The Spectator Review
Papi_Chulo
Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
1) singular subject type reviews - e.g. where the guy just talks about his RIL interest in the review and does not provide any more info about the club except how awesome Bambi is - etc
2) the spectator review - e.g. "nice club - nice looking girls - had a good time - just chilled and didn't get any dances" - pretty-much all there is to the review - kinda a generic description w/ no solid details about the club - sure; some/many of these are probably made-up reviews just to get VIP where the reviewer probably didn't step foot in the club - but some of them seem genuine in that the reviewer felt it was a solid review to say he just hung out and it was A-ok to write a review about him just hanging out and omitting important details such as dance-cost and dance-mileage - there are times one can write an informative review w/o getting dances; e.g. "club was horrible w/ super-ugly girls thus I didn't buy any dances" - but there are reviews where the reviewer writes he liked the club but didn't get any dances and doesn't provide any info on prices or mileage - to me this is analogous to reviewing a restaurant where you didn't eat the food
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
20 comments
Latest
Can't recall a recent one - but have def read a good # over time
So I like to describe the dances I had, and by mentioning that I'm a non-extras guy, the level of mileage commonly/easily available.
Throw in some pricing info, a little description about the club, and bingo, you're done. I, too, don't understand why so many reviews are, shall we say, low value.
I am probably guilty of the first review on occasion. But sometimes, only one dancer truly captures your fancy such that she's the only one you talk to, get dances from, etc. I can see how some then proceed to base a review of an entire club on one dancer.
I think the key is to make mention of that at least. "There was only one woman there I found worth my time; the rest were 6's or worse." That alone can be telling.
Generally speaking, though, remember the four key letters with all reviews:
YMMV.
WCG
Money need not be involved if you treat her in a civilian manner
WCG
Now private VIPs are a different matter and that is where your reviews frustrate me in the same way that non-LD reviews do to you. In Miami of all places, where ITC fun is amply available, you seem content to pay to sniff the meal rather than buy it outright and dig in. Indeed, I can't even read your reviews anymore because I walk away too annoyed after investing several minutes wading through minutiae but then never getting the payoff, which is the pricing, privacy and services of the private rooms of the club.
I'm not trying to be a jerk here, but rather just point out that different reviewers go to the clubs with different priorities.
Not useful to me.
One could not get dances but still be able to give a solid description of the club - when one reads your reviews one gets a good idea of what the club is about- problem is too many reviewers are either too lazy to type up proper info or they don't get (care?) that reviews should be to inform others vs it being a personal-journal entry
Honestly, there's several users who will approve anything regardless of content length.