OT: Backlash Erupts in Canadian Province After Government Kills Basic Income Tes

Papi_Chulo
Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
Ontario, Canada has scrapped its experiment with basic income—a hot but largely untested idea for reducing poverty—before any results could be gleaned, sparking criticism from researchers and outrage from program recipients.

The project, introduced in 2017 and expected to last for three years, provided a basic income to 4,000 low-income people. But with the election of conservative Doug Ford[ as Ontario’s premier in June, the program was cancelled earlier this week.

“I feel I have been stabbed in the back by my own government,” one income recipient told Business Insider. “I honestly have no idea what’s happening next because there has been no communication whatsoever.

Program participants who earned less than $34,000 Canadian annually ($26,000 in U.S. currency) received up to $17,000 Canadian annually. Couples making under $48,000 Canadian received up to $24,000 Canadian, minus 50% of earned income.

The program was ended because ministry officials felt it didn’t help residents become “independent contributors to the economy,” according to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. One researcher involved with the program, however, said there wasn’t enough data to make this statement.

“There’s no conceivable way that they were told the project wasn’t working,” the researcher told CBC, asking to remain anonymous. “We just don’t have any data to know whether it was working or not.”

The program’s cancellation also breaks Ford’s campaign promise to keep it going. Social Services Minister Lisa MacLeod told reporters on Wednesday that the administration hopes to create “a better plan” within 100 days.

“[There’s] the decision in the campaign and then you find the realities of when you’re in government,” said MacLeod, according to the CBC. “My commitment to the people of Ontario, particularly the people who are most vulnerable, is that we will get it right.”

However, program participants are mostly angry and disheartened. One program recipient, who has lived in poverty for 15 years, told Business Insider that the basic income pilot was “a huge ray of hope,” and that the future is now uncertain.

An advocate for basic income, Scott Santens, shared his anger on Twitter after the announcement about the program’s cancellation. “I am so angry right now, I am shaking,” he wrote. “Can you imagine a politician pulling the plug on a vaccine that was dramatically reducing cancer so much that it’s already arguably unethical to not immediately expand it to everyone? This is wrong.”

Universal basic income is an idea that has been floated for decades. It’s been tested in countries like Finland and Kenya, and may reach U.S. urban centers like Chicago and Silicon Valley.

http://fortune.com/2018/08/03/universal-…

4 comments

Latest

san_jose_guy
6 years ago
This "Basic Income" was not Universal Basic Income. That goes to everyone,no needs test.

More people will be able to have paying employment and to run profitable businesses with this system because the economy is expanded by taking some of the money which gets used to inflate the stock and real estate markets and redistributing it.

The idea of UBI is not to make residents into "independent contributors to the economy". The whole idea is to stop making the nation's politics revolve around scapegoating the poor.

You can tell if a UBI program is working if people are able to be housed and live with security at a modest level. It is not intended to "morally reform" anyone, except perhaps maybe for the rich.

SJG
Icey
6 years ago
If governments won't force the private sector to pay living wages, we can either experiment with alternate methods....or let the system fail completely and replace it with anything else...But as is, the current system is unsustainable
san_jose_guy
6 years ago
UBI, not needs tested, means that finally our politics will no longer revolve around scapegoating of the poor.

And UBI will end the false trade off between having more jobs for more people, versus living wages, climate protections, worker safety and rights protections, product safety protections, and tax breaks.

SJG
san_jose_guy
6 years ago
Need to go to UBI, and without further delay.

SJG
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion