discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
^And? Your point is?
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CJKent (Banned)“The more a person needs to be right, the less certain he is...”
"I think the idea of sex robots is not a good one. Wrong way to solve a non-existent problem. Women have a much higher sexual capacity than men do. So if it were not for patriarchy, we would all already be living in a bonobo camp."
We don't live in a patriarchal society anymore though. So why aren't we having orgies in the street?
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
^I don't think feminism directly tells women to create confidence tests or shit-tests.
However, imagine this exact same scenario. But let's take us back to the 1950s. Let's say you are 21 years old, and she is 19. I don't know if that's how old you guys were but let's just go with it for now.
In the 1950s, the average woman married at the age of 20. A 19 year old girl would've known several friends who were married already. if a woman didn't marry by the time she was 25, she was considered a spinster.
Given the above factors, how do you think that might've changed this girl's behavior in the restaurant?
discussion comment
5 years ago
Yeah they're liberal now. But there's nothing to suggest they are gonna stay that way. Boomers were ridiculously liberal when they were in their 20s. This was the generation that won you that racial equality that you don't seem to appreciate. And support for Republicans is rising among young white men because surprise surprise a lot of us don't like getting demonized for what my great great grandfather did.
What arguments of mine are "Hannity talking points?"
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CJKent (Banned)“The more a person needs to be right, the less certain he is...”
^lot of girls these days ain't doing that stuff anyway 😂
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CJKent (Banned)“The more a person needs to be right, the less certain he is...”
Knowing Nevada, they probably think $500 an hour with a robot is a reasonable price. Best to just buy one for home use.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
^Miss me with that gay shit.
discussion comment
5 years ago
Yeah you keep bringing up those midterms. Both my dad and I voted democrat in those midterms. Both my dad and I are planning to vote for Trump in 2020.
If you are gonna bring age into this. I am just about 100% certain I am younger than you are. I am 21 years old, at a large, public college, studying a liberal arts degree in a field absolutely dominated by liberal ideology and that has only intensified my disagreement with how the left has been acting. If you are relying on the boomers dying off to bring about democrat victory then you may be in for a rude awakening. The baby boomers were extremely liberal when they were young in their 20s. I mean they were the hippie generation for fuck's sake. Millennials and Gen Z are mostly going to be conservatives when they are 60 as well. Especially given the backlash and resentment by many towards how the school system has tried to brainwash us.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CJKent (Banned)“The more a person needs to be right, the less certain he is...”
Oh yeah the US is awash in drugs. The war on drugs is retarded and doing nothing but causing violence in Mexico and Central America.
discussion comment
5 years ago
And when VH_Kicks calls someone a "deplorable commie beta cuck" --- oops.
By the way, you seem to really be counting on those 2018 midterm results. You know I voted for the Democrats in 2018? It seems you have not considered that extreme behavior on the left might have caused people to switch sides.
@FLF
I have good reasons for opposing the SJW lynch mob. I've already told people that you don't count as an SJW unless you are attempting to use accusations of all the various "isms" to win an argument and doxxing people. SJWs want to destroy your life if you disagree with them.
If someone's goals align with mine. What do you think I'll tell them? Don't agree with me? That would be foolish. Following the herd is when you blindly support whatever the people around you believe.
discussion comment
5 years ago
If anything, SJWs represent a regression in human evolution.
https://medium.com/@even.aesphasian/on-why-the-social-justice-warrior-ideology-is-fundamentally-medieval-fd6a09a2dcc8
SJWs are probably the least courageous people I've ever seen. There's nothing courageous about agreeing with everyone around you, virtue signalling on Twitter, and demanding that the college administration prevent you from ever having to hear opposing viewpoints.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
That's the problem with the gun control crowd is that they just think banning guns will solve everything.
@VH_Kicks
If Japan was to completely reverse their gun policy, I wouldn't be surprised if crime went up a little bit, but I'm willing to bet it would still remain at extremely low levels well below the US and Europe. Japan doesn't have the gang problem we have, they don't have ethnic tensions, they don't have political divisions, and family values in Japan are very strong so it cuts down on domestic violence. All of these factors are what has eliminated the rage problem that does exist pretty much everywhere else in the world. The criminal culture in Japan largely just doesn't exist. Even the Yakuza gangs only have 40,000 members across all of them and their membership is constantly declining because pretty much nobody has any interest in being a part of that lifestyle.
Japan, the UK, and Australia have all had relatively low rates of crime compared to the US for decades. The UK's crime rate has actually risen if you look further back in history. Back in the 1950s and 1960s, the UK's homicide rate hovered between 0.60 to 0.75 per 100,000. The police infamously didn't even carry guns back then. During the 1980s, it was just starting to consistently breach 1.00 per 100,000. In 2002, it peaked at 2.1 per 100,000. Since then it has gone down to about 1.2 per 100,000.
