Clubs Fines
steve229
Ok, here's a topic that on economics and strippers...A couple dancers have recently vented about the "fines" their clubs charge them - $50 for posting their schedule late, $50 for dancing barefoot, $150 for leaving the club early, etc. I'm a little unclear how the club can collect fines since the dancers are considered independent contractors. Also, I'm assuming this practice is restricted to the upscale, chain clubs?
19 comments
NO. Ghetto clubs like Angels charge hefty fines to the dancers for *everything*. They can only abuse the dancers like this thanks to the vile government. When there was a free market in stripclubs there was real competition for dancers. The government gave the big stick to clubs and the clubs use it against both dancers and customers.
So to be clear: The vile government is to blame for shutting down the little clubs and for all manner of assorted ills---big and small---in the stripclub business. Who are victims? Mainly the dancers and customers and to a much lesser extent the clubs that were allowed to remain open.
At my #2 club, I was told they get a fine if their heels are too small. It's insane because footwear doesn't matter that much, at least to me, but the ones they want them to wear are bad for their feet.
* In return, they would help me earn money by getting guys to buy the overpriced drinks, getting guys to pay the ridiculous "VIP" entry fees, etc....
I think different clubs have different systems. In some areas, the demographics of the clientele, and the behavior of cops and judges in the jurisdiction, "give the clubs the big stick," like Jablake pointed out. In other areas, the girls find out where it's good to work and where it's bad to work, generally on the basis of where they can make maximum profit for their time and effort. Word will get out, and the good girls will gravitate to those clubs. But each city is different. In some cities there's so many strip clubs of so many varieties, that different types of girls with different attitudes gravitate toward different neighborhoods, different clubs. In other cities, there are fewer clubs, fewer dancers and fewer clients, so the opportunity for a girl to move around, or for a club to wield a big stick against her, is at a different level.
What happens in New Orleans is, that there are the tourist clubs, and then there is Visions. At Visions, there are certain required tip-outs, and I think there's probably more of them than the girls want to admit. But generally, the girls who stay in the city long-term tend to gravitate toward dancing there, even though it's a long long way from the tourist districts. The best girls don't ever go to the French Quarter once they've found Visions. The next tier down, might work the FQ during major tourist holidays (Superbowl, Mardi Gras) or might actually get the fuck out of Dodge whenever those events are going on.
So, we have a split clientele. Visions rightly advertises itself as "where the locals go," whereas the FQ clubs work on overpricing themselves, and working elaborate scams with surprise pricing after the fact, because they know the tourists will never be back, and few of them will have any cojones or standing to complain. The right types of girls gravitate to these clubs.
For a while, the FQ clubs had SOME good ones and some bad ones, but the city's population simply can't sustain more than one 'good' club in town. The Deja-Vu line in the FQ used to have some good experiences. And the Scores line, too. But the touristy nature of things has slowly eroded those clubs standing, and the girls report that the tip-outs and requirements are growing and getting cumbersome downtown. Visions, therefore, manages to continue to attract the best girls.
But that's never a guarantee. Visions could start taking advantage of its preeminent status, by overcharging the girls, in which case some of the best (most reliable? hottest-looking?) would start looking for other opportunities.
It's a market for labor, just like any other market. As long as Visions remains intelligent in its management, things will continue to be positive for them. If the economy continues to go downwards, to where men don't buy the stripclub-priced drinks at Visions, and then the Visions management starts demanding more pay from the girls to make up the difference, however ... things might turn bad, fast. Or it might work for them to charge the girls a little more. They'll have to feel it out as the situations develop.
Nope, some of the most abusive fine practices that I've heard of happened at a local club in upstate NY. They would start "fining" girls around the holidays so that the management of the club could have more money to buy presents...real humane of them...not...
The "independent contractors" thing is total BS tax dodge...a lot of clubs have club rules that a dancer can be fined for if they violate them.
While every club has to do their own thing, Mons Venus has one of the best in my mind. The club charges 20 dollars upfront (no bathroom trolls, no tips to the door lady, no anything). That usually also includes a token for a free juice drink. From there, the girls dance, you pay. No BS. If the girls want to do 3 for 50, they will. They come and go as they please, no mandatory times on the stage. But not every place gets the girls, money, and reputation that mons has.
Tootsie's in Miami has girls coming in at all times, but generally they work a shift, depending on the hours of the shift they work determines their payout.
Some clubs don't allow the girls to wear jean skirts as part of their costumes, no heels can be worn while doing a private dance (to not mess up the couches), one foot on the ground, etc.
Clubs have fines, but it's the same reason that governments have "sin" taxes to encourage certain types of behavior.
That may be true, but what I was talking about was fining dancers for every little thing around the holidays (mainly stuff that they would normally let slide...like being literally 1 minute late for a shift) just so that the management could make some extra cash.
"But, if you wanna' work there, you go with the flow. If not, see ya!"
It's funny, that's the same kind of thinking that goes into a "closed shop" that a lot of unions have in place, which isn't fair IMHO either.