So the PRO ACT passed...
nicespice
And Biden is *definitely* all for it
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room…
Reason magazine does a pretty good job of summing up the same criticisms and concerns I have. Not having as many options to move about clubs at-will is in my biased opinion, definitely a bummer. And takes away a lot of incentive to even dance in the first place...
https://reason.com/2021/03/11/california…
——
So the way I see it, it’s not completely established yet until the senate makes a decision. But Biden may just push it through anyways so at this point the PRO Act will most likely pass. But strip clubs, being strip clubs, will probably be one or the first to have to follow these rules.. And it probably won’t be reversed once that happens.
What do you guys think will most likely happen? Californians themselves reversed a lot of AB5. So with that as a precedent, how much of a grip this can have? Currently I’m imagining that if implemented at the federal level, different states will enforce this differently. But as time goes on, weak enforcement could very well become stronger enforcement and this could effect things everywhere. I’m mostly looking at this bill from the perspective of strip clubs, but I’m interesting in hearing about different points of views of other industries that could also be affected.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
11 comments
Latest
The feds want big. The unions want big.
Nothing. This has zero chance of advancing in the Senate. The House is spinning its wheels passing political wish list crap instead of advancing legislation that might actually have bipartisan support.
That is a good point about wanting to go after the big corporations vs small independents...I guess I was just assuming it would be another weapon local city halls would use as an excuse to get it going after strip clubs.
This might also be a swing at them.
That is correct and when a bunch of other industries were reversing course and getting exemptions from AB5 in California, California clubs stayed the same and it’s just going to stay with an employer model. Supposedly, a few clubs in LA quietly just ignored the laws and never switched, but neither the clubs nor the dancers from those clubs are advertising where they are. And who can blame them when stuff like the pro act is getting pushed not too long after.
Yes on the national level, the real fight is basically between Biden and Co political power vs the power of, for example, Uber and Amazon. And the reason that I consider strip clubs and dancer status relevant, even if you would rather not, is because this thread is on a strip club discussion board and not a politics discussion board (even if it’s been tough to distinguish the two at times for the past couple of years.)
—>“Actually question for somewhat older PLs, was it like this for most jobs in let's say 70s or so? Did people really have better purchasing power and stability back then? Or is it just nostalgia people are pumping”
Ooh goodness. If answered, may lead to a whole can of worms discussion of topics other than just unions. Might as well just write the eulogy for this thread right now.
https://www.cato.org/blog/why-congress-m…
It’s a bit reassuring that this does depend on the senate more than anything.