Comments by LapHunt (page 3)

At this point, I don't think we're going to see beanings for this behavior anymore because the newer generation behaves this way en masse. Players like Brian McCann who were bothered by it are no longer in the game. Change the demographics, change the culture. What's happening in baseball is just a microcosm for what's happening to the country.

I remember a few years back I was reading an article about this online and a Vegas pro made the remark "Welcome to Vegas...where the college girls dress like hookers and the hookers dress like college girls." I laughed off the comment at the time as mostly a joke, but on my next trip I was amused by how accurate that comment proved to be. I noticed these red-hot 20-yr old blondes wearing ultra-short skirts with hair and make-up all done to the nines, but you could tell they were in a bachelorette party or just clubbing with their friends. Then I'd sit down at the bar slots and a 6 or 7 type girl wearing average clothing (e.g. long-sleeved top and jeans) would make her intentions known. It does seem it's possible to bump into a "unicorn" (almost surely this would be at a higher-end casino) but these days, that encounter would probably run you four figures or very close to it.

^^"Trump has said nice things about Vivek." Trump has said nice things about Ramaswamy because he doesn't view him as a threat. If Ramaswamy was to ever approach 20% in a primary poll, Trump's attitude toward him would change dramatically, and the gloves would come off. This is why Trump only attacks DeSantis. Trump knows DeSantis is his only credible threat (to date). I, for one, don't see Ramaswamy ever hitting 15% in any national primary poll as long as there are multiple candidates (you have to allow for one or two outliers with bad methodology) but stranger things have happened. If everyone else dropped out and it was just the two of them, then I suppose he could hit 20-25%, but that level of support wouldn't be a plausible threat to Trump in a head-to-head matchup.

I think, in general, the younger white chicks these days frown on stripping way more so than past generations. For native-borns, it really does seem a lot of the hot ones are making a living off social media. When OnlyFans first came out, I'll admit I really didn't see how it could provide a livable income for a girl unless we're talking about a major celebrity or something. But I guess if they get enough followers, companies pay them to do product placement, etc. and they also get subscriptions from guys for photos and stuff. It must be working on some level as at least a partial explanation for all this.

"I stress everyone's unique lived experience gives them a lens in which to interpret the effects the facts have on how they are living..." Leftist language. One's "unique lived experience" as a lens in which to interpret facts is deconstructionist and simply a way to encourage subversion. Facts are facts. This is just coded language that has been used by leftist agitators for decades. It really means "letting BLM and other Marxist groups deconstruct American history however they want so they can get away with whatever they want."

Just DEI. The schools are indoctrination camps at this point.

@gammanu95: 1) Yes, there is nothing at all wrong about going with your middle name. I mentioned this only to note that she chose the middle name instead of the first name. The middle name is, in my view, the better choice for someone assimilating into American culture. This is just my opinion. I'd rather have a President Nikki Haley than a President Nimrata Randhawa if we're talking about the United States. A potential reply to this would be "why does it matter?" or "what's in a name?" I suppose that will simply depend on one's view of American culture and to what extent one wants it to remain, for lack of a better word, Anglicized, or linked to founding stock principles. At the end of the day, she would be an American-born woman with Indian parents as President. One is either fine with this or isn't. 2) As for the Founders' vision, you are correct of course that they wanted a secular government guided by principles of free will and personal responsibility. But they simply never could have conceived of their country one day being majority populated by peoples of non-white, non-European origin (which will occur by around 2045 or so at current trends). Thus, it is difficult to interpret where they would have stood on the question of a "President Ramaswamy." But hey, America twice elected Barack Hussein Obama, so I suppose this question (practically speaking) has already been answered. I would concur with the assessment that the three worst presidents in American history are Biden (worst), followed by Carter, and then Obama. Obama did the most intentional cultural damage though, whereas Carter's failures seemed to be mostly the result of weakness and ineptitude. Obama's two Supreme Court appointees (Sotomayor, Kagan) are wholly unqualified diversity hires, and this trend set the country on a really bad path of identity politics.

