Dancers that don't do extras reap the benefit of those that do.
shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
A lot of customers are drawn to a club because they know or have been told that extras are available. So they go there seeking the ones that do extras but in the process they spend a lot of money while searching for that special dancer.
28 comments
There are also growing communities on the Internet which help independent girls from any dangers that may come from working outside a club, as well as advertising and scheduling.
There is no positive to prostitution within a club other than that to confuse what the role of a dancer should be.
I don't judge dancers either way; it's each dancer's choice. And I've watched many do quite well without extras, just because they're so cute, have a great personality, and otherwise make me feel like a million bucks.
It would be less dangerous to the provider if the service was legal-- less opportunity for exploitation and abuse by a pimp, more monitored settings for interactions. It would also be less dangerous to the client-- possibly by requiring periodic health screenings for providers, for example. Does it exploit the person (most of whom will be women)? That depends on your definition of exploit. Are they being hired for their body? Yes, but so is the model for his or her beautiful feet or hands or etc. Is the task itself inherently unpleasant and we're "forcing" a person to do something that is unpleasant-- well sometimes, but so is garbage collection and pumping septic tanks-- at least the prostitute could say "no" to certain clients. Would it be any less exploitative to hire a person for minimum wage but boring, no skills required job? Does it sell a commodity or a service (sex) that should be treated differently than all other commodities and services-- well no, look at how many people have perfectly legal marriages that exchange resources (money and all that money buys) for these very same services--- even if the nature of the exchange is a bit less obvious that pay for sex.
Probably preaching to the choir-- enough said.
How can a stripper who won't do extras compete with a different stripper who needs the money so badly that she gives every customer a hand job for an extra $20?
As long as girls can in one night what it takes up to three months to make back home, they will be doing extras.
@BigBill: "the nice girls you think don't mess around will a little for the right guy" = precisely what I seek and have yet to find. :( I guess I'm just not the right guy.
I went to go see a clean dancer I haven't seen in weeks. About a month ago she went from a nearly, if not all, clean club to a pretty dirty one. The old club ironically was physically pretty dirty and charged $20/30 on dances where the new one was nice, clean and charged $30/40 on the dances. I was there for about an hour or so before she got there checking the place out. In that time, I was offered a 'dick massage', to 'play with your dick', and 'take care of you' *nudge* *nudge* *wink* *wink* by at least two dancers, the third was more ambiguous, one flat out asked 'don't you want to come for me?'
While we chatted and caught up, I asked how she liked the new place? She said she has more competition and there's more dirty dancers. I said, 'Yeah! I was offered two hand jobs!' She said, 'Nuh uh?' I said, 'Yeah! Right at the table! But, at least they asked. Remember I had that dancer at _________ just reach in my pants and go to town during a reg lap dance trying to get me in VIP.' But, she said she was also making better money.
I asked if she 'felt any pressure from management to get dirty.' She said, 'no.' 'But it's only been a month,' I said.
Anyhow, as far as what SC was saying, clean dancers can feel a sales bump from the nasty girls!