I think Zoomers are trying to erase gender. At least it feels like that in the media.
The only ding dong I want to see is my own. Strangely Subraman wants to see it too, and nicespice wants to see Rick Dugans, but that’s another topic. San Jose Gay and CJ Kent want to see everyone’s.
This is nothing new for Playboy. I gave up my longtime subscription a couple of years ago. They've hit such hard times that you can't even get a physical copy any longer. Only digital.
I haven’t found Playboy pertinent in a long time. The publication had moved into woke and other gender erasing photos - and that’s fine - it’s just not for me.
Maybe I will become one of those guys who honestly says - I only read the articles!
Playboy is desperate for relevance and revenue. The internet, and availability of porn therein, has gutted their core audience. Swinging far left with trannies and cross-dressers show a complete lack of mission and focus. I bought a one-year subscription for myself when I had my first apartment, but it seems like their heyday was in the mid-to-late 90s.
i enjoyed reading playboy a lot during the period from 1985-95. mail subscription so never a need to check it out at the newstand. just wait for it to arrive.
the routine was always rip up the wrapper, check out the celebrity 20 questions, the jokes in the back of the centerfold section, and the last page to see what would be on the next issue. lastly check out the centerfold section to see if the girl of the month was jackoff worthy.
then once i checked out other mags like leg show, tail ends and swank i stopped subscribing to playboy.
now with all that is on the internet there is no need to even buy a physical copy anymore.
question: someone here said that there was over 3000 positive comments about the cover. is it possible that if there were a lot of negative comments there is a way to remove them?
I think playboy always wanted to be mainstream. That's why it was always so tame. But then you had playboy mansion parties where the girls were all hookers. I knew girls so proud to be invited there when they were just being paid to fuck rich men.
Most of all though, I think it is based on the premise that women are stupid. It is in the cartoons.
They have this little party girl drawing which is repeated many times in an issue. That is harmless. It is the larger cartoons with captions. They present women is total idiots.
And it makes men look stupid that we would read such stuff.
The heyday of magazines like Playboy was like air dancing for stripping. Less risky for sex workers. No physical contact with PLs, less emotionally draining, less risk of intrusive bad memories.
I had a subscription from 15-25 and haven't seen One in almost 40 years. I see it's popular among the mentally ill virtue signalers. Gender neutral. Cool we can dress the same; call each other comrade and be 1950s commies.
I find it fascinating (and sickening) that such a tiny fraction (probably 1/10 of 1%) of the population gets such outsized recognition and influence over everyone else. In my whole life I never met a single person who wants to look at trannies, or who gives one fuck about their lifestyle, affliction, or whatever you want to call it.
But now we've got trannies in Playboy, Victoria's Secret, Sports Illustrated... everywhere you look. TV commercials, women's sports, the MILITARY for fuck's sake. And everyone is expected to bend over backwards for these creepy bastards, forced to treat them as if there is something normal about it.
I've always maintained that people should be free to do whatever they want, until the point that it intrudes upon other people's freedom. Having to "pretend" that this massive redefinition of what society considers good, and decent, and normal, and attractive, is a major intrusion.
It's one thing to respect someone else's choices, for example teaching your kids not to poke fun at weirdos. It's entirely something else when you can't escape the constant bombardment of something that almost everyone finds repulsive. To me it's like someone with ass cancer walking around with a colostomy bag hanging on the outside of his clothes, and a sign that says "This is a bag of my shit," and then expecting to be welcomed at a public swimming pool.
Comments
last commentI think Zoomers are trying to erase gender. At least it feels like that in the media.
The only ding dong I want to see is my own. Strangely Subraman wants to see it too, and nicespice wants to see Rick Dugans, but that’s another topic. San Jose Gay and CJ Kent want to see everyone’s.
Log in to vote
This is nothing new for Playboy. I gave up my longtime subscription a couple of years ago. They've hit such hard times that you can't even get a physical copy any longer. Only digital.
Log in to vote
If you visit their IG there are over 3000 comments on their post of this cover and they are about 99% positive 🤷🏼♀️
Log in to vote
The gender fluid crap is bs. Girls are trying to be hypersexual and hyper feminine.
I'm all for gay rights though
Log in to vote
I haven’t found Playboy pertinent in a long time. The publication had moved into woke and other gender erasing photos - and that’s fine - it’s just not for me.
Maybe I will become one of those guys who honestly says - I only read the articles!
Log in to vote
The online content on Playboy TV and Playboy Plus is actually pretty good.
The wokest "magazine" is pathetic, kind of like the inclusive Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue nowadays.
Log in to vote
Playboy is desperate for relevance and revenue. The internet, and availability of porn therein, has gutted their core audience. Swinging far left with trannies and cross-dressers show a complete lack of mission and focus. I bought a one-year subscription for myself when I had my first apartment, but it seems like their heyday was in the mid-to-late 90s.
Log in to vote
i enjoyed reading playboy a lot during the period from 1985-95. mail subscription so never a need to check it out at the newstand. just wait for it to arrive.
the routine was always rip up the wrapper, check out the celebrity 20 questions, the jokes in the back of the centerfold section, and the last page to see what would be on the next issue. lastly check out the centerfold section to see if the girl of the month was jackoff worthy.
