Comments by Puddy Tat (page 22)

^ People see, they just don't care. They care about who's going to grow the economy, put food on their table, and not give them PTSD every time they head to the grocery store.

^ 100%. Lots of self-proclaimed centrists who barf back the Democratic party line on cue.

...lots of "but _I_ care!!!" And "they're idiots because they don't agree with me!!!" A year and a half ago, "it's time to move on." https://www.wdsu.com/article/jan-6-national-poll-finds-growing-belief-it-is-time-to-move-on/42465944 https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/americans-are-moving-on-from-jan-6-even-if-congress-hasnt/

^ 54 years of Jan 6's to approach the damage of the Floyd Riots. But Gwen Walz wanted to inhale the smoke from burning tires because it was the smell of history or something, lol.

^ Hell I condemned it. It was disgraceful. It's also stupid low on voters' priority lists.

Weren't they part of a "polycule"? @Hank Moody - Somehow Pete Davidson gets primo puss and he's no model either. I don't think you can get a hot woman if you're ugly and deformed, but charm can make up for a lot.

^ Expected from another partisan Democrat. This has little to do with how either would make Americans' lives better.

"Bro, you posted the thread. Self awareness just doesn't seem to be your thing sometimes." My self-awareness is roughly 1,000x your reading comprehension. Everyone here is a partisan Democrat, hurt over the fact that REAL AMERICANS don't give a flying fuck about it. Please tell your girl Harris to keep campaigning on that. Who knows, it might distract from her far-left VP and the far-left agenda she promoted until 5 minutes ago ;-)

^ Inability to address a goddamn thing.

^ I'd want to see the numbers but I'm intrigued by that.

^ He outs himself with parroting the same liberal lines and pooh-poohing inconvenient facts as guh guh hurr durr mmmmAAAAAggggAAAA!!!1!1

^^ Answered your questions and not going to repeat myself. I didn't say you were calling everyone racist, I said Democrats are. Of course you just outed yourself as a partisan Democrat if you thought that applied to you. A self proclaimed moderate who farts out the left's applause lines on cue.

^^ Ah, the typical Democratic mentality of "we know better than you." Selfie sticks, grandmothers in wheelchairs, and viking helmets don't make an "insurrection." Obviously millions see things differently from you. But please keep flogging it.

@25 - calling something "MAGA propaganda" is not an argument. You asked for Trump's actions, I gave them to you, so stop crying. "Where did I ever state that anyone not entitled to citizenship was entitled to live here?" How about this "Most of you guys are scapegoating the immigrants, but they’re just trying to survive." Plenty of places they can survive that aren't America. They are committing a crime by coming here, full stop. I have no pity, they brought this upon themselves. "Who is removing voter integrity measures?" Democrats, promoting the least secure methods of voting and denouncing any voter integrity measure as racist. Look at the numbers. When I can keep pointing to the scoreboard to make my point, that's a good sign you don't have a point.

^ "Remain in Mexico" was his action. Just saying guh guh buh buh hurr durr MMMMaaaGGGGaaaa!!!1!1!1 is not an argument.

^ Unfortunately I agree with you. Big business has bought out everyone, and the country is run by lawyers who make bank on complexity. Seems like half of government's job is to make it harder for average Americans to do their job. We need to pull a Javier Milei and cut, cut, cut. We'll see how unnecessary most of these people are.

^ They don't? The Biden/Harris administration's removal of safeguards sure fooled me. I don't care if immigrants are "just trying to survive," there is no inherent human right to live in America. They can come the legal way, wait their turn like everyone else, and obey the law. Now we literally have Venezuela emptying prisons and their gangs coming here. Remember in 2019 Harris said she would decriminalize illegal border crossing. Yes, I would favor mandating e-Verify with stiff fines for anyone who employs illegals. Add a guest worker program for whatever labor we need. The only remaining explanation for Democrats importing illegals, removing vote integrity measures, and now talking pathways to citizenship for them is to import votes. There is no other explanation left.

Corporations love open borders for cheap labor. Liberals love open borders because it fulfills the need to tell themselves they're good people without giving up anything whatsoever and a voting bloc (coupled with their removing election security measures and push for amnesty). Americans don't love open borders because it depresses their wages, strains social services, and imports criminals.

^ Hmm, what was I just saying about snide answers. Try to imagine Donald Trump with the same censorship powers as you seem to think are a good thing.

^ I feel like going back to inflation-free growth, peace, and a controlled border. Not "forward" to censorship of any tech that gets too big (you remember what they did to Gab and Parler??), a president and VP who say the constitution doesn't mean exactly what it says, sucking Iran's cock and balls, more Russian invasions like under Biden, even more drunken sailor spending Do you really think she's turned all her 2019 hard left positions magically in an election year? Bernie Sanders doesn't. Of course the lefties here have snark ass answers like "no one's censoring you here" as if an obscure message board is equivalent to a social media platform with 2 billion users. "Joy" my fat ass.

Oh hell no.

^ You're the same person, tard bait.

^ Meanwhile, here's the real Icey, who claims to be such a font of wisdom. Always looking to flex to a bunch of people he claims to hold in contempt. https://tuscl.net/discussion/76367

"By the same logic, you could say, in 1938, Hitler's been Chancellor for 5 years, if he was going to start a war, he would have done it already." Lol. HiTlEr. Or we could say that Harris being VP and not causing a nuclear holocaust doesn't mean she won't next term. Or does that not fit when it's your preferred party? Get real, man.

^ Did that comment make sense in your head? The border isn't the fault of the VP loudly tasked with leading it?