Multiple Aliases
Dougster
Some people seem to think this would be a bad/ evil thing, but the more I think about it, seems like a good way to enhance your anonymity/privacy (e.g. do your reviews of clubs in one state under one handle, reviews from another state under a different handle).
Why exactly do people think use of multiple handles is such a bad/evil thing? Not sure that I get it.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
27 comments
Latest
txtittyfag wasn't me, although he was pretty fuckin' hilarious. Hope he continues to post.
You would have lost at least 60% on the short treasuries and since the s&p double would have list the entire short futures position, except for the 5% margin. Margins calls on both, asshole!
Most posters on TUSCL have accomplished something in their lives. Your only accomplishment is that you are the TUSCL asshole. Your family must be proud of you.
Alucard doesn't need multiple aliases because he is one of those types who get their non-paid social interaction exclusively from the Internet. That is why he enjoys the fighting on here and is caustically and critically judgemental of anyone who's viewpoint or lifestyle he doesn't agree with. Douche bag IRL and on the Net.
I don't think I'd be bragging about a return on my investments that barely beat inflation either. I dunno, thats just me. Maybe if you bought 100oz of gold in 2002 and just offloaded it for a 600% gain you could brag about that ;) But you didn't cuz back then gold was for fools and Dr. No. lol!
And it's easy enough to see how your short treasuries position would have down over the last 3.5 years. Always easy for me to find the point where you made the call since it was the day before the treasuries bottomed. You would have lost at least 60%, and I am being generous in assume your advise was intended to be shorting with 1:1 leverage.
@TortillaChip: tiffyfuck is completely full of shit that one. Best "risk free" investment you can get is by tying yourself into 30y treasuires which have a 2.83% yield this morning.
Even that is hardly "risk free" in the practical sense if you consider the very real possibility that inflation will give you a practically negative yield on those 30 years. It's only theoretically "risk free".
And stating that he found a way to up that "risk free" yield up to 4% is complete BS. He could leverage to get the yield up, but then there are borrowing costs, and I highly doubt he has a source of 30y loans under 2.83%.
Joker420
Juicejoker
Juicebox69
Juicejoker
On here I only use one username.
You know Zilch about my life TortillaChip. It is just incorrect &/or pathetic guesswork. Are you sure you aren't Dougster in disguise.
I have opinions about lifestyles & I'll express my opinions. If you don't like my opinions, DON'T READ them. Or is that TOO hard for you & those like you to comprehend? LOL