Log in to vote
then once i checked out other mags like leg show, tail ends and swank i stopped subscribing to playboy.
now with all that is on the internet there is no need to even buy a physical copy anymore.
question: someone here said that there was over 3000 positive comments about the cover. is it possible that if there were a lot of negative comments there is a way to remove them?
Log in to vote
Another adult website has a 'What would you do to bring back Playboy' topic.
The majority of responses are it's past its sell by date.
Log in to vote
Shadowcat wanted an issue with Ron Jeremy... 🤣🤣🤣
Log in to vote
Playboy hasn’t been relevant for decades.
Log in to vote
Getting triggered by a magazine that no longer is a magazine is pathetic.
Log in to vote
^^^ This.
Log in to vote
I think playboy always wanted to be mainstream. That's why it was always so tame. But then you had playboy mansion parties where the girls were all hookers. I knew girls so proud to be invited there when they were just being paid to fuck rich men.
Log in to vote
lol. How times have changed.
Log in to vote
Getting triggered by thinking someone else is etting triggered by a magazine that no longer is a magazine is pathetic.
Log in to vote
playboy is disgusting anyways. if you know, you know.
Log in to vote
Playboy appeals to a very conservative audience.
SJG
More about declining sexual capability and ED
/discussion.php
Texas Abortion Ban
/discussion.php
TJ Street
/photo.php
www.foxylingerie.com
www.foxylingerie.com
www.wickedtemptations.com
Log in to vote
A neighbor is moving out and he offered me a box of Playboy issues. Otherwise he was going to put then in the trash.
So I took them. Gone through a few. Running from about 25 years to 15 years old.
It is a dumb magazine.
Photo spreads way to tepid.
I remember old Penthouse and Hustler much better. And I liked best this one they had, Black Tail, seeming to be real dancers from Black Strip Clubs.
oldmags.com
In Playboy the article and ads are stupid.
Most of all though, I think it is based on the premise that women are stupid. It is in the cartoons.
They have this little party girl drawing which is repeated many times in an issue. That is harmless. It is the larger cartoons with captions. They present women is total idiots.
And it makes men look stupid that we would read such stuff.
Soon this entire box will be in the trash.
SJG
Frampton
www.youtube.com
Log in to vote
The heyday of magazines like Playboy was like air dancing for stripping. Less risky for sex workers. No physical contact with PLs, less emotionally draining, less risk of intrusive bad memories.
Log in to vote
Awwww no Ron Jeremy in dat issue? Poor shadows
Log in to vote
it’s a different time i guess.
Log in to vote
Some one gave me an old copy of Swank's Mature Nymphos. About 2000, about the same age as the Playboys I mentioned.
About like this age:
/photo.php
The mature nymphos are much more appealing than Playboy.
They are older sure, but they also just come across as more real, and as more slutty.
They are more like the dancers in our local strip clubs.
Playboy is too subdued in how the women are presented.
If you want it, Mature Nymphos makes for much better one handed reading material.
SJG
Log in to vote
I never read the articles, and the pictures they're posting now, don't interest me.
Log in to vote
You could usually count on one or two of the jokes to give you a good laugh
Log in to vote
I had a subscription from 15-25 and haven't seen One in almost 40 years. I see it's popular among the mentally ill virtue signalers. Gender neutral. Cool we can dress the same; call each other comrade and be 1950s commies.
Log in to vote
Shadowcatz is excited about da male in da Lol playboyz now. I bet he renewed his prescription
Log in to vote
I find it fascinating (and sickening) that such a tiny fraction (probably 1/10 of 1%) of the population gets such outsized recognition and influence over everyone else. In my whole life I never met a single person who wants to look at trannies, or who gives one fuck about their lifestyle, affliction, or whatever you want to call it.
But now we've got trannies in Playboy, Victoria's Secret, Sports Illustrated... everywhere you look. TV commercials, women's sports, the MILITARY for fuck's sake. And everyone is expected to bend over backwards for these creepy bastards, forced to treat them as if there is something normal about it.
I've always maintained that people should be free to do whatever they want, until the point that it intrudes upon other people's freedom. Having to "pretend" that this massive redefinition of what society considers good, and decent, and normal, and attractive, is a major intrusion.
It's one thing to respect someone else's choices, for example teaching your kids not to poke fun at weirdos. It's entirely something else when you can't escape the constant bombardment of something that almost everyone finds repulsive. To me it's like someone with ass cancer walking around with a colostomy bag hanging on the outside of his clothes, and a sign that says "This is a bag of my shit," and then expecting to be welcomed at a public swimming pool.
Log in to vote
Playboy is full of misogynic cartoons and jokes.
SJG
Log in to vote
^ Says the guy who fantasizes for almost a decade about starting a creepy rape cult.
Log in to vote
^ I had thought that Ishmael was a cadaver. But no, he still remains the longest surviving brainectomy patient.
SJG
Log in to vote
If the progressive left is going to push equality of transgenderism, at least be honest about.
NBC has been accused of airbrushing photos of the NCAA swimmer to make him look “more feminine”
Log in to vote
Playboy was a reaction to the Puritanism of the 1950s
“Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket.”
Eric Hoffer,
Log in to vote
God damnit! Still no Ron Jeremy
Log in to vote
"I had a subscription from 15-25 and haven't seen One in almost 40 years. I see it's popular among the mentally ill virtue signalers."
^No wonder skibum hates us young people so much. He calls himself mentally ill when he was 15 to 25. Classic case of projection. Sad... so sad...
Log in to vote