This is what I just can't get past: Regardless of "how" this whole thing started (bats, wet markets, poor laboratory procedures, whatever) in the very beginning there had to be SOME NUMBER of sick people BEFORE the WHO got involved, right? How many? I don't know - how many people have to get sick before the WHO takes notice? A thousand? A hundred? For argument's sake, let's say it's as little as a few dozen, okay? So even at the very first moment the WHO got involved, how could they POSSIBLY have said, "There's no evidence of human-to-human transmission?" If 2 or 3 dozen people suddenly fall ill with symptoms nearly identical to the flu (only more severe) and that number is literally growing by the hour, doubling or tripling daily, is there any other logical assumption besides human-to-human transmission? To say otherwise they HAD to be either STUPID or LYING, and I really don't think all those disease experts at the WHO are stupid. Corrupt and unethical - yes. Stupid - no.
The WHO screwed the pooch when they needed to be forthcoming and objective. Unfortunately they were neither. The fundamental issue are the authoritarian former communist states that can influence unbiased science. The western world "won the cold war" but China and Russia still have the same old Soviet mentality. Did we win or did we settle for a tactical victory without regime change for the strategic betterment of the world?
a modern free western world can not co-exist with a stalin/chairman mao 1950 communist mindset govt to destory the western democratic countries......... china still has giant pictures of Chairman Mao Tse Tung in the red square
The entire UN, and all its little agencies, have proven to be fucking useless. The US should not be wasting one cent on supporting any of it, and should start charging corporate taxes on the UN HQ in NYC until they move out.
Or the WHAT. Or the WHERE. The WHEN is a little shady, and especially the WHY. But I don't worry about that, because I can just find my truth on the Internet if I search enough. It's great because the Net works that way for everybody.
wall,
You say, "... because I can just find my truth on the Internet if I search enough."
Therein lies the problem. Your statement, in my opinion, is 100% correct. BUT, few, very few, do their due diligence to find the truth. I am sort of discounting your "my truth" since find what one wishes to fine is usually quite simple. Finding THE truth is the difficult part.
Once one finds reliable online sources, the truth is quite a bit easier to find.
22 comments
Latest
timeline above. The world was on notice well before it came to the US. Warnings of it being contagious via droplets in January
Or the WHAT. Or the WHERE. The WHEN is a little shady, and especially the WHY. But I don't worry about that, because I can just find my truth on the Internet if I search enough. It's great because the Net works that way for everybody.
If you're sick, stay home. If you don't want to get sick, stay home.
You say, "... because I can just find my truth on the Internet if I search enough."
Therein lies the problem. Your statement, in my opinion, is 100% correct. BUT, few, very few, do their due diligence to find the truth. I am sort of discounting your "my truth" since find what one wishes to fine is usually quite simple. Finding THE truth is the difficult part.
Once one finds reliable online sources, the truth is quite a bit easier to find.