All Cops Are Bastards
georgmicrodong
Just a fat, creepy old pervert.
Shithead cops shooting tear gas and rubber bullets into groups of people peacefully protesting, an hour before the fucking curfew. Smashing and destroying water and first aid supplies. Covering badge numbers. Blatantly defying orders to activate body cams. Deliberately attacking people rendering first aid to other injured people. A host of other shit that had I done it while in the military, I would have been charged with war crimes.
If a cop calls himself good but stays silent or defends bad cops, he's not a good cop.
All fucking cops are fucking bastards.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
53 comments
Latest
NAAAASTY
Horseshit. I'm sure there are protestors doing that sort of thing, but the ones I was with weren't. Unless you want to claim that a cop's "personal space" extends to the entire block he occupies? Or down to the street from the top of a building?
I don't give a flying fuck how many obscenities are yelled in their face, it doesn't rate being gassed or beaten. The animals I observed deserve every bit of scorn heaped on them.
@NAAAASTY, yes, with my own eyes, physically present to observe and experience in person. Walking peacefully one minute, running from the CS the next. And yes, it was in fact CS gas, not the OC stuff those fucking park police in DC used. And rubber bullets being fired *directly* at us, rather than at the ground to bounce, as they're intended to be used.
I have to admit though, I *have* heard about a couple of good cops who intervened in abuse. They were fired, so unfortunately, are now unable to intervene anymore.
Fuck them all. Repeatedly.
Yep just like this racist bastard:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/03/us/david-…
I've seen images where the cops changed strategies to try and avoid face to face confrontations - i.e. the cops will set up a boundary from which protesters are not to cross and the cops will have their boundary a block away where they'll stay behind their boundary (with the empty block acting as a buffer) - things will stay that way for a while till inevitably a group of protesters will decide they will not stay in their area and will cross the boundary that was established as a safety zone for both sides - the cops must then react else might as well not have them on the streets and let all the rioters do their thing till/if they get tired.
In the cases where cops indiscriminately attack protesters that are following the law and following orders, yeah that's wrong - but it's a war-zone in many areas and in war-zones there is often unfortunately gonna be collateral damage - cops will often have to use a heavy-hand else we get the out-of-control riots - there isn't an elegant-solution when certain groups of protesters can and will start violence at any point - again I rather have the cops control the streets than the looters, and w/o the cops there the looters *will* be there doing their destruction.
Studies have shown that a little CS builds character and resilience
Bear in mind this was all the *first* of the protests in Louisville, before the fucking asshole cops escalated the violence level.
First part right, second part dead wrong. You really think we have any control over who gets elected in this country anymore? It's the corporations and the parties who control it, not the voters.
I’ve had to work with too many of those LMPD assholes. I’m not going anywhere near those protests.
Yeah - whether it's politics or anything else (news, sports, etc), the bigger the $$$ involved the often times bigger problems arise
The "peaceful protestors" are just as guilty of the violence as the actual rioters. They provide moral support to the rioters as well as critical numerical mass on the street which are necessary for the rioters to operate. They contribute to the chaos by adding to the numbers involved even if not directly rioting themselves.
These "protests" have been violent from the start. Even when a particular gathering remains technically peaceful, it can still serve to be intimidating to the community. For example, protestors are deliberately targeting middle class suburban residential areas, particularly normally quiet conservative leaning areas. The organizers have stated this is a deliberate strategy. What exactly is this supposed to accomplish other than attempt to create a climate of fear among residents? After all the violence we've seen associated with these protests that seems like a legitimate feeling for residents.
Many of the "peaceful protestors" also block roads and streets which is a form of indirect violence and a disruption to people's lives.
Not to mention they are violating Covid 19 stay at home orders with impunity.
Rubber bullets and tear gas seem more than warranted.
We as country have to make a decision how much we want to handcuff law enforcement. Obviously they need to be held accountable but too much restriction and then the crooks start to run the show. You see that in places like California and New York. In NYC the looters loot, are arrested and can’t be held due to do bail reform. So immediately are released and do it again. The city cannot stop it. Makes no sense but it does in liberal land for some god forsaken reason.
