happy&dirty