This is what I just can't get past: Regardless of "how" this whole thing started (bats, wet markets, poor laboratory procedures, whatever) in the very beginning there had to be SOME NUMBER of sick people BEFORE the WHO got involved, right? How many? I don't know - how many people have to get sick before the WHO takes notice? A thousand? A hundred? For argument's sake, let's say it's as little as a few dozen, okay? So even at the very first moment the WHO got involved, how could they POSSIBLY have said, "There's no evidence of human-to-human transmission?" If 2 or 3 dozen people suddenly fall ill with symptoms nearly identical to the flu (only more severe) and that number is literally growing by the hour, doubling or tripling daily, is there any other logical assumption besides human-to-human transmission? To say otherwise they HAD to be either STUPID or LYING, and I really don't think all those disease experts at the WHO are stupid. Corrupt and unethical - yes. Stupid - no.
Comments
last commenttrump doesnt like THE WHO
Log in to vote
youtube.com
Log in to vote
you got my point...... worlds greatest band and song
Log in to vote
THE WHO leaders are all from communist countries,,,,,,,, and have a history of bad calls......... so they need to step down
Log in to vote
we cant afford another china virus.... ( bird flu, swine flu, sars, corona)
Log in to vote
is it true that these WHO shitbags are financially supported by the computer virus extraordinaire wm. henry gates 3?
Log in to vote
Guys the WHO warned the world in December and Trump was on notice of this in December.
Log in to vote
who.int
timeline above. The world was on notice well before it came to the US. Warnings of it being contagious via droplets in January
Log in to vote
As I understand it, china also shut down travel out of wuhan to the rest of china, but let them continue to leave wuhan into the rest of the world!
Log in to vote
I'll trust the WHO before I trust our brain dead excuse for a President, My Governor (Michigan) as well.
Log in to vote
The WHO screwed the pooch when they needed to be forthcoming and objective. Unfortunately they were neither. The fundamental issue are the authoritarian former communist states that can influence unbiased science. The western world "won the cold war" but China and Russia still have the same old Soviet mentality. Did we win or did we settle for a tactical victory without regime change for the strategic betterment of the world?
Log in to vote
And yet the USA is BY FAR the largest contributor to the WHO. Almost as much as the 2nd, 3rd and 4th combined.
Log in to vote
a modern free western world can not co-exist with a stalin/chairman mao 1950 communist mindset govt to destory the western democratic countries......... china still has giant pictures of Chairman Mao Tse Tung in the red square
Log in to vote
The entire UN, and all its little agencies, have proven to be fucking useless. The US should not be wasting one cent on supporting any of it, and should start charging corporate taxes on the UN HQ in NYC until they move out.
Log in to vote
Fuck the WHO. Anything related to the UN, and amnything involving the Chinese rats. needs to be something we step away from and never fund.
Log in to vote
In the wise words of Townsend, straight from Daultrey's mouth, "We won't get fooled again"
Log in to vote
^ that was my thought, but we most likely will be fooled again jes sayin!
Log in to vote
we got fooled for 30 years........... exported all our jobs and technology to china
Log in to vote
We'll get fooled again as soon as another democrat party candidate is elected to the white house. A vote for blue, is a vote for WHO.
Log in to vote
"We Can't Trust The WHO"
Or the WHAT. Or the WHERE. The WHEN is a little shady, and especially the WHY. But I don't worry about that, because I can just find my truth on the Internet if I search enough. It's great because the Net works that way for everybody.
Log in to vote
Anyone who allows themselves to be fooled a second time is the fool.
If you're sick, stay home. If you don't want to get sick, stay home.
Log in to vote
wall,
You say, "... because I can just find my truth on the Internet if I search enough."
Therein lies the problem. Your statement, in my opinion, is 100% correct. BUT, few, very few, do their due diligence to find the truth. I am sort of discounting your "my truth" since find what one wishes to fine is usually quite simple. Finding THE truth is the difficult part.
Once one finds reliable online sources, the truth is quite a bit easier to find.
Log in to vote