Current Event Question

NO

no way

NO

It's reprehensible to think that just because a guy has some money and status, he can get some young, impressionable hottie to have se---oh, wait...never mind.

No, it we're talking porn stars, Tori Black would be more my type.

Ignorant Canadian question here. Who are Charlie Sheen and Bree Olson?

No. Sasha Grey would be higher for me.

art,

No question is ignorant. Sheen is somewhat of a "movie star" and the other is a porn star.

Canada has standards, that's why Art doesn't know about those two...

If I had Charlie Sheen's cash, I'd be overseas having my fun. That would be out of reach of the domestic paparazzi, and likely of little interest to the native folks wherever I was (France, etc.)

For the life of me; I cannot see any of guys getting rid of Bree Olson. As far as porn stars go; they are very much the same except that disgusting piece of shit; Belladonna. It was Charlie's fantasy. He's paid for L.A. and NYC escorts. At least he has seen some of Bree's work on DVD or internet. Sure ANNA NIMITY is probably safer in EuroAsia; but do you know what you are going to get ?

Yes, I like her natural innocent look. You have too also consider he didn't just settle for one! Smart man

Only if Octomom was unavailable.

Octomom, PUKE!!! I think Charlie should have been doing Cher. She's more his age.

I like Bree Olson. I meet her at in Raleigh at a Adam & Eve signing and she is very pretty. I can't blame Charlie for liking her. She is my second favorite porn star behind the great Jenna Haze.

If I had Charlie's money, for me, it would be a really cute "B" actress.

No. My first choice wouldn't be a porn star. Playmate, sure. Fitness/bikini model, absolutely. It would be fun to fuck a porn star, but they tend to be screwed up. Why bring that into your life? Bree seems like a normal girl but there's no way she is.

Just added a Charlie Sheen story to the blog section...

Original?: NO

Art's ? - examples of Americans' obsession with porn stars and celebrities. Brea = one of a slew of blonde porn stars.

Sheen = FT seriously deteriorating drug addict and PT actor who is grossly overpaid based on performance [primarily # of days at work]. See also, Lindsay Lohan.

Back to original ?: Limiting to porn princesses I also like Sasha and Tori over Brea. In addition and for variety's sake I'd pick Kayden Kross, Ryan Keely, Heather Vandeven, & Brooke Lee Adams [a woman with some meat on her bones but in all the right places].

That's the fantasy but having all those women in one place at a time would be like living in a SC dressing room. Oy, the never-ending drama!

Seriously, I agree with potheadpl, I'd expand beyond porn to models / playmates for potentially better emotional stability.

Hmmm. If I cared about "emotionally stable," I wouldn't be fucking strippers.

Pornstars are screwed up on a level that makes strippers seem normal. It's weird---I've met a BUNCH of porn stars and they all seemed really nice. But then you Google them and the facade is erased. LOL

I actually looked into buying Bree Olson’s CyberSkin Tit Job Stroker from Adam & Eve, but $160 was too much.

dennyspade,

I don't see where anyone said they would kick Bree out of bed.

I would try to steal a couple of Hugh Hefners blonde girlfriends if that was possible.

^^^^^ If he had any that hadn't fucked themselves up with silicone and collogen, I might agree. As it stands, however...

Fuck no! Give me Jesse Jane and Riley Steele, he has the money, buy them out of their "contracts" and give them new ones ;)

Oh yeah, Jesse Jane would be nice.

No, I'd rather have Kagney Linn Karter or Jessica Lynn.

He can't get a Jesse Jane or Sasha Grey, they wouldn't do it for any money, but Bree Olsen is a nice grab

Physically, uh, maybe. Emotionally, definitely not. Bad choice, Charlie, git yer shit together!

Physically, I personally wouldn't go for a gal who has large "bolt on" fake breasts or is otherwise the traditionally "buxom" type (whether natural or not). I think Bree Olson has fake tits -- what I've found on the 'net suggests this is the case. So, I'd prefer someone of a different body type -- that is, *IF* I'd seen her naked before trying to pick her up, since, as we all know, you can't always tell whether her tits will be nice or nasty until after you've unwrapped 'em! Otherwise, I do find her cute "girl next door" face and preferred "style" to be appealing. I'm not generally seeking the classic California-blonde or classic over-vamped porn-star style, so Ms. Olson isn't my first preference. Nevertheless, given a ready chance, I certainly wouldn't say "no" to her! :)

But on the EMOTIONAL front, I guess generally, that if I were in Charlie Sheen's position, all other things being equal, I would be looking for someone OUTSIDE of show-business, and especially for someone who doesn't work in the FUCKING business. I'd be delighted if, into my life, I could attract young and physically appealing women (such as this Bree person) who also were able to bring into my life a type of MENTAL stimulation which I don't think I'd be getting with Bree. Maybe I would; I don't KNOW whether she's dumb as a post, or a brilliant young businesswoman, or just somebody who is handled by a bunch of motorcycle-gang henchmen. But, assuming the "typical" porn-star lifestyle that probably goes along with the fact that Bree is engaging in the "typical" porn-star employment, I'd have to say that I'd rather not try to date into that kind of drama.

I guess Charlie Sheen does have a bit of a better reason to go after a professional "entertainer" than I would. He, too, is in the entertainment business, and he puts his "whole self" on the line as an actor (and, in fact, as an actor who "plays himself" more than most) daily. It's clearly sent him near to the deep end a few times too many! :) So, perhaps Charlie and Bree have this fact in common, that their emotional and personal identities feel more threatened by their daily work, by their chosen professions, than would be the case for an average North American mainstream professional.

So, if I were in Charlie Sheen's position but I were NOT also an actor, a stressed-out show-biz type, then I don't think I'd have much interest in a Bree Olson type at all. If I actually WERE an actor, AND ALSO were in Charlie Sheen's position, I guess I can see how it might lead me there. But to me it appears to be a sad descent by Charlie Sheen into the WRONG end of show business. We like looking at these women BECAUSE there's no price on their heads. I can see it for free, so can you. That's not someone I want to DATE, since dating is all about HER showing me that SHE values my interaction, and the TWO OF US creating something special that stands ASIDE from the rest of the people in our lives.

So, I think there's nothing exclusive about dating a porn star, especially not a cookie-cutter one that I would have nothing in common with. I do think the fuck would be enjoyable, the first three or four times, sure, because she's physically hot-looking, and maybe she also has some skills in terms of giving off a hot visual performance, or knowing how to twist and twirl her hands, tongue, or ass, in just the right manner to keep my willie stimulated (though, that is just an assumption, and we ain't got no proof of that). But aside from that, what would she TALK ABOUT when you're going to dinner? Uh ... men's dicks? Better lube flavors? How nice her daddy and mommy were to her just before she ran away from home at fourteen?

Heh, I know, I am making the WORST assumptions about porn stars. I might be totally wrong. Hmm ... wouldn't that be frustrating, if they were actually all of them really cool intelligent people interested in medieval Latin or renaissance book-binding ...

Missing here (and I'm guilty of overlooking this too) is that porn fucking is about as similar to real fucking as silicon tits are to natural ones. They look good (much of the time anyway), but once you get 'em in your hands, they aren't so nice. Well, for me anyway. I know some of you like the fake ones.

So just because she looks like she fucks good doesn't mean she actually does.

There is a difference between a good fuck and an easy fuck.

Porn stars and prostitutes only differ in that the former allow their paid sex to be captured by cameras.

Thanks gmd, good point. Good-looking porn sex vs good, satisfying sex. Sometimes there is on-screen chemistry but most of the time it is paint-by-numbers, formula sex broken into a number of takes for easy videography.

how, I disagree. Porn stars earn $$$ by looking good, taking some on-screen direction, and sometimes for acting skills. Their value to the industry increases with their public celebrity status [Bree Olson and the increased sale of her sex toys].

Mid to High level escorts [not street workers] work in relative anonymity outside the "hobby" community and earn money soley for their looks AND ability to pleasure clients. Their earnings depend on offering great sex or the hobbyists move on to another, better provider. Performance is the only criterion and they shun notoriety for their own and clients' protection.

So, in the area of p4p maybe the question is do you want the ego-trip of fucking a "notorius" porn star or a great sex experience with a real pro.

Since I started this topic, I think most seem to agree, they would prefer someone other than Bree.

Now, my answer...

NO!

No, for me too. But if I could choose it might be Jesse Jane or Alexis Texas.

I'm still having a hard time that Charlie Sheen has to pay for pussy! Well... I can see where NOW he will have to pay for it, but I mean before everyone learned that he was a head case. (Damn, talkin' about throwin' away a great life and lifestyle!!)

As for porn stars that I would pay to have sex with...
Keri Sable
Tiffany Taylor
Jesse Jane
Jenna Haze
Krystal Steal
Crystal Ray