Seems as clubs are reopening PLs w/o VIP are writing anything to get the free VIP and catch up on the clubs - today I rejected a review which was a copy/paste of the review-guidelines - I assume this dickwad tried writing a few words and it got auto-rejected b/c it wasn't long-enough so he just went ahead and copied the review-guidelines so his "review" would be long-enough to not be auto-rejected.
As of this posting, looks like "JSmithtis" had plagiarized review removed, and maybe 2 other offending reviews, but still shows membership with remaining reviews still posted, and a gold check mark (verified member), but no VIP star for this joker.
Did founder reply to your report , T-don ?
"JSmithtis"... remember that name, and draw a bullseye on his sorry ass should he have the temerity to post anything else.
I've been declining 3 to 4 articles a week that are just one line, useless drivel. Sometimes is a one sentence review w/o naming the club or the location. Sometimes it's random statement about strippers. I just reject and check the appropriate boxes.
I rather highly doubt those dozens of names on sw she copies her reviews verbatim from are all her posts. And it is probably a man knowing how the internet works. Especially back when you had to post reviews to read for free.....
13 comments
Latest
Kidding - glad you catches that.
Did founder reply to your report , T-don ?
"JSmithtis"... remember that name, and draw a bullseye on his sorry ass should he have the temerity to post anything else.
I rather highly doubt those dozens of names on sw she copies her reviews verbatim from are all her posts. And it is probably a man knowing how the internet works. Especially back when you had to post reviews to read for free.....