@gmd - what would be your solution? An exhaustive search and thorough vetting to identify, discipline, and remove cops unfit for service; while simultaneously better training and equipping those that do prove themselves worthy of their profession (by equipping, I mean with body cameras, protective vests, and continuing education)? Or, do you want to defund them and allow BLM to patrol the streets of black neighborhoods? Would, then, my neighbors and I be allowed to arm ourselves and patrol our neighborhood? More than a few of these homes are on 5+acre equestrian lots. I bet the evening news would love to show a bunch of white guys on horseback with rifles and shotguns, while ignoring the inevitable increase in violent crime and corruption in the BLM-patrolled hoods.
No one argues that there are very, very few LEO (municipal/county/state/federal) which would not benefit from improved training and accountability. However, there are many peer-reviewed and authenticated studies which show every police drawback during and after an investigation (Baltimore, Chicago, NYC, etc) correlates to an increase in crimes and murders, particularly in the inner cities and hoods. As always, the solution is somewhere in the middle; a moderated, common-sense approach which identifies, addresses, and corrects the problems and trouble-makers, while rewarding and promoting the hard-working and successful professionals who are exemplary in their positions. There is very little that can be done to improve the talent pool that LEO has to draw from, so the solution will be to improve the law enforcement that we have.
IMHO this drift became more pronounced when many cities adopted "broken window" policies. Sure using a heavier hand can reduce crime stats, but at what broader cost? These policies almost always fall most heavily on the backs of low income residents and have emboldened police to treat these people with disdain.
Once on the job, they reveal themselves through their actions. After a while, other cops know who the bad cops are. They’ve been disciplined for relatively minor incidents that reveal their character.
There are good police departments that catch these problem cops early in their career and terminate them. Then, there are bad departments that turn a blind eye to these bad cops until something horrible happens.
Minneapolis appears to be an example of a bad department. The cop who killed George Floyd reportedly had over a dozen disciplinary incidents, but he was still on the streets.
My guess is that most bad departments operate in cities with a corrupt city government and an ineffective mayor. They’ve allowed the rot to build in the police department over many years. If you want to get rid of bad cops, you start by cleaning out the leadership at the top.
So by your logic... George Microdong and all other peaceful protesters are now rioters and looters, treat those fuckers appropriately
I do think the cops who don’t come forward when they have knowledge of cops breaching the trust that is handed to them are just as guilty as those that commit bad actions and should be held accountable for enabling the bad actors to exist.
I do not discount what you witnessed george, and I understand your opinion.
I do respectfully disagree with your adverb "all".
You know how you foment racism ? You establish different rules for different identity groups. You label half as victims and half as suppressors. You play one group against another to gain political advantage. You tell some groups that their bad actions are understandable and should not be criticized.
Burn down a building ? Of course you did. You are a victim. It’s understandable. Poor thing. Others forced you to do this. It’s not your fault. Please enjoy this money from the government because you are a victim and can’t be expected to work.
Want to know why racism exists in Democrat controlled cities, and police departments This is why. Their solution to racism is actually causing racism.
https://www.citizenfreepress.com/breakin…
My first hand experience trumps what you might or might not have heard on the news, or what you think has or has not happened.
Unprovoked attacks against peaceful protesters not breaking the law, not even curfew (which wasn't in place then anyway).
Deliberately and specifically targeting first responders rendering first aid to the other people the thugs had attacked. And by "first responders" I mean actual EMTs, along with several nurses from nearby hospitals.
Deliberately destroying water and first aid supplies brought in by a couple of different organizations, including a local mission.
And at least one of the bastards who killed Breonna Taylor in her home because they can't read a map is on paid fucking leave.
So, I hope cop cum tastes good. Maybe they'll leave you alone.
Antifa and BLM supply bricks and rocks to “protesters” who position themselves in groups of non-violent protestors. That way, when police try to stop rocks being thrown at them, they can be accused of assaulting innocent people.
Over 600 police have been injured, some critically, by various types of projectiles.
When people were legally told to disperse they need to do so. If they don't, what happens is their fault and problem!
Let's put this in very simple terms so your micro brain MIGHT grasp it, but doubt it will. Your response will let us all know if it did.
Take yourself. OK the city park closes at 8pm. so they are locking up. Well you pea brain says lets get in the face of this old park guy. Well, he has no real authority to force you out, so he calls someone that does. You decide to defy the police, they have LEGAL on their side, you do not! Maybe when they kick your ignorant ass, you might just earn how to coexist with the normal people on this planet. If you did, you'd be a much happier and decent human for it!
I await your lame ass excuses for being a cretin!
Now I'm doubting my own sanity because I wasted my time trying to explain reason and logic to this fool! My BAD!