Is stripping sex work ?

avatar for Papi_Chulo
Papi_Chulo
Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
If a dancer does not do-extras/have-sex with custies and just does 2-way contact dances with no FIV, is that sex work although "perhaps" by definition she's not having sex.

27 comments

Jump to latest
avatar for flagooner
flagooner
6 years ago
Are you turning into a troll Papi?
avatar for nicespice
nicespice
6 years ago
Yes.
avatar for PaulDrake
PaulDrake
6 years ago
Grey area
avatar for Dblednmike
Dblednmike
6 years ago
Yes. If the guy is getting aroused or she is trying to arouse him.
avatar for theDirkDiggler
theDirkDiggler
6 years ago
Is posing nude for soft core porn shoots or videos with or without masturbation sex work? I think it is. So is phone sex, although i don't see ads for that anymore. "Adult" work sounds so much more boring anyway, stupid even...
avatar for aham5
aham5
6 years ago
I say no. They're entertainers.
avatar for RandomMember
RandomMember
6 years ago
Rose is a rose...
avatar for blahblahblah23
blahblahblah23
6 years ago
I consider stripping sex work along with camming, phone sex, escorting, sugar babies. But to me sex work=sex industry. Doesn't have to involve sex acts.
avatar for Dominic77
Dominic77
6 years ago
Yes
avatar for twentyfive
twentyfive
6 years ago
They’re sex working entertainers, and some I assume are good people;)
avatar for nicespice
nicespice
6 years ago
At the end of the day, a stripper (even an Orlando air dancer) makes money because the customer wants to fuck. Or at least the illusion of doing so if the customer wouldn’t actually do that for whatever reason.

Further reading:
http://titsandsass.com/man-calls-cops-on…
avatar for jackslash
jackslash
6 years ago
I don’t consider it work.
avatar for Bbybunny
Bbybunny
6 years ago
It’s an umbrella term we face the same stigma escorts and other sex workers face.
avatar for blahblahblah23
blahblahblah23
6 years ago
At the end of the day, a stripper (even an Orlando air dancer) makes money because the customer wants to fuck. Or at least the illusion of doing so if the customer wouldn’t actually do that for whatever reason.

^ that's exactly why I consider stripping the sex industry lol
avatar for shadowcat
shadowcat
6 years ago
Wikipedia - "A sex worker is a person who is employed in the sex industry.[1][2] The term is used in reference to all those in all areas of the sex industry including those who provide direct sexual services as well as the staff and management of such industries."

So Yes.
avatar for flagooner
flagooner
6 years ago
Wikipedia. The ultimate resource.
avatar for flagooner
flagooner
6 years ago
Technically it is not.

While there may be sex in the VIP rooms it is not a part of the job description, hence the term "extras".
avatar for san_jose_guy
san_jose_guy
6 years ago
Going by the logic of those who invented the concept of "Sex Work", yes it is, even zero touching stage only stripping.

I have a female friend who calls Viet Coffee and Breastaurants "Beauty Work". So that is where she draws the line, that is not actually Sex Work.

I think sex workers want their term to be inclusive. They want to prevent Good Girls vs Bad Girls type dichotomies. They don't want women saying, while I am a stripper, but she is a prostitute.

SJG

Bruce Chilton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN3brxti…

TJ Steet
https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5488/9620…

https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7290/9620…

https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5497/96200…

https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7361/96322…

https://c1.staticflickr.com/6/5539/96203…

https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5449/96322…

https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5520/96203…

http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/nkeeS3HHJrU/hqdef…
avatar for strippercutie404
strippercutie404
6 years ago
I don't know why so many people trash wikipedia! My teachers don't allow it to be used as a source but whenever I'm writing papers, I always end up using Wikipedia but use the sources that they used and my teachers can never tell the difference.
avatar for Dblednmike
Dblednmike
6 years ago
The main issue with Wikipedia is that anyone can make changes, so that compromises the information. As long as you’re not citing Wikipedia as your source and are actually following up on the information it’s a good starting point.
avatar for flagooner
flagooner
6 years ago
Citing wikipedia is about as legitimate as citing SJG.
avatar for Huntsman
Huntsman
6 years ago
Yes
avatar for twentyfive
twentyfive
6 years ago
Don’t patronize me Papi !
avatar for DeclineToState
DeclineToState
6 years ago
---> "The main issue with Wikipedia is that anyone can make changes, so that compromises the information."

So true. One time I was reading the Led Zeppelin Wikipedia page and someone had altered to it state Abraham Lincoln was Led Zep's lead guitarist. The edit disappeared a day later but it demonstrates the compromised info issue.
avatar for flagooner
flagooner
6 years ago
A couple years ago Daniel Tosh invited his fans to make up shit on his page. It was hysterical.
avatar for NinaBambina
NinaBambina
6 years ago
I think the answer is an obvious yes.
avatar for san_jose_guy
san_jose_guy
6 years ago
Sex work is supposed to unite all such persons, women and men, involved in any related type of work.

SJG
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now