Australia in 1989 and 1990 had a homicide rate of 1.8 per 100,000. A little higher than it is today but it still had a very low crime rate compared to the US. In order to go back to a time when the UK and Australia did have significant problems with criminal violence, you probably would have to go all the way back to the 19th century.
If the US outlawed guns, we'd be much more likely to face an increase in homicide rates than to become like a Western European country. The gangs would illegally keep all their weapons and all the lawful citizens would give their guns up. So as far as criminals go you'd accomplish nothing. If your country is already having a problem with criminal violence, then disarming the citizenry is a really bad idea. Disarming the citizenry is only a good idea when the reasons for criminal behavior happening in the first place have been addressed.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
^Its not entirely due to restrictive gun laws. Restrictive gun laws probably reduce it once all the other factors have been contained but restrictive gun laws alone will not do that. Mexico has very restrictive gun laws and that didn't do anything. Honduras attempted to control crime by cracking down on firearm ownership in 2007 and it did absolutely nothing. Crime has actually increased in the Honduras since 2007.
Restricting guns works once you have gotten everything else under control. It didn't work in Mexico and Central America because they already had a crisis of criminal violence going on. It has reduced crime in Japan because they never had a crisis of crime to begin with. The country has had very low rates of violent crime for decades. Gun control measures are unlikely to work in the United States because we already have so many guns floating around and we have a small crisis of criminal violence (although nowhere near as bad as Mexico's obviously).
Japan's success in having extremely low crime rates is really more of a cultural success. They have created a culture where crime is not seen as an option, and where excuses for crime are mitigated. I also will say that America has a rage problem that Japan doesn't have. There are a lot of Americans on both sides of the political spectrum who are extremely angry at certain groups of people. This phenomenon largely does not seem to exist in Japan. I'd say that curing the rage problem will go much further in reducing crime than restricting guns would.
discussion comment
5 years ago
^Lmao as if progressives will ever let that happen! They will keep harping on racism and xenophobia until people get so frustrated with them they literally resurrect it from the grave despite it having been driven almost entirely to extinction.
You think its a coincidence that racial tensions got worse under Obama? Its because of the fucking SJWs trying to make everything about race. Conservatives have been trying to say that race is unimportant for decades now. It was progressives who insisted on making it a national problem again.
discussion comment
5 years ago
What movies have you been watching lately? I don't even remember the last time I saw a movie featuring a muslim as a villain and I watch a lot of movies at the theaters. It's all been aliens in comic book movies or criminal organizations in fast and furious movies.
I think progressives ironically live in the past. They talk as if issues that were resolved 10 years ago, 50 years ago, or apparently even 100 years ago are still relevant today.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
@meat72
Indeed that is when I turned 13.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
Indeed it is @Heaving
People really over-complicate the meaning of life don't they?
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
founderslip a dollar in her g-string for me
^Kind of like shitty coffee 😈
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
@SJG
Now that's not a proper cougar. A cougar will be hot and show you a few tricks 😉
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CC99Say yes to the sex industry!
Lol @heaving
discussion comment
5 years ago
@pistola
Did you know that in America, we don't celebrate Algerian Independence Day?
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
IceyI put your ATF on a winning team
1950s America was great.
But no one is as great as 21st century Japan. 2,400 felonies committed in a country of 125 million people. There are more people murdered in Baltimore alone than in the entire country of Japan. On top of having the lowest rate of crime in the world, it has the highest life expectancy, a minuscule rate of obesity despite being a rich country, a legal, booming prostitution industry with very hot girls despite low prices, and of course, possibly the cutest and most feminine girls in the world.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CJKent (Banned)“The more a person needs to be right, the less certain he is...”
@CJKent
This is what the Native America population looked like over time.
https://therooseveltreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/suresh2-1-475x345.png
Almost every example one would be able to give of abuse happened in the 19th century when smallpox had already 90% of the Native American population. Yes there were several massacres and our government was a real dick during the 1800s. But Thanksgiving goes back to Pilgrim days where any abuses would've been on a very small scale. Most people though try to act like the Europeans somehow intentionally controlled smallpox and made it kill everyone. Smallpox killed 60 million Europeans during the 18th century too though. It was a nasty disease that was a major threat to daily life. It just happened to hit the native americans harder than it hit the Europeans.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
CJKent (Banned)“The more a person needs to be right, the less certain he is...”
@ime
That's what gets me every time people talk about "genocide!" The reduction in native American numbers was almost entirely due to disease. People want to blame the Europeans because they were European diseases that the Native Americans didn't have immunity to but that's just absurd. Genocide has to be an intentional attempt to wipe out an ethnic group. Disease is not spread intentionally. It is controlled by nature. People are blaming the Europeans for what nature did.
discussion comment
5 years ago
![]()
founderslip a dollar in her g-string for me
I think this thread needs to be pinned because the title and post sync up great.