Girls omitting/lying about contact levels in clubs in reviews

I appreciate reviews that describe contact level (aka "mileage"). On rare occasion (when selecting between two or more similar clubs in a geographic area), It does have an impact on which club I visit.

I too have noticed that dancers seldom describe contact level in the reviews that they submit. Like blahblahblah, I don't see the rationale for that omission by dancers, unless there is some concern that describing a low contact level would dissuade some customers from visiting a particular club.

I was talking more about dancer reviews online where supposedly dancers or ex dancers post club reviews for other girls. For a dancer imo typical contact levels and how much sexual assault is considered normal at a club is one of ybe most important pieces of info for deciding where to dance at. I would say that, cuts or fees, scheduling (preferably none at all), and what type of clientele go there are the most important pieces of info.

Like I don't give a fuck that some girl can make $5k at babydolls Dallas in a normal week but you must allow men to touch you literally everywhere to pull that. Not that money motivated especially considering that regular career jobs pay more now than they ever used to before.

Yeah the mileage part is always bullshit but one thing I notice in some dancer reviews on here at least is they are pretty good with price details so I usually upvote when I see those.

I think two way touch is so common that it maybe doesn’t even register for a lot of dancers?

And a lot of municipalities have laws a lot stricter than what’s common, and club managers don’t even mention them unless they are worried about a raid.And even if you’re anonymous, it may be iffy to encourage a raid in your own workplace.

Here’s the laws in Phoenix. Um, I absolutely never ever ever put my boobs in a customer’s face when I’ve danced at clubs there.

From what I've seen and heard from dancers, there are two major reasons.

1. They want to at least pay lip service to the laws and club rules. Besides, whatever level of contact might be "required" to make bank, there's always the chance, however small, that some schlub will come in and be happy with a $1,000 air dance.

2. Irrespective of how "anonymous" this, or any other site, is (i.e. not at all), they don't want to chance being recognized and associated with non-approved activity.

They omit contact levels because they don't want the world to know they work in a whorehouse and to make bank you have to be a whore.

@blahblahblah: I don't read the reviews on stripper web or on other web sites that are focused on communication between dancer.
As you know, TUSCL is focused on the customer experience. Thus mileage is of interest in most, if not all of the reviews.
If I was a dancer, I'd be tempted to discourage competition so that I'd make more money. That might mean underestimating potential income or exaggerating how hard (and permissive) you need to be to make money.

I do see this at many clubs. A novice dancer will have been given instructions by the other dancers to give crappy dances (e.g., air dances) and to charge a lot of $. Then the new dancer will be wondering why she gets few repeat customers. Some of them will accept a bit of "coaching" from customers as to how to get more dances and to get return customers.

Sigh the two biggest things people lie about are sex and money. Not surprising it's hard to get the truth about a sex-based business establishment.

I think omitting is fair, most of the reviews on here written by PLs leave out mileage and other basic details and we know those guys aren't "lying". I think any dancer on Tuscl especially isn't going to say something that will make the spenders on here NOT go to there club. More dancers on Tuscl should be a 2025 goal LOLOLOL.

Yeah, I've already said I see why a girl wouldn't wanna scare of customers on a customer site. I just meant when dancers communicate between other dancers, a bit of honesty might be nice instead of the shit they do to each other in reality.

I do realize the laws are stricter than reality in most places, but also customers describe mileage enough to where I don't see how strippers being honest is gonna get their clubs raided lmfao!

It is easy af to stay anonymous online. If a girl doesn't wanna chance shit make a burner account for 1 post/comment then lose the login info.

Also I realize strippers lie about shit all the time to kill competition. That's why I don't believe a single word they say till I verify lol.

I honestly think girls are just used to lying about "dancing clean".

Clubs go through phases so it wouldn’t matter. My reviews here are old. A lot can change about what’s allowed, even just based on the girls currently working there. So it doesn’t really matter.
AND, I’ve never been anywhere where what other girls are doing changes what I’m doing in my dances aside from “we do/don’t get full nude here.”

One of my favs worked at a club where most of the dancers made there money at a hotel next door. (I never went, she and I were 100% OTC at that point.) She said she did fine just with 2-way no extras. Most of the other dancers looked bedraggled from shooting heroin. She was slender with subtle but killer curves, piercing blue eyes, and a scary-fun blah-type personality.

Well I will hand it to TUSCL. Anonymous mongers are much more willing to call BS on this site than strippers are to each other on other spaces.
https://tuscl.net/discussion/8…

I do think PSD has a good point tho. I’ve noticed mileage can be in an odd flux sometimes.

Lots of dancers have told me about the games that go on with "club rules". Management knows it will do better financially if things go on that are illegal or in a legal grey area. But, if need be, they want to be able to scapegoat the dancers in response to any government crackdown. They scold the dancers, but the follow through is spotty at best. If a dancer doesn't accommodate the manager or friends of the manager, the not-rules rules become actual rules, selectively for her. So, I can see why dancers are wary of talking about "breaking" the fake rules. It could draw LE attention. We don't use real names, but the more people know us irl, the more they could figure out who we are, if they looked at everything we post.

Nice to see Blah, the Spicester and PSD post again.

As to strippers not giving honest info of stripper sites….I ducked hunted a lot in my life. DU has a site where hunters give updates about their current relative experiences at various locations. I have a buddy that believes what he reads there. He hasn’t shot a duck in a decade. I assume everything posted there is bullshit and an attempt to keep other hunters away from good spots and steer them to bad spots. In other words, people lying to their competition is probably the norm

I'm feeling like I just got called a duck.

Yeah there totally is a game where management needs to pretend they enforce the law without really caring. Girls are more likely to get sent home for being drunk than giving extras, and it's pretty notorious the old "girl gets in trouble for being too obvious on Friday, she is back at the club by Tuesday"

@ilbbaicnl: I don’t much about hunting, but I hope this is rabbit season.

https://youtu.be/17ocaZb-bGg

☀️ 🚦 $Strippers Have Fav's, & Rules Vary By Club, So They Kinda Keep In Under Da' Table Of What Could "Potentially Be Performed".
$Strippers Have Watch Who They Select For Higher Mileage/Extras, Coz Of Da' Regulars, Cameras, Managers, Pimps, Cops, Etc.....
If You Perform OTC, You Avoid Any Conflicts.

Fun Cops Song For Da' Strip Clubs!
No Fear, & Protect Yourself 🤑

https://youtube.com/watch?v=2Q…