mark94: I don't dispute any of your comments about Vivek Ramaswamy's intelligence or accomplishments. You seem to almost favor him (perhaps only behind Trump) as the choice to be the GOP's 2024 nominee. Here's my question to you. Do you truly feel that a self-identifying Hindu with the last name "Ramaswamy" (I mean, why not anglicize it to "Ramsay"?; Nikki Haley's real name btw is Nimrata Randhawa; Nikki is the anglicized first name and Haley is of course her married name) is an appropriate and fitting choice to serve as President of the United States? Is there no semblance of Christian identity left in the United States? Does the Founders' vision count for anything? I'm all for content of character, assimilation, MLK, all that stuff. But is there not a reasonable limit to this diversity stuff? With the absolutely staggering demographic change happening to the country, isn't a "President Ramaswamy" pretty much a globalist dream come true from an identity standpoint (even if he says non-woke stuff)? Okay, he's smart and articulate. But shouldn't there be more to it than that?

Wonder how OP made out. Come on, OP, you got two threads of solid advice from TUSCLers on this who took time to share tips. Let us know how it turned out.

^Yeah, I think things just got to the point where they couldn't keep up with all the working girls. Plus, the girls' methods got more discreet (many of them now tend to dress very casual but convey their intent through subtle eye contact, conversation, etc.) Plus, as others have suggested, it seems like casino security in some cases may even be in on it via kickbacks.

Don't see Ramaswamy being particularly relevant. I think his flirting with 3rd in the polls is more a reflection of how horrendous Haley and Pence are proving to be as candidates. Now that Tim Scott has been in the running a while, he is emerging as the third strongest candidate behind DeSantis and Trump. Frankly, Ramaswamy has a lot of nerve running to be President. He's 37 and maybe 5 foot 6. He's not Christian. I don't think he has any business running to be President of the United States. He's a capitalist money man. He talks well, but he's a BSer and you can see it. The kind of slick corporate guy your company hires to motivate your team to get more sales before the end of Q3. He is miscast as a legitimate candidate for President of the United States. And the notion that, with Trump gone, Vivek would beat DeSantis is a rather hard sell. DeSantis is the clear winner if Trump was somehow knocked out.

Yeah, now that Tucker is gone, we will never ever hear anything resembling a discussion about demographic replacement on Fox News again. I honestly think this is the main reason he may have been fired. Their entire revamped primetime lineup (Watters, Hannity, Gutfeld) is basically like a three-hour neocon extravaganza. It might as well be sponsored by Lindsay Graham. They are basically controlled opposition. All of those guys couldn't care less about mass immigration or the cultural rot of America. Interesting that they demoted Laura Ingraham (who at least calls out McConnell and has a scintilla of being based) to 7pm. Even she is too much for them now, which says a lot.

Encountering a truly hot one can be elusive. It seems the ones that tend to be the most forward in the casinos are just okay looking or plain. That isn't always the case mind you, but it can be that way sometimes. But once they chat you up at the bar, they often make their intentions known pretty quick.

The demographic landslide is accelerating too. I think the laid-back attitude many have is because they live in leafy suburbs or midwestern places that are still nice. They haven't yet seen or experienced what places like NY, NJ, Chicago, SF, LA, Toronto, etc. have become in the last 5-7 years (yes, the change is that recent and that staggering) so one can afford to think that diversity as it's idyllically portrayed on TV sitcoms and Netflix shows is reflective of real diversity. But at this rate of landslide change happening under Biden, sadly their leafy idyllic suburbs won't stay that way for long, and they'll soon come to know what others have about the wonders of inviting 25-50% of the Third World into your borders and expecting to have the same country. To this point, England and France are done. Just totally done. To the OP, I know you just wanted to find out where you can get a hot blonde to grind your Johnson. I hear ya, brother, I really do. And I know you may be thinking, hey the thread got kinda sidetracked, but bro, this is the reason why these hot all-American babes are getting fewer and fewer. Gotta keep it 100.

Okay, so as OP asked, which clubs in Portland can you get really good grind LDs from hot chicks? I'd heard some things about Kit Kat Club, but reviews seem to indicate a mixed experience. There seem to be so many that it's hard to pinpoint the best one or two places. Like in Tampa pre-pandemic, Mons, 2001, and Scarlett's were the top of the heap so it was easy to hone in on them if visiting there.

I think one of the catches is that a lot of the best clubs in the country where high-contact LDs were the norm (Mons, etc.) have fallen off in recent years. I don't doubt that clubs in Iowa and the midwest have lots of white girls, but unsure how good the LD contact will be and imagine it will vary a lot. For instance, there is another discussion thread someone posted inquiring about Portland clubs. I'm pretty sure there will be TONS of white girls in Portland SCs (granted, they will be skinny, liberal, inked-up, vegan types) but as far as I know Portland is an airdance town (for the most part at least). Mons *would* have been great to address this concern as that place is full of hot college-aged white girls who give high-mileage dances. Thing is, those dances are now like $68 each ($50 per + $18 to the house or something) post-pandemic.

^docsavage, good to know there are others who'll tell it like it is, and say what needs saying. Just imagine how inconceivable it would have been in, say, 1985, to wonder why you couldn't find white girls in an American nudie club.

They have certainly dwindled in the Vegas clubs in my experience, and it gets more noticeable each year. It sounds like clubs in many parts of Florida are seeing the same trend.

Do any Portland clubs actually have good grind lapdances though? I'd looked into the area a while ago and, based on reviews, it seemed like most of the Portland clubs were known for uppity, inked-up, vegan stripper girls who mostly give airdances for $40 or $50 each. Portland clubs seem to coast off their "grittiness" and "ambience" more than anything. I didn't get the sense that Florida-style grinding LDs were much of a thing in Portland.

Shouldn't Cuba (their home country) which has failed them through communism and a life of poverty where these smugglers are allowed to thrive shoulder a good deal of the blame? In the USA, I see them rocking designer clothes and Gucci handbags, yet it is America to be blamed? Further, not all of them work in SCs or as sex workers. Many of them do pay off their debts as hotel workers, maids, or other jobs.

Disregard merit...be prepared for the societal implications. KJP's biggest liability isn't actually her intelligence (which is about average if one is being generous). It's her terrible temperament.

Hey JamesSD, instead of downvoting an opinion that challenges your assertion...engage...civilly. Do leftists still have that capability? I could have downvoted your comment in turn, but didn't. Please, why is Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has maintained civility and self-composure throughout his tragic life, "nuts" for simply offering an alternative perspective on the MSM-enforced opinion on vaccines?

RFK Jr. is most certainly not "nuts." He's an articulate, intelligent person who is the only one in that family carrying on the legacy of JFK and RFK. The reason he is being vilified by the media is because there is no longer any place for patriotic classical liberals in the Democratic Party, which has been completely overtaken by radicals, race-hustlers, and Marxists.

^JamesSD, yes the second generation native-borns of those immigrants that came to America/Canada in the 20th century by and large assimilated well. But if you look at the post-2015 landscape (2015 is relevant because that's the year the mass migration crisis started in Europe which has now made its way here) this assimilation is no longer happening. A walk through the downtown of any large North American city now for anyone over say, 35 years of age (who can remember a time before globalism/mass migration), and let's face it, this is no longer the West if we're being honest about demographics.

I like RFK Jr. but don't think he has any chance at becoming the Dem nominee. That party is way too corrupt now and even if he did get a surge of support, they'd cheat or change the rules to keep him off the ticket. Biden will be the Dem nominee. Newsom is probably being groomed for 2028. I can't see Trump losing the GOP primary. His support in the party is too strong and almost cultlike. This is unfortunate for the GOP because DeSantis is clearly more electable in a general election. I can't see Trump winning another general. Biden will defeat Trump in 2024 I think, even if it takes "all night" to count the votes in PA, GA, etc.