So the city employs a man whose job is to count dildos??
The city says this will allow further economic development. That area is mostly old, cheap apartments and run down strip malls. Why not run THEM out of town?
He should should just let the city rule against him then appeal it. The way the judge is phrasing it its either extortion or getting rid of perceived competition for the strip club which pays fees.
"illegal to operate a “sexually oriented business” near a similar business or a residential district."
This is the new generation of laws, created in the 80's, after courts had overturned the older laws in the 60's and 70's. These new laws are probably just as unconstitutional as the older ones.
One way around for a strip club is a membership club.
No, courts already dumped an older generation of such prohibitions because they are free speech violations. These newer laws are made to look like they are different, but they are not.
Comments
last commentGood. Those dens of iniquity do nothing but promote pre-marital sex and masturbation.
Log in to vote
^^
And we all know you'll go blind from those things. Lol.
Log in to vote
You'll shoot your eye out LOL
Log in to vote
Is Pink Pony next?
Log in to vote
These stupid fucking laws
Log in to vote
The fucking damn prudes.
Log in to vote
“Legal extortion”. I fucking Hate Organized Crime (AKA GOVERNMENT). Pricks.
Log in to vote
So the city employs a man whose job is to count dildos??
The city says this will allow further economic development. That area is mostly old, cheap apartments and run down strip malls. Why not run THEM out of town?
Log in to vote
He should should just let the city rule against him then appeal it. The way the judge is phrasing it its either extortion or getting rid of perceived competition for the strip club which pays fees.
He'd win the appeal.
Log in to vote
It’s the usual government crap. His store isn’t allowed in the area, but paying more money will make it ok.
The strip club nearby is fine - as they appear to pay.
Gotta love the Moscow government officials! Oh wait - it’s Atlanta?
Log in to vote
"illegal to operate a “sexually oriented business” near a similar business or a residential district."
This is the new generation of laws, created in the 80's, after courts had overturned the older laws in the 60's and 70's. These new laws are probably just as unconstitutional as the older ones.
One way around for a strip club is a membership club.
SJG
Log in to vote
The laws are constitutional. The nature of the business is impacted by secondary legislation ie lewdness ordinances etc
Log in to vote
No, courts already dumped an older generation of such prohibitions because they are free speech violations. These newer laws are made to look like they are different, but they are not.
SJG
Log in to vote