The Spectator Review

Agree. Not a fan. I assume there are strippers. I also assume that Bambi and Porsche and Trixy are hot. It is a strip club with some sort of skin that is likely to be on display. I prefer to know if the club atmosphere, safety, booze caliber and mileage is going to be worth my time. I have money. It is time that eludes me in my quests.

Chulo give us an example of the review you described in the first paragraph lol

@GoV

Can't recall a recent one - but have def read a good # over time

Yes if it’s gonna be this type of review then you gotta atleast give me pricing. Can’t not have both

For me, a guy that doesn't go real often, writing a review is a chance to "review" in my mind the fun I had. So I like to describe the dances I had, and by mentioning that I'm a non-extras guy, the level of mileage commonly/easily available. Throw in some pricing info, a little description about the club, and bingo, you're done. I, too, don't understand why so many reviews are, shall we say, low value.

Those reviews are written to get the reviewer 2 weeks free membership not to help others. No money for dances no money for membership.

The key is to try and strike a balance.

I am probably guilty of the first review on occasion. But sometimes, only one dancer truly captures your fancy such that she's the only one you talk to, get dances from, etc. I can see how some then proceed to base a review of an entire club on one dancer.

I think the key is to make mention of that at least. "There was only one woman there I found worth my time; the rest were 6's or worse." That alone can be telling.

Generally speaking, though, remember the four key letters with all reviews:

YMMV.

/\ i thought reviews needed five key letters FRMOS

WCG

It's ok to make a review mostly about one dancer as long as one still describes the club (prices, available mileage, description of the overall dancer-crew) - then talk about your love for Bambi

Papi-if you love Bambi go for the FRMOS, then when you're ready take her to the back room for oral both ways and FS

Money need not be involved if you treat her in a civilian manner

WCG

I guess I'm as guilty as anyone of the "spectator review" as I simply find LDs to be pointless. I much prefer to be entertained barside and will gladly tip when it is warranted. So my reviews normally include a lot of details, but rarely anything about LD mileage. I couldn't give a fuck which girl will let me stick a finger in her pussy and which won't because nether accomplishes anything for me.

Now private VIPs are a different matter and that is where your reviews frustrate me in the same way that non-LD reviews do to you. In Miami of all places, where ITC fun is amply available, you seem content to pay to sniff the meal rather than buy it outright and dig in. Indeed, I can't even read your reviews anymore because I walk away too annoyed after investing several minutes wading through minutiae but then never getting the payoff, which is the pricing, privacy and services of the private rooms of the club.

I'm not trying to be a jerk here, but rather just point out that different reviewers go to the clubs with different priorities.

I'm also annoyed by the Penthouse Forum style reviews that only lack the "I never thought it could happen to me..." opening, and then provide a long brag.

Not useful to me.

Just saw a review with the wrong prices. The guy just made up random numbers to make his fake review look more legit. The sad thing is five people approved the wrong info.

^^^ I'd report it. But that's me.

I am not sure if the TR-style review hits one of Papi's sore points or not. I highly value a review that gives me insights into particular girls. I value club layout and dance prices and drink prices, but I only need to read that in one review -- I'd bet everyone reads at least 10 reviews before going to a place, no need to see that re-iterated 10 times. By contrast, a review that gives me insight into specific girls -- no details that might get her in trouble, but a recent review that lets me know Bambi the brunette spinner and Zoe the alt girl are amazing, and that Brandy the tall blonde is a ROB, is incredibly useful info to know. More useful than reading drink prices 9 more times.

@RD

One could not get dances but still be able to give a solid description of the club - when one reads your reviews one gets a good idea of what the club is about- problem is too many reviewers are either too lazy to type up proper info or they don't get (care?) that reviews should be to inform others vs it being a personal-journal entry

Proper club info should be made easy to know/learn w/o having to read 10-reviews (especially when one wants to research multiple clubs) - talk about Bambi but put in a couple sentences for those that are interested in learning about the club and may not necessarily give a fuck about Bambi - that way one helps out more people/readers

Fair enough Papi. I clearly misinterpreted the thrust of your comments regarding spectator reviews. I agree that too many of these reviews are a combo of autobiographical details and generic crap with little to no specific intel about the club and the dancers. I down-vote them when I have the time to read unpublished reviews, but there seems to be a handful of usernames that will approve just about anything so long as its long enough.

Papi, I don't disagree that a review shouldn't basically be an advertisement for Bambi. On reading reviews -- I am saying everyone reads a bunch of reviews before going somewhere anyway, there's no such thing as someone reading a single review and making all their plans based on that, so no reason every review has to cover everything. Whether you "have to" read 5 reviews or not, most PLs will read more than that anyway, just to cover their bases. There's no reason to cater to "I'll only read a single review and then I'll decide" PLs, because they don't exist.

RickDugan said "but there seems to be a handful of usernames that will approve just about anything so long as its long enough."

Honestly, there's several users who will approve anything regardless of content length.