Could tuscl use a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer?
Muddy
USA
I was recently at a strip club getting head from a stripper that looked like Jessica Alba, I was completely soft and wasn't paying attention at all. She looked up asked "Ugh...are you ok?" I brushed her aside and told her to take hike. Because all I could think about was.........why doesn't this establishment have more women of color in positions of authority in it? How could this happen? How could this be? I felt intent in making change.
I was recently jerking off to photos online of Page Spiranac. Then I thought to myself, this, this is all wrong. I google imaged Lizzo and finished masturbating. I knew on that day the world was now a better place.
What I'm trying to get at it here, is that we need change on tuscl. Appointing somebody to hold the line on inclusion would do great wonders. All you would really need is, and this really goes for everywhere not just here...
1. Basically just hassle the shit out of the white people every waking moment and
2. Just be an overall huge fucking douchebag.
And that's pretty much it. Any takers?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
24 comments
Latest
No. Internet forums don't need diversity officers. Even small companies don't. Really only giant corporations like Facebook need them. And even then they basically exist to sign a paper saying "we are diverse, we increased the percentage of women and black people by 0.1 percent this year".
I actually don't envy tech companies. Qualified black women get headhunted mercilessly because there just aren't that many out there. Companies are basically being asked to hire more minorities and women than there are qualified women and minorities. There's a certain degree of hiding behind Asians.
Because one of the #1 tenants of feminism is no one has to fuck anyone they don't want to, personal sexual preferences are rarely critiqued. Sometimes you have to run it through a filter. A dude who only likes skinny chicks can say "fitness is important to me". A dude who thinks submissive Asian girls are the hottest thing ever might keep that exact preference quiet while only dating petite Asian women.
So... No
I don’t think this site fits any of those scenarios.
If DEI results in hiring unqualified candidates who as a practical matter can’t be fired when their ineptitude manifests, you end up warehousing them somewhere where you think harm will be minimized and you have plausible deniability. How school districts staff inner city schools, for example. Madness, and a failing strategy.
Equalizing opportunities is one thing, but quotas and statistics alone are not the solution (just a possible warning sign). Here, the ability to freely post, and readers’ ability to ignore/mute, are all that’s needed.
What I'm curious to know is, is this based on actual first hand experience or just what he reads in the media?
It’s everyone’s first hand experience. Just look at the VP, Biden’s cabinet, and any recent Democratic nominated Supreme Court justice and tell this isn’t DEI in action. Can you honestly say the most qualified person was nominated?
I mentioned before I like perusing college catalogs to keep up on curriculums. All students at Cal Tech, for example, need to take course work in DEI.
Keep in mind the next time you drive over a bridge designed by a civil engineer who couldn’t take a class in harmonic excitation because a DEI course was required instead
In all honesty when has the most qualified candidates for any post was nominated, prior to our new era of inclusion and equality, there was always nepotism, favoritism, racism, and so many other isms that the most qualified candidates were usually overlooked and passed over, by folks with agendas, it’s a whole new set of the same same ole, same oles, with the difference being the folks that get to make the choice of candidates got themselves elected or in power using whatever the flavor of the times dictated.
Yep. You’re spot on that comment. Both sides are more than guilty of that.
The first order of business would be to shadow-ban all discussion forums that cater to straight white men. The promoted rooms would be safe spaces for non-cisgendered and POC members. No straight white people allowed, verification mandatory. Cis, white folk would be tolerated in a couple of heavily moderated rooms. The political discourse room would be reserved for seminar discussions on promoting leftist ideology only.
VIP member ship would be free for all non-cis and POC, and binary white members would be forced to pay for it or be banned. Your credit card or direct debit would be on file.
Clubs would be required to submit employment rosters demonstrating that they employ trans, non-cis, and POC in a ratio equivalent to the popularion of the metro area they do business in. That population percentage of trans, non-cis, POC is estimated at 99% throughout the US. Otherwise, they will not be white-listed.
If not a white-listed club, you would have to know the exact name and location of the strip club you are seeking to view to see its listing.
You will need to provide a signed disclosure form (.pdf format only) from any dancer you take VIP that she is non-white, consents to reviewing her performance, and your tip was no less than 35% of the dancer and house fees combined. This form must be submitted in triplicate.
To remain a member in good standing, all reviewa must include at least 25% dances from POC dancers, and 26% from non-cis dancers. These are unique dances, and may not be combined.
This DEI topic seems like any other Fox News overblown programming effort to create a distorted version of the country for low information voters.