Time to Change Reviews Format

I'd suggest finding a recent review that is similar to one you'd right. Then just add a comment to that review, noting anything that was different about your visit. Only right a new review when this isn't possible.

i still need to tell how the fucking parking lot is and what condition to get a review approved.. hey the fucking parking lot is not where you are getting a bj - so fuck off

@rawhide2 I’ve gotten bj’s in clubs outside of 3 different clubs in 2 different states, but granted that was 20+ years ago.

Yeah I had a dancer try and convince me to go play in the parking lot just the other day.

The extra stuff that people are requiring was done for "proof of life" that the reviewer had been to the club, but the reality is plenty of reviews can get through if there's a mention of something that sounds genuine and the review itself is somewhat decent. Some crap does manage to get through, but they seem ok. If I were still writing reviews I probably would spend more than a couple of lines about the basic club setup.

*probably wouldn't spend more than a couple of lines about the basic club setup

Have you read the reviews lately? You don't even have to mention layout, girls, or prices, and it will still get approved.

Yeah, I feel the most important part of the review is the “fun” you had with your stripper. No need to use names, but use abbreviations for the fun you had (FS, HJ, BJ).

@sfrsox even 20 years ago - pre cameras - that is an impressive feat. those girls must have really needed the cash or just really wanted to suck your cock.

The reviews... maybe the review should have to validate or confirm all the specifics on the club before the review (you know like confirming VIP price options, dance price options, cover charge and floor dance options..... just a thought

Been a while since I've been on this forum. I'll provide a suggestion, maybe somebody can pass it along to Founder.

OP is right: it's 2026, but more importantly, AI is actually, sometimes, useful! Controversial as hell, yes. But, for something as simple as summarizing reviews, I think AI is actually pretty damn helpful. When I am looking at a product on Amazon that has 100s of reviews, I usually don't want to read through all of them, or search through them. I'm GLAD that Amazon implemented AI summaries. They're good! They provide a concise summary of all the reviews, and break it down by specific aspects of the product (e.g. durability, functionality, quality, assembly, etc.). Plus, if I do have a very specific question or concern about a product, I can just ask the AI, and it will say "yes, these reviewers confirmed [detail true]" or "no, these reviewers confirmed [detail false]."

I suppose it would be a challenge for Founder to figure out how to do this, but I think a similar thing could be implemented on TUSCL for clubs that have 50+ reviews. Yes, we want to be informed of changes that occur at our favorite clubs, but we also don't want to read/write the same exact details, as OP noted, over and over again. An AI could easily read all the reviews, come up with a summary of the pertinent club details (layout, quality, ambiance, etc.) and then new reviews could skip those details by simply acknowledging that, yes, the AI's summary is still accurate. All the personal experiences, and other variables (prices, dancers, events, staff, etc.), could then be described in the actual written summary. Plus, Founder probably wouldn't even have to rely on some third-party cloud computing service. It would surely be more challenging to implement an AI feature locally, on the TUSCL server, but the open-source open-weights models are almost as good as the frontier models; they would probably be quite competent at the simple task of summarizing reviews.

With clubs that don't have recent reviews, I can see letting a bad review slip through. Better limited info than none.

"Been a while since I've been on this forum."

Yeah, because you admitted "living your best life" involves bragging about your Bitcoin stash, and you haven't had much to brag about in a while. #incel

My suggestion is to ID a handful of regulars to a club and have them update the general information on the club in the top portion. Right now some clubs have a few details there, others look like they were pulled from the clubs website

Rather than use AI, which is just going to hallucinate things and may be more confusing than helpful, we just need a static, community-edited club description. There's no need for the cost and complexity and risk of letting an LLM produce it.

This could simply be a paragraph or two that covers the basics. The text could be put in a pre-filled box with the previously saved content presented to a reviewer. If the description is good (and still valid), they could just skip it. If prices have changed or the parking lot has been resurfaced or whatever, they can edit the club description.

Then a separate text box would be for the review itself. That would be focused on the specific encounter, the women dancing, the experience, etc..

This sort of thing has been suggested before. It would save time for reviewers and eliminate redundant text for readers. It would, of course, require a new feature be implemented by Founder. Not knowing the underlying architecture I can't say for sure, but it wouldn't have to be a complex addition.

tuscl.net -> wikipervia.org

The easy solution is what many have already done. They start out by saying "the club layout has already been described many times, so I am going to skip it". And then the adjudicators approve the review. Problem solved.

Other than that, a few guys are entertaining writers and I enjoy it when the elaborate beyond the basic review. I don't care much if it "should" be posted in the discussion section. But then, I am an easy reader, and I know how to skim across parts I don't care about.

I don't think the founder wants to implement the changes others suggest. And that doesn't bother me much.

This topic just won't die. Always seems to be started by some lazy asshat who wants a DB post/tweet to pass for a REVIEW. They're butthurt that they didn't get a 4-0, 7-0, whatever upvote. Reread founders' guideline which states to gear review towards someone who's never been to club. Founder had an excellent thread with sample rejected review. He further elaborated on many unanswered questions, and suggested approaches to answering those. In short, put up (pay for VIP membership or write reviews that closely comply with founders' guidelines) or shut up.

I like it when someone throws in some piece of information unique to that particular visit. For example, this is Indy 500 race weekend here in Indianapolis. I will probably check the reviews, if any, involving race fans here in town, what the crowds were like and what they thought of the local strip clubs and city.

I don't think it's really all that difficult to get a review approved these days as long as some degree of effort is put into writing it, and there's at least some value to someone who chooses to read it. Not everyone is going to want to provide intimate details about their private dances. Not everyone is going to want to describe the club. Not everyone is going to have an overly positive or overly negative experience to share about their club visit. Personally, I just want a review to be legit, and offer something of value to me as the reader.

It would be nice if everyone would double-check their reviews for basic spelling and readability before hitting the submit button...lol

your review should be regarding your last visit and if anything significant has changed. girls, fees, clientele, music, management, rules, etc. if some things are consistent, add a line about that. if you had a great experience with a dancer, sure. if you had a ROB, let us all know. whether to order food...drinks ok?

I just read the SYN review that had no specifics that sounded like it was from an ad with AI assistance. that's not cool!

The most important components of reviews are what did the girls look like and how much do dances and rooms cost. Describing girls as "mostly 5-8" isn't at all helpful as tastes differ a lot. Were the girls spinners, hwp or obese? Natural boobs or fake? Hairstyles? Duck lips or slender features? Approximate age range?

The third most important thing is warning if a club is ID scanning or doing anything else that endangers their patrons privacy and livelihoods.