Advertisement

Judge orders imprisonment of Brookhaven sex toy shop owner

May 27, 2020, 2:57 PM
Avatar for doctorevil
doctorevil
vip member
Evil Lair

comments (13)

Jump to latest
Avatar for JAprufrock
JAprufrock

Good. Those dens of iniquity do nothing but promote pre-marital sex and masturbation.

Avatar for misterorange
misterorange

^^ And we all know you'll go blind from those things. Lol.

Avatar for AlBundy1966
AlBundy1966

You'll shoot your eye out LOL

Avatar for shadowcat
shadowcat

Is Pink Pony next?

Avatar for Muddy
Muddy

These stupid fucking laws

Avatar for Jascoi
Jascoi

The fucking damn prudes.

Avatar for Nidan111
Nidan111

“Legal extortion”. I fucking Hate Organized Crime (AKA GOVERNMENT). Pricks.

Avatar for goldmongerATL
goldmongerATL

So the city employs a man whose job is to count dildos??

The city says this will allow further economic development. That area is mostly old, cheap apartments and run down strip malls. Why not run THEM out of town?

Avatar for Icee Loco (asshole)

He should should just let the city rule against him then appeal it. The way the judge is phrasing it its either extortion or getting rid of perceived competition for the strip club which pays fees.

He'd win the appeal.

Avatar for Cashman1234
Cashman1234

It’s the usual government crap. His store isn’t allowed in the area, but paying more money will make it ok.

The strip club nearby is fine - as they appear to pay.

Gotta love the Moscow government officials! Oh wait - it’s Atlanta?

Avatar for san_jose_guy
san_jose_guy

"illegal to operate a “sexually oriented business” near a similar business or a residential district."

This is the new generation of laws, created in the 80's, after courts had overturned the older laws in the 60's and 70's. These new laws are probably just as unconstitutional as the older ones.

One way around for a strip club is a membership club.

SJG

Avatar for Icee Loco (asshole)

The laws are constitutional. The nature of the business is impacted by secondary legislation ie lewdness ordinances etc

Avatar for san_jose_guy
san_jose_guy

No, courts already dumped an older generation of such prohibitions because they are free speech violations. These newer laws are made to look like they are different, but they are not.

SJG

Advertisement