Enough is enough

You can unfriend me, unfollow me, and unlike me; but you cannot unlick my butthole

2/7/2022 7:01:51 PM

I don't support cancel culture, I don't support silencing those who views are different than mine, I do not even believe in silencing people who say things which are universally offensive. But there are some posters whose ignorance and trolling goes beyond the pale. Those who harass, intimidate, and abuse the female TUSCL'ers are obviously within that camp (unless the lady engages in our notoriously boisterous discussion forums, then it's a free-for-all). We also have our idiot SJWs, and our troll SJWs. A very good, complete, and coherent review of Hong Kong TJ was posted by halfandhalf which received one rejection vote:

ceoaticeysangelsllc: Too Explicit
Describing acts of illicit fornication

I have this idiot on ignore, and have since forever, but I cannot not see his stupidity when reading SC reviews. First, there was nothing at all graphic in the reviews, even of HK TJ. Many approved US reviews have been far more explicit. Regardless even of how much detail the review delved into, it was fucking Tijuana! An open-air, internationally acclaimed, brothel! Dumbfuck knows this. Seriously, if you are going to abuse your VIP status, you shouldn't have it. Founder can take it away. If he won't block these accounts, he should at least disable them from being verified or VIP'ed.

5 comments

Latest

Call.Me.Ishmael

•

3 years ago

On the following link gammanu95 said: "Define irony: people who reply to a troll thread, to call the OP a troll, and bemoan their trolling."

https://tuscl.net/discussion.php?id=7852…

I have an even better definition: A guy who throws shade at people for complaining about a troll, but then starts his own thread to complain about another troll. I think that's some double irony shit going on there. Anyway, Icee also did the same thing on a Club Desire review that comes nowhere close to his complaint:

https://tuscl.net/review.php?id=382733

Here's another scoop of irony (as that's the word of the day, apparently). The dancer in that review is incredibly tame compared to most dancers at Desire. But the reality is that Icee is doing those down votes for the exact same reason that "brummie1" is posting flat-out white supremacy in the Front Room.... to stir shit and get reactions.

Like this entire thread.

I don't know founder's mind, of course. But I suspect that his response here would be that the system worked for both of those reviews. They both got published regardless of the trash votes by Icee (and desertscrub in the Desire review). I'm not sure that I agree with that argument, but I'm pretty sure that (after the post you put in the "Genocide of White Farmers" thread), you're the last guy who should get your knickers in knot over the behavior of a troll.

Tetradon

•

3 years ago

Icey thinks he's some moral compass for all of us because he doesn't P4P. Yet the same guy brags about shoplifting, pimping, pandering, and transacting illegal drugs. I've shown his stuff to actual street friends and they said no fucking way this guy is real. Still, he hasn't attacked me lately, so I'll leave him be.

He's rarely a VIP member. He posts a review maybe once a year. He'll fade.

I've noticed that Founder rarely bans people for offenses, he bans them when enough people complain about them and ratchet up the pressure. Trucidos, TXTittyFag. and others got banned because of social pressure. I have no doubt that any of us could get banned if enough people complain about us. Only exception is SJG, who treats this board as his personal entitlement. I'm convinced he's Founder's cousin.

With respect to actual trolls like Randy "Cacaplop" Peel, who admit they troll SC boards for fun, I think Founder got tired of banning him after he can come back under a new e-mail address and username. He said there's a way to permanently ban trolls like this on a new site, but I haven't seen it yet.

nicespice

•

3 years ago

I’ve written reviews in the past and a few individuals have downvoted them specifically because it was written by a dancer. But the majority of tusclers upvoted them, and I’ve never had a review outright rejected yet.

I know founder has deleted accounts over review collision before. As long as Scrubby or Icey aren’t going that far, then their silliness won’t inhibit much.

gobstopper007

•

3 years ago

Unless the dancer is just venting or trashing a place out of spite it seems I will generally vote to publish because I think their insights add a lot. I put Icey on ignore a long time ago. I do agree that one’s who constantly attack dancers who post should be at least suspended for a month.

gammanu95

•

3 years ago

Hmm, I think I hurt CIM's feelings somehow.

You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now

Got something to say?

Start your own discussion