tuscl

Judge orders city to pay $1 to would-be strip-club owner

shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
Tuesday, March 27, 2012 8:01 PM
A federal judge has ordered the city of Seattle to pay $1 to a businessman whose rights were violated when the city delayed issuing him a permit to open a strip club, finding that he could not prove his claims that he had lost more than $1.6 million because of the delay. The award, though nominal, allows Bob Davis and his company, ATL, to ask U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik to award attorneys' fees in the case, which was filed in 2009. The city has said it will oppose paying the fees, said Seattle City Attorney's Office spokeswoman Kimberly Mills. Calls to Davis' attorney were not immediately returned. Lasnik previously had found that the city violated Davis' rights by failing to accept ATL's completed permit application. In his suit, Davis claimed the city obstructed his efforts to convert an Aurora Avenue North restaurant, Cyndy's House of Pancakes, into a strip club. Davis challenged the city's requirement that he obtain a license and comply with a zoning ordinance that required "adult cabarets" to be sited away from schools, community centers, child-care centers and public parks. Lasnik found the city's licensing ordinance failed to provide applicants with a time frame in which the city must issue a license if its requirements are met. As a result, the judge said, the ordinance could allow a city to delay issuing a license indefinitely. In a previous lawsuit, also filed by Davis, Lasnik had ruled that the city's "adult entertainment premises license" requirement was unconstitutional for failing to set a deadline for when the city had to rule on applications. Davis won $500,000 in damages as a result of that lawsuit, which was filed in 2005. Davis won $350,000 from the city of Bothell in 2008 for a similar lawsuit. However, Lasnik said that Davis, in the most recent lawsuit, failed to prove that the city's actions caused ATL any economic loss, particularly since the club never opened. A federal judge has ordered the city of Seattle to pay $1 to a businessman whose rights were violated when the city delayed issuing him a permit to open a strip club, finding that the would-be club owner could not prove his claims that he had lost more than $1.6 million because of the delay. By Mike Carter Seattle Times staff reporter Most Popular Comments Hide / Show comments Does the City have to stuff the dollar bill in Davis' underwear? (March 27, 2012, by Diego De Biker) MORE Read all 1 comments Post a comment . A federal judge has ordered the city of Seattle to pay $1 to a businessman whose rights were violated when the city delayed issuing him a permit to open a strip club, finding that he could not prove his claims that he had lost more than $1.6 million because of the delay. The award, though nominal, allows Bob Davis and his company, ATL, to ask U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik to award attorneys' fees in the case, which was filed in 2009. The city has said it will oppose paying the fees, said Seattle City Attorney's Office spokeswoman Kimberly Mills. Calls to Davis' attorney were not immediately returned. Lasnik previously had found that the city violated Davis' rights by failing to accept ATL's completed permit application. In his suit, Davis claimed the city obstructed his efforts to convert an Aurora Avenue North restaurant, Cyndy's House of Pancakes, into a strip club. Davis challenged the city's requirement that he obtain a license and comply with a zoning ordinance that required "adult cabarets" to be sited away from schools, community centers, child-care centers and public parks. Lasnik found the city's licensing ordinance failed to provide applicants with a time frame in which the city must issue a license if its requirements are met. As a result, the judge said, the ordinance could allow a city to delay issuing a license indefinitely. In a previous lawsuit, also filed by Davis, Lasnik had ruled that the city's "adult entertainment premises license" requirement was unconstitutional for failing to set a deadline for when the city had to rule on applications. Davis won $500,000 in damages as a result of that lawsuit, which was filed in 2005. Davis won $350,000 from the city of Bothell in 2008 for a similar lawsuit. However, Lasnik said that Davis, in the most recent lawsuit, failed to prove that the city's actions caused ATL any economic loss, particularly since the club never opened.

5 comments

  • vincemichaels
    12 years ago
    Thanks, judge. Stick it to em, Mr Davis !!
  • canny
    12 years ago
    Sounds like a great business opportunity. Go around the country trying to open strip clubs and sue the cities for refusing to give you the necessary licenses. You need some start up attorney fees, but after you with the first couple you can clean up! He probably brings in more by suing the cities than he would opening the strip clubs.
  • deogol
    12 years ago
    "A federal judge has ordered the city of Seattle to pay $1 to a businessman whose rights were violated" It's good to know how much our rights are worth in this country.
  • Ghosty
    12 years ago
    Attorneys have rights. The rest of us have to eat what they leave us.
  • Club_Goer_Seattle
    12 years ago
    I'm from Seattle and have read about Davis' adventures over the years. He's tried numerous times to open a strip club in the Puget Sound Region. He finally did, but he had to know in was in an illegal location. The location didn't fit the zoning criteria for being more than 800 ft. away from schools, churches, parks, etc. It was right across the street from a private child care center and school. Even with bad eyesight, Davis should have seen the enormous church one block away behind the school across the street (certainly within 400 ft of his club). It's too bad. I really liked the club. Several customers and dancers I've talked to since the club close also miss it. For comments about the zoning issue, see the reviews for Jiggles, Seattle: [view link]
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion