Loading...

More cornavirus news,,,

Avatar for theDirkDiggler
theDirkDigglerIllinois

www.yahoo.com

This time an antibody study in California. Supposedly the figures that are being confirmed right now only reflect 1/50 or 1/80 of all the infections already out there or recovered. Yup, everybody in New York City basically has it or had it...

Comments

last comment
Avatar for Lone_Wolf
Lone_Wolf

Link is about Scottie ,Pippen

Avatar for Subraman
Subraman

L_W: your browser sucks at the internet. It works fine for me

Avatar for Subraman
Subraman

Other news: final results on a small remdesivir study are still to be published and peer-reviewed, but word coming out of the study is they expect to show significant clinical impact. Good news if it holds.

Avatar for Warrior15
Warrior15

Gosh I hope this is true. If so, then we are weeks away from this being over. Also, it looks like Gilead's drug actually works very well. Big study will be released in two weeks.

Avatar for Subraman
Subraman

So, three bits of news: lots of people have been exposed to coronavirus, remdesivir is promising, and Lone Wolf's browser forgot how to internet

Avatar for Lone_Wolf
Lone_Wolf

Interesting study. I expected the % to be much higher

Avatar for RandomMember
RandomMember

"... found that 2.5 to 4.2% of those tested were positive for antibodies "


We need 50% -> 70% range to get to herd immunity. So it's not all good news.

Avatar for JamesSD
JamesSD

It actually could be a good thing if a lot of people were exposed and asymptomatic. One step closer to herd immunity

Avatar for Papi_Chulo
Papi_Chulo

Lone-Wolf's browser needs some remdesivir

Avatar for Subraman
Subraman

I hear he gave his browser chloroquine and now it's on a ventilator

Avatar for RandomMember
RandomMember

"One step closer to herd immunity"


One tiny step. I don't see how that's good news.

Avatar for Subraman
Subraman

New coronavirus news: Lone_Wolf's browser seen wearing a confederate flag and protesting the lockdown

Avatar for RandomMember
RandomMember

@Dirk: "Yup, everybody in New York City basically has it or had it..."


I don't get it. If 2.5% to 4.2% have it in Santa Clara County, why should we assume everyone has it in NYC? Am I missing something?

Want to add a comment?