Full liqueur or Full Nude??
I am wondering if a club makes more money as a full nude juice bar or half nude but serves full liqueur? In my area and seems like most its either one or the other. Just would like to hear peoples thoughts and opinions on either of these types. One have a better rep then the others? One usually have a harder time with the law?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
19 comments
On the plus side, you get to see some snatch. And the lack of g-strings makes kitty access easier of fingers, penises, pencils and drink straws, if that's your thing.
On the plus side, you get to see some snatch. And the lack of g-strings makes kitty access easier of fingers, penises, pencils and drink straws, if that's your thing.
*will eventually land
*easier for fingers
"Believe it or not, the way to make money is not always through your core talent. Sure, the 300+ dancers that work at one of my clubs bring in money, but we make our real money off of alcohol, cigars, food, and merchandise. Always look at the extra ways you can turn a buck."
Both are upscale clubs, so this may not be true for all clubs, but alcohol in strip clubs is generally a huge profit center with big mark ups. Even soft drinks. I don't drink much, but a Diet Coke at the Flight Club is something like $7,50 for a few cents of water and syrup.
I think motorhead is right. When you sell drink you can make money off the guys who aren't buying LDs and not dropping a lot of stage tips.
BTW, the guy that stated it's easier to put things (fingers, etc) in the pussy with full nude - it only takes a nanosecond for the girls to move the g-string. That g-string doesn't stop anything. It's just an illusion that it's covered and all is well.
My limited experience with full nude/no alcohol bars mirrors this. It was true of Bazooka's in KC in the mid 90's, and is still true of Trixie's and Deja Vu here in Louisville, even though they are no longer nude.