Ratings have been modified...
founder
slip a dollar in her g-string for me
Based on the input from the users here, I have modified the ratings algorithm. I am not going to tell you what I did, but I would like you to take a look at your favorite clubs, and let me know if you see anyting that doesn't make sense.
Keep in mind, the rating is not simply the club's review ratings diveded by the number of reviews. There are other factors in determining a club's rating.
Also, all reviews for a club are now availble (not just 2 years). We show 10 on the first page, then a second click will bring up all the rest for that club.
Happy reading
Keep in mind, the rating is not simply the club's review ratings diveded by the number of reviews. There are other factors in determining a club's rating.
Also, all reviews for a club are now availble (not just 2 years). We show 10 on the first page, then a second click will bring up all the rest for that club.
Happy reading
11 comments
Also, current practice of grading 3 factors allows 1 to evaluate strong points- suggest allowing an overall grade to overide individual factors. There are dinky clubs that might get a 5 grade in club facilities factor, yet have hot babes & high mileage. Then there are clubs with impeccable facilities & 9 grade barbie dolls, yet are too sterile to truly have a good time. Thus, some tweaking of factor grades to get the grade that 1 really thinks club deserves.
How about putting an anchor tag on the 10th review on the 2nd page and linking to it from the first page. I've already looked at the first 10, get me to #11 please!
And I agree with arbeeguy, the ranks are nice but the real value are the